Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192546
Summary: Review Request: gnubiff Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink@leemhuis.info ReportedBy: splinux@fedoraproject.org QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com
Spec URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gnubiff/gnubiff.spec SRPM URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gnubiff/gnubiff-2.2.0-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Gnubiff is a mail notification program that periodically checks for mail and displays headers when new mail has arrived
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gnubiff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192546
bdpepple@ameritech.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink@leemhuis.info |bdpepple@ameritech.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gnubiff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192546
gauret@free.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gauret@free.fr
------- Additional Comments From gauret@free.fr 2006-05-20 12:48 EST ------- Brian, are you reviewing this package ? Anyway here's my take at it (can't harm to have more people for review)
Needs work: * BuildRequires: gettext is missing (required by the %find_lang macro) * /usr/share/info/dir is already owned by info, don't own it (put %{_datadir}/info/*.info.gz in %files for example) * Scriptlets: missing "install-info" in %post and %preun (in the wiki: ScriptletSnippets)
Minor: * Version and Source1 are not properly lined-up (tabs instead of spaces) * Duplicate BuildRequires: gtk2-devel (by libglade2-devel) * At the end of ./configure, there is "Gnome support: no". Is that what you want ? From http://gnubiff.sourceforge.net, GNOME support could be useful. Perhaps a missing "BuildRequires: gnome-panel-devel" only ?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gnubiff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192546
------- Additional Comments From splinux@fedoraproject.org 2006-05-21 17:31 EST ------- Ok, i've made the changes. Source : http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gnubiff/
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gnubiff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192546
------- Additional Comments From bdpepple@ameritech.net 2006-05-21 18:19 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129786) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129786&action=vie...) Mock build log failure
Your package fails to build in Mock. Also, you can drop the BR on gettext-devel, since the default build environment in Mock installs gettext.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gnubiff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192546
------- Additional Comments From splinux@fedoraproject.org 2006-05-22 16:31 EST ------- Change available at http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gnubiff/
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gnubiff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192546
------- Additional Comments From gauret@free.fr 2006-05-23 07:53 EST ------- Everything looks OK, but how about enabling GNOME support ? It looks like it can be embedded in the panel this way. It'd be a nice feature to have IMHO.
By the way, version 2.2.1 is out.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gnubiff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192546
------- Additional Comments From bdpepple@ameritech.net 2006-05-23 10:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5)
Everything looks OK, but how about enabling GNOME support ? It looks like it can be embedded in the panel this way. It'd be a nice feature to have IMHO.
By the way, version 2.2.1 is out.
In addition to the GNOME support, it looks like it also has some SSL/crypto support that would be worthwile to enable.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gnubiff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192546
------- Additional Comments From splinux@fedoraproject.org 2006-05-23 13:11 EST ------- - Upgrade to 2.2.1 - Add --prefix='pkg-config libpanelapplet-2.0 openssl --variable=prefix in %con$ - Add gnome-panel-devel, openssl-devel in BuildRequires
Changes available: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gnubiff/
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gnubiff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192546
bdpepple@ameritech.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From bdpepple@ameritech.net 2006-05-23 15:26 EST ------- MD5Sums: 8d2ef679f42e7a593dc88b750d0cca4c gnubiff-2.2.1.tar.gz
Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All directories are owned by this or other packages * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * All desired features are enabled * Package builds in Mock. * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly on FC5. * rpmlint produces no error.
Bad: * Don't pass '--prefix=`pkg-config libpanelapplet-2.0 openssl --variable=prefix`' to the %configure macro. It's not needed.
Minor: * In the file section, '%{_datadir}/info' should be '%{_infodir}'. Refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/RPMMacros * Unnecessary documentation: ABOUT-NLS & Changelog. The first is a generic build tools file, and the second is duplicate information that is included in the NEWS file.
Once these items are fixed, considered this approved.
+1 Approve
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gnubiff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192546
splinux@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
------- Additional Comments From splinux@fedoraproject.org 2006-05-24 00:11 EST ------- - Remove --prefix='pkg-config libpanelapplet-2.0 openssl --variable=prefix OK - Remove ABOUT-NLS & Changelog in %file section OK - Fixing %{_datadir}/info to {_infodir} OK
Package imported in Extras
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gnubiff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=192546
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org