[Bug 1550317] New: Review Request: python-flask-security - Flask-Security quickly adds security features to your Flask application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550317
Bug ID: 1550317 Summary: Review Request: python-flask-security - Flask-Security quickly adds security features to your Flask application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: itamar@ispbrasil.com.br QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: https://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/review/python-flask-security.spec SRPM URL: https://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/review/python-flask-security-1.7.5-2.fc27....
Description: Flask-Security quickly adds security features to your Flask application
Fedora Account System Username: itamarjp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550317
Itamar Reis Peixoto itamar@ispbrasil.com.br changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1380826
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380826 [Bug 1380826] Review Request: pgadmin4 - Management tool for PostgreSQL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550317
Randy Barlow rbarlow@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |rbarlow@redhat.com Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |rbarlow@redhat.com Flags| |fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550317
Randy Barlow rbarlow@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar@ispbrasil.com.br Flags| |needinfo?(itamar@ispbrasil. | |com.br)
--- Comment #1 from Randy Barlow rbarlow@redhat.com --- Version 1.7.5 is quite old, and there's a newer 3.0.0 that claims to fix a security issue:
- Fixed a security bug when validating a confirmation token, also checks if the email that the token was created with matches the user's current email.
https://github.com/mattupstate/flask-security/blob/develop/CHANGES
I think we should probably package 3.0.0 instead of 1.7.5.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550317
Itamar Reis Peixoto itamar@ispbrasil.com.br changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |1550314 Flags|needinfo?(itamar@ispbrasil. | |com.br) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550314 [Bug 1550314] Review Request: python-flask-mail - A Flask extension for sending email messages.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550317
--- Comment #2 from Itamar Reis Peixoto itamar@ispbrasil.com.br --- I will post the updated spec file after we get python-flask-mail in.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550317
--- Comment #3 from Itamar Reis Peixoto itamar@ispbrasil.com.br --- Spec URL: https://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/review/python-flask-security.spec
SRPM URL: https://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/review/python-flask-security-3.0.0-1.fc27....
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550317 Bug 1550317 depends on bug 1550314, which changed state.
Bug 1550314 Summary: Review Request: python-flask-mail - A Flask extension for sending email messages. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550314
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550317
Randy Barlow rbarlow@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(itamar@ispbrasil. | |com.br)
--- Comment #4 from Randy Barlow rbarlow@redhat.com --- A few issues to fix:
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. Note: No known owner of /usr/lib/python3.6/site- packages/flask_security/templates/security/email, /usr/lib/python3.6 /site-packages/flask_security/templates, /usr/lib/python3.6/site- packages/flask_security/translations, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/flask_security/templates, /usr/lib/python3.6/site- packages/flask_security/__pycache__, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/flask_security/translations, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/flask_security/templates/security/email, /usr/lib/python2.7 /site-packages/flask_security, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/flask_security/templates/security, /usr/lib/python3.6/site- packages/flask_security/templates/security, /usr/lib/python3.6/site- packages/flask_security [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python3.6/site- packages/flask_security/templates/security/email, /usr/lib/python3.6 /site-packages/flask_security/templates, /usr/lib/python3.6/site- packages/flask_security/__pycache__, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/flask_security/templates, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/flask_security/translations, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/flask_security/templates/security/email, /usr/lib/python2.7 /site-packages/flask_security, /usr/lib/python3.6/site- packages/flask_security/translations, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/flask_security/templates/security, /usr/lib/python3.6/site- packages/flask_security/templates/security, /usr/lib/python3.6/site- packages/flask_security
Recommendation: Simply put %{python2_sitelib}/flask_security and %{python3_sitelib}/flask_security into your %files sections, rather than trying to write out all the subpaths.
[!]: You have %{?python_provide:%python_provide python%{python3_pkgversion}-%{pkg_name}} in the Python 2 subpackage.
Recommendation: It should be %{?python_provide:%python_provide python2-%{pkg_name}}.
Optional, but recommended: Upstream does have a test suite. I recommend running it in a %check section.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550317
Itamar Reis Peixoto itamar@ispbrasil.com.br changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(itamar@ispbrasil. | |com.br) |
--- Comment #5 from Itamar Reis Peixoto itamar@ispbrasil.com.br --- I fixed some items, others still pending,
if you unpack Flask-Security-3.0.0.tar.gz and read setup.py you will see that for running tests requires alot of items that's not available in fedora repos.
tests_require = [ ....
also for building docs 'Flask-Sphinx-Themes>=1.0.1' is required.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550317
Itamar Reis Peixoto itamar@ispbrasil.com.br changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |1553867
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553867 [Bug 1553867] Review Request: python-flask-sphinx-themes - Sphinx themes for Flask and related projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550317
--- Comment #6 from Itamar Reis Peixoto itamar@ispbrasil.com.br --- Spec URL: https://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/review/python-flask-security.spec
SRPM URL: https://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/review/python-flask-security-3.0.0-1.fc27....
building html docs and man page.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550317
Randy Barlow rbarlow@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(itamar@ispbrasil. | |com.br)
--- Comment #7 from Randy Barlow rbarlow@redhat.com --- There are still problems with ownership:
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. Note: No known owner of /usr/lib/python3.6/site- packages/flask_security/templates/security/email, /usr/lib/python3.6 /site-packages/flask_security/templates, /usr/lib/python3.6/site- packages/flask_security/translations, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/flask_security/templates, /usr/lib/python3.6/site- packages/flask_security/__pycache__, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/flask_security/translations, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/flask_security/templates/security/email, /usr/lib/python2.7 /site-packages/flask_security/templates/security, /usr/lib/python3.6 /site-packages/flask_security/templates/security [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python3.6/site- packages/flask_security/templates/security/email, /usr/lib/python3.6 /site-packages/flask_security/templates, /usr/lib/python3.6/site- packages/flask_security/__pycache__, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/flask_security/templates, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/flask_security/translations, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/flask_security/templates/security/email, /usr/lib/python3.6 /site-packages/flask_security/translations, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/flask_security/templates/security, /usr/lib/python3.6/site- packages/flask_security/templates/security
You can set your files sections to be like I described in Comment #4 to fix this.
Why are you using %{python3_pkgversion} in your Requires and BuildRequires? You can just use the number 3, which is simpler. I suggest using this form:
Requires: python3-flask BuildRequires: python3-flask-sphinx-themes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550317
Itamar Reis Peixoto itamar@ispbrasil.com.br changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |1562650 Flags|needinfo?(itamar@ispbrasil. | |com.br) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562650 [Bug 1562650] Review Request: python-flask-babelex - Adds i18n/l10n support to Flask applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550317 Bug 1550317 depends on bug 1553867, which changed state.
Bug 1553867 Summary: Review Request: python-flask-sphinx-themes - Sphinx themes for Flask and related projects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553867
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550317 Bug 1550317 depends on bug 1562650, which changed state.
Bug 1562650 Summary: Review Request: python-flask-babelex - Adds i18n/l10n support to Flask applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562650
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550317
--- Comment #8 from Itamar Reis Peixoto itamar@ispbrasil.com.br ---
Why are you using %{python3_pkgversion} in your Requires and BuildRequires? You can just use the number 3, which is simpler. I suggest using this form:
I am interested in maybe building it for epel.
Spec URL: https://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/review/python-flask-security.spec SRPM URL: https://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/review/python-flask-security-3.0.0-1.fc28....
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550317
Randy Barlow rbarlow@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Randy Barlow rbarlow@redhat.com --- Approved!
Before building, please change the URL from http:// to https://.
Suggestions:
* Use the %{?_smp_mflags} macro on your make commands. * Remove the execute bit from the man page.
Package Review ==============
Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====
Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 128 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/rbarlow/reviews/1550317-python-flask-security/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic: [!]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python2 -flask-security , python3-flask-security , python-flask-security-doc [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint ------- Checking: python2-flask-security-3.0.0-1.fc29.noarch.rpm python3-flask-security-3.0.0-1.fc29.noarch.rpm python-flask-security-doc-3.0.0-1.fc29.noarch.rpm python-flask-security-3.0.0-1.fc29.src.rpm python2-flask-security.noarch: W: no-documentation python2-flask-security.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flask_security/translations/da_DK/LC_MESSAGES/flask_security.mo python2-flask-security.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flask_security/translations/de_DE/LC_MESSAGES/flask_security.mo python2-flask-security.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flask_security/translations/fr_FR/LC_MESSAGES/flask_security.mo python2-flask-security.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flask_security/translations/ru_RU/LC_MESSAGES/flask_security.mo python3-flask-security.noarch: W: no-documentation python3-flask-security.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/flask_security/translations/da_DK/LC_MESSAGES/flask_security.mo python3-flask-security.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/flask_security/translations/de_DE/LC_MESSAGES/flask_security.mo python3-flask-security.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/flask_security/translations/fr_FR/LC_MESSAGES/flask_security.mo python3-flask-security.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/flask_security/translations/ru_RU/LC_MESSAGES/flask_security.mo python-flask-security-doc.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/python-flask-security-doc/html/.buildinfo python-flask-security-doc.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/python-flask-security-doc/html/objects.inv python-flask-security-doc.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man1/flask-security.1.gz 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 13 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- python3-flask-security.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://github.com/mattupstate/flask-security/ <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> python3-flask-security.noarch: W: no-documentation python3-flask-security.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/flask_security/translations/da_DK/LC_MESSAGES/flask_security.mo python3-flask-security.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/flask_security/translations/de_DE/LC_MESSAGES/flask_security.mo python3-flask-security.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/flask_security/translations/fr_FR/LC_MESSAGES/flask_security.mo python3-flask-security.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/flask_security/translations/ru_RU/LC_MESSAGES/flask_security.mo python-flask-security-doc.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://github.com/mattupstate/flask-security/ <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> python-flask-security-doc.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/python-flask-security-doc/html/.buildinfo python-flask-security-doc.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/python-flask-security-doc/html/objects.inv python-flask-security-doc.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man1/flask-security.1.gz python2-flask-security.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://github.com/mattupstate/flask-security/ <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> python2-flask-security.noarch: W: no-documentation python2-flask-security.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flask_security/translations/da_DK/LC_MESSAGES/flask_security.mo python2-flask-security.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flask_security/translations/de_DE/LC_MESSAGES/flask_security.mo python2-flask-security.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flask_security/translations/fr_FR/LC_MESSAGES/flask_security.mo python2-flask-security.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flask_security/translations/ru_RU/LC_MESSAGES/flask_security.mo 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 16 warnings.
Requires -------- python3-flask-security (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi) python3-flask python3-flask-babel python3-flask-login python3-flask-mail python3-flask-principal python3-flask-wtf python3-itsdangerous python3-passlib
python-flask-security-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
python2-flask-security (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi) python2-flask python2-flask-babel python2-flask-login python2-flask-mail python2-flask-principal python2-flask-wtf python2-itsdangerous python2-passlib
Provides -------- python3-flask-security: python3-flask-security python3.6dist(flask-security) python3dist(flask-security)
python-flask-security-doc: python-flask-security-doc
python2-flask-security: python-flask-security python2-flask-security python2.7dist(flask-security) python2dist(flask-security)
Source checksums ---------------- https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/F/Flask-Security/Flask-Securi... : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : d61daa5f5a48f89f30f50555872bdf581b2c65804668b0313345cd7beff26432 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : d61daa5f5a48f89f30f50555872bdf581b2c65804668b0313345cd7beff26432
Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1550317 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550317
--- Comment #10 from Itamar Reis Peixoto itamar@ispbrasil.com.br --- $ fedpkg --module-name python-flask-security request-repo 1550317 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/5646
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550317
--- Comment #11 from Gwyn Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-flask-security
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550317
--- Comment #12 from Itamar Reis Peixoto itamar@ispbrasil.com.br --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/5658 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/5659
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550317
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- python-flask-security-3.0.0-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-48f664b3ed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550317
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550317
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- python-flask-security-3.0.0-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-48f664b3ed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550317
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2018-04-14 22:36:25
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- python-flask-security-3.0.0-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
bugzilla＠redhat.com