https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254743
Bug ID: 2254743 Summary: Review Request: rust-psl - Extract root domain and suffix from a domain name Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: albertlarsan@unbon.cafe QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: https://albertlarsan.fr/fedpkgs/rust-psl/rust-psl.spec SRPM URL: https://albertlarsan.fr/fedpkgs/rust-psl/rust-psl-2.1.13-1.fc40.src.rpm Description: Extract root domain and suffix from a domain name Fedora Account System Username: albertlarsan68
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254743
Fedora Review Service fedora-review-bot@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |https://crates.io/crates/ps | |l
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Review Service fedora-review-bot@fedoraproject.org --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6760611 (succeeded)
Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-rev...
Please take a look if any issues were found.
--- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254743
Albert Larsan albertlarsan@unbon.cafe changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edited ---
Spec URL: https://albertlarsan.fr/fedpkgs/rust-psl/rust-psl.spec SRPM URL: https://albertlarsan.fr/fedpkgs/rust-psl/rust-psl-2.1.13-1.fc40.src.rpm Description: Extract root domain and suffix from a domain name Fedora Account System Username: albertlarsan68
Dependency for rust-addr, depencency of rust-adblock.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254743
Michel Lind michel@michel-slm.name changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |michel@michel-slm.name CC| |michel@michel-slm.name Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags| |fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254743
Michel Lind michel@michel-slm.name changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ Status|ASSIGNED |POST
--- Comment #2 from Michel Lind michel@michel-slm.name --- Package was generated with rust2rpm, simplifying the review.
- package builds and installs without errors on rawhide - test suite is run and all unit tests pass - latest version of the crate is NOT packaged => 2.1.14 is now out, please update when importing - license matches upstream specification (MIT OR Apache-2.0) and is acceptable for Fedora - license file is included with %license in %files - package complies with Rust Packaging Guidelines
Package APPROVED.
===
Recommended post-import rust-sig tasks (use `fedora-sig-onboard onboard rust-$crate` to automate):
- add @rust-sig with "commit" access as package co-maintainer
- set bugzilla assignee overrides to @rust-sig (optional)
- set up package on release-monitoring.org: project: $crate homepage: https://crates.io/crates/$crate backend: crates.io version scheme: semantic version filter: alpha;beta;rc;pre distro: Fedora Package: rust-$crate
- track package in koschei for all built branches
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254743
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Review Service fedora-review-bot@fedoraproject.org --- Hello @albertlarsan68, since this is your first Fedora package, you need to get sponsored by a package sponsor before it can be accepted.
A sponsor is an experienced package maintainer who will guide you through the processes that you will follow and the tools that you will use as a future maintainer. A sponsor will also be there to answer your questions related to packaging.
You can find all active sponsors here: https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-sponsors/
I created a sponsorship request for you: https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/issue/614 Please take a look and make sure the information is correct.
Thank you, and best of luck on your packaging journey.
--- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254743
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions fedora-admin-xmlrpc@fedoraproject.org --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-psl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254743
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|POST |MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2024-76de234d43 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-76de234d43
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254743
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2024-01-18 18:00:26
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2024-76de234d43 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org