[Bug 2242795] New: Review Request: conda-index - Create repodata.json for collections of conda packages

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795

            Bug ID: 2242795
           Summary: Review Request: conda-index - Create repodata.json for
                    collections of conda packages
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Hardware: All
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
         Component: Package Review
          Severity: medium
          Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
          Reporter: orion(a)nwra.com
        QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
                CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
    Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://orion.fedorapeople.org/conda-index.spec
SRPM URL:
https://orion.fedorapeople.org/conda-index-0.3.0-1.fc40~bootstrap.src.rpm
Description:
Create repodata.json for collections of conda packages.

The conda_index command operates on a channel directory. A channel directory
contains a noarch subdirectory at a minimum and will almost always contain
other subdirectories named for conda's supported platforms linux-64, win-64,
osx-64, etc. A channel directory cannot have the same name as a supported
platform. Place packages into the same platform subdirectory each archive was
built for. Conda-index extracts metadata from these packages to generate
index.html, repodata.json etc. with summaries of the packages' metadata. Then
conda uses the metadata to solve dependencies before doing an install.

By default, the metadata is output to the same directory tree as the channel
directory, but it can be output to a separate tree with the --output <output>
parameter. The metadata cache is always placed with the packages, in .cache
folders under each platform subdirectory.

After conda-index has finished, its output can be used as a channel conda
install -c file:///path/to/output ... or it would typically be placed on a
web server.

Fedora Account System Username: orion


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795

Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...

[Bug 2242795] Review Request: conda-index - Create repodata.json for collections of conda packages

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795

Fedora Review Service <fedora-review-bot(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                URL|                            |https://github.com/conda/co
                   |                            |nda-index



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Review Service <fedora-review-bot(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6507030
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-...

Please take a look if any issues were found.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795

Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...

[Bug 2242795] Review Request: python-conda-index - Create repodata.json for collections of conda packages

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795

Orion Poplawski <orion(a)nwra.com&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Doc Type|---                         |If docs needed, set a value
            Summary|Review Request: conda-index |Review Request:
                   |- Create repodata.json for  |python-conda-index - Create
                   |collections of conda        |repodata.json for
                   |packages                    |collections of conda
                   |                            |packages



--- Comment #2 from Orion Poplawski <orion(a)nwra.com&gt; ---
Spec URL: https://orion.fedorapeople.org/python-conda-index.spec
SRPM URL:
https://orion.fedorapeople.org/python-conda-index-0.3.0-1.fc40~bootstrap....


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795

Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...

[Bug 2242795] Review Request: python-conda-index - Create repodata.json for collections of conda packages

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Review Service <fedora-review-bot(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6706853
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-...

Found issues:

- License file LICENSE is not marked as %license
  Read more:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidel...

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795

Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...

[Bug 2242795] Review Request: python-conda-index - Create repodata.json for collections of conda packages

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795

Orion Poplawski <orion(a)nwra.com&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |2252512





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252512
[Bug 2252512] Review Request: conda-build - Commands and tools for building
conda packages
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795

[Bug 2242795] Review Request: python-conda-index - Create repodata.json for collections of conda packages

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795

Jerry James <loganjerry(a)gmail.com&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |loganjerry(a)gmail.com
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org    |loganjerry(a)gmail.com
              Flags|                            |fedora-review?



--- Comment #4 from Jerry James <loganjerry(a)gmail.com&gt; ---
I will take this review.  If you are up for a Java review, I could use one for
bug 2247877.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795

Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...

[Bug 2242795] Review Request: python-conda-index - Create repodata.json for collections of conda packages

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795



--- Comment #5 from Jerry James <loganjerry(a)gmail.com&gt; ---
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated

Issues:
=======
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
  in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
  for the package is included in %license.
  Note: License file LICENSE is not marked as %license
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text

  I see that the LICENSE file is in the distinfo, but it is not marked as a
  license file:
  $ rpm -qLp python3-conda-index-0.3.0-1.fc40~bootstrap.noarch.rpm
  $

  I have been told that flit does not do the license file marking.

===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 3-Clause License", "*No
copyright*
     curl License", "*No copyright* BSD 3-Clause License", "*No
copyright*
     GNU Lesser General Public License", "*No copyright* zlib License".
121
     files have unknown license.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 3822 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
     process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
     packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
     versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
     use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[!]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python3-conda-index-0.3.0-1.fc40~bootstrap.noarch.rpm
          python-conda-index-0.3.0-1.fc40~bootstrap.src.rpm
================================================ rpmlint session starts
================================================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp4kb8cilu')]
checks: 31, packages: 2

================= 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0
badness; has taken 0.5 s =================




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts
============================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 1

python3-conda-index.noarch: E: spelling-error ('repodata', 'Summary(en_US)
repodata -> reportage')
python3-conda-index.noarch: E: spelling-error ('json', 'Summary(en_US) json
->
son, j son, soon')
python3-conda-index.noarch: E: spelling-error ('repodata', '%description -l
en_US repodata -> reportage')
python3-conda-index.noarch: E: spelling-error ('json', '%description -l en_US
json -> son, j son, soon')
python3-conda-index.noarch: E: spelling-error ('noarch', '%description -l
en_US
noarch -> no arch, no-arch, monarch')
python3-conda-index.noarch: E: spelling-error ('subdirectory', '%description
-l
en_US subdirectory -> sub directory, sub-directory, directory')
python3-conda-index.noarch: E: spelling-error ('subdirectories',
'%description
-l en_US subdirectories -> sub directories, sub-directories, directorates')
python3-conda-index.noarch: E: spelling-error ('osx', '%description -l en_US
osx -> ox, OS')
python3-conda-index.noarch: E: spelling-error ('html', '%description -l en_US
html -> HTML')

None of those are misspelled.  This is a limitation of the dictionary we use.

python3-conda-index.noarch: W: python-missing-require click
python3-conda-index.noarch: W: python-missing-require conda
python3-conda-index.noarch: W: python-missing-require conda-package-streaming
python3-conda-index.noarch: W: python-missing-require filelock
python3-conda-index.noarch: W: python-missing-require jinja2
python3-conda-index.noarch: W: python-missing-require more-itertools
python3-conda-index.noarch: W: python-missing-require ruamel.yaml

These appear to be due to an rpmlint bug, as they all appear in the Requires.

 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 9 errors, 7 warnings, 5 filtered, 9
badness; has taken 0.1 s 



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/conda/conda-index/archive/0.3.0/conda-index-0.3.0.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     :
dc44fc779bdf34809c1c6b97131d983e71bc373590a12ef6226425d294141405
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
dc44fc779bdf34809c1c6b97131d983e71bc373590a12ef6226425d294141405


Requires
--------
python3-conda-index (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    python(abi)
    python3.12dist(click)
    python3.12dist(conda)
    python3.12dist(conda-package-streaming)
    python3.12dist(filelock)
    python3.12dist(jinja2)
    python3.12dist(more-itertools)
    python3.12dist(ruamel-yaml)



Provides
--------
python3-conda-index:
    python-conda-index
    python3-conda-index
    python3.12-conda-index
    python3.12dist(conda-index)
    python3dist(conda-index)



Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2242795 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Python, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: Ocaml, Java, Haskell, fonts, R, Ruby, C/C++, Perl,
SugarActivity, PHP
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795

Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...

[Bug 2242795] Review Request: python-conda-index - Create repodata.json for collections of conda packages

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795



--- Comment #6 from Orion Poplawski <orion(a)nwra.com&gt; ---
Ah, I was curious about the license file.  It is now manually marked.

Spec URL: https://orion.fedorapeople.org/conda-index.spec
SRPM URL:
https://orion.fedorapeople.org/conda-index-0.3.0-1.fc40~bootstrap.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795

Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...

[Bug 2242795] Review Request: python-conda-index - Create repodata.json for collections of conda packages

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795



--- Comment #7 from Jerry James <loganjerry(a)gmail.com&gt; ---
That appears to be the same spec file and srpm as the ones I reviewed.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795

Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...

[Bug 2242795] Review Request: python-conda-index - Create repodata.json for collections of conda packages

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795



--- Comment #8 from Orion Poplawski <orion(a)nwra.com&gt; ---
Sorry about the - rpmbuild generates the bootstrap srpm but fedpkg local does
not.  Try now?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795

Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...

[Bug 2242795] Review Request: python-conda-index - Create repodata.json for collections of conda packages

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795



--- Comment #9 from Jerry James <loganjerry(a)gmail.com&gt; ---
Well ... no, it's still the same spec file and the same srpm.  I even used wget
in case my browser was caching the old versions, but I'm still seeing the
original reviewed versions that don't mark a license file.  Just to be clear on
what I'm looking for, you're adding a %license directive I assume?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795

Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...

[Bug 2242795] Review Request: python-conda-index - Create repodata.json for collections of conda packages

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795



--- Comment #10 from Orion Poplawski <orion(a)nwra.com&gt; ---
Ah, the issue is with the rename - we are now doing:

Spec URL: https://orion.fedorapeople.org/python-conda-index.spec
SRPM URL:
https://orion.fedorapeople.org/python-conda-index-0.3.0-1.fc40~bootstrap....


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795

Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...

[Bug 2242795] Review Request: python-conda-index - Create repodata.json for collections of conda packages

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Review Service <fedora-review-bot(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
---
Created attachment 2002799
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2002799&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6706853 to 6725466


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795

Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...

[Bug 2242795] Review Request: python-conda-index - Create repodata.json for collections of conda packages

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Review Service <fedora-review-bot(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6725466
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-...

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795

Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...

[Bug 2242795] Review Request: python-conda-index - Create repodata.json for collections of conda packages

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795

Jerry James <loganjerry(a)gmail.com&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |POST



--- Comment #13 from Jerry James <loganjerry(a)gmail.com&gt; ---
Okay, that did it.  This package is APPROVED.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795

Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...

[Bug 2242795] Review Request: python-conda-index - Create repodata.json for collections of conda packages

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
<fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; ---
The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-conda-index


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795

Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...

[Bug 2242795] Review Request: python-conda-index - Create repodata.json for collections of conda packages

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795

Orion Poplawski <orion(a)nwra.com&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |RAWHIDE
             Status|POST                        |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|                            |python-conda-index-0.3.0-1.
                   |                            |fc40
        Last Closed|                            |2023-12-05 04:13:30



--- Comment #15 from Orion Poplawski <orion(a)nwra.com&gt; ---
Thank you for the review.  Checked in and built.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242795

Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...