https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
Michael Catanzaro mcatanzaro@gnome.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
--- Comment #71 from Michael Catanzaro mcatanzaro@gnome.org --- (In reply to Kevin Fenzi from comment #70)
I'm perfectly aware of that, but that is not required for a Fedora review.
I guess the question is if Tom would like to keep a legal hold on this until we hear back from the FSF or if we should move forward.
Tom dropped the original FE-Legal hold way back in comment #2.
It was re-added in comment #54, but I see no actual legal questions there: only technical objections.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235 [Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org