https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823226
Bug ID: 823226 QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: notting@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: sqlheavy - GObject wrapper for SQLite Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: aalves@gmail.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora
Spec URL: http://alvesadrian.fedorapeople.org/sqlheavy.spec SRPM URL: http://alvesadrian.fedorapeople.org/sqlheavy-0.1.1-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: SQLHeavy is a wrapper on top of SQLite with a GObject-based interface Fedora Account System Username: alvesadrian
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823226
Michael Scherer misc@zarb.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |misc@zarb.org
--- Comment #1 from Michael Scherer misc@zarb.org --- Hi,
a few comment on the spec : - you should have a -devel subpackage for developpement related files ( .h, .pc, etc ) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Devel_Packages
- I am not sure, but I think there was some discussion regarding the place of vala files. However, that's not in the policy yet, so I would just suggest to keep a eye on it
- the package do not compile on rawwhide ( it does on f17 however ). Not sure why, but you can check with mock.
- the license tag is invalid https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Valid_License_S...
- there is no ldconfig call in %post, and that's kinda required https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Shared_libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823226
--- Comment #2 from Adrian Alves aalves@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #1)
Hi,
a few comment on the spec :
- you should have a -devel subpackage for developpement related files ( .h,
.pc, etc ) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Devel_Packages
- I am not sure, but I think there was some discussion regarding the place
of vala files. However, that's not in the policy yet, so I would just suggest to keep a eye on it
- the package do not compile on rawwhide ( it does on f17 however ). Not
sure why, but you can check with mock.
- the license tag is invalid
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging: LicensingGuidelines#Valid_License_Short_Names
- there is no ldconfig call in %post, and that's kinda required
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Shared_libraries
I added sub-package devel but not sure if that is correct: Spec URL: http://alvesadrian.fedorapeople.org/sqlheavy.spec SRPM URL: http://alvesadrian.fedorapeople.org/sqlheavy-0.1.1-2.fc16.src.rpm
By the way fixed the license tag and added the ldconfig in post and postun
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823226
Thomas Moschny thomas.moschny@gmx.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomas.moschny@gmx.de
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Moschny thomas.moschny@gmx.de --- Your %files section needs a bit of rework. See http://thm.fedorapeople.org/sqlheavy/sqlheavy.spec .
Also, rpmlint warns about mixed tabs and spaces, maybe you want to recheck that and either use tabs or spaces for indention.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823226
--- Comment #4 from Adrian Alves aalves@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #3)
Your %files section needs a bit of rework. See http://thm.fedorapeople.org/sqlheavy/sqlheavy.spec .
Also, rpmlint warns about mixed tabs and spaces, maybe you want to recheck that and either use tabs or spaces for indention.
Added ur modifications: Spec URL: http://alvesadrian.fedorapeople.org/sqlheavy.spec SRPM URL: http://alvesadrian.fedorapeople.org/sqlheavy-0.1.1-3.fc16.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823226
Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aalves@gmail.com Flags| |needinfo?(aalves@gmail.com)
--- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu --- I am triaging old review tickets. I can't promise a review if you reply, but by closing out the stale tickets we can devote extra attention to the ones which aren't stale.
This fails to build for me. A scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5403710
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823226
Elliott Sales de Andrade quantum.analyst@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |quantum.analyst@gmail.com Blocks| |201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed| |2017-10-04 23:39:59
--- Comment #6 from Elliott Sales de Andrade quantum.analyst@gmail.com --- It doesn't seem like anyone replied.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org