Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data
Alias: perl-Encode-Detect
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250804
cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu
Alias| |perl-Encode-Detect
------- Additional Comments From cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu 2007-08-24 11:44 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
Yeah, the Fedora Packaging Guidelines don't speak that much on
building perl
modules. What I used, I originally copied from a RHEL package. (I have
multiple other perl packages I want to contribute, which is why I'm waiting for
this one to be reviewed before I proceed.)
There is a collection of perl packaging "best practices" under
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Perl . Note that these aren't
official guidelines, but are generally what perl reviewers will use when looking
at a package.
The reason why I don't use %{module} et. al. macros in Source0:
is because I
always download the source by copying-and-pasting it into a wget command. I
actually like having the additional edit; it forces me to Do The Right Thing
whenever I grab a new version of the package.
An interesting approach :) I find "spectool -g foo.spec" helps to download new
versions of sources with slightly fewer mouse/key strokes than wget.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.