Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xerces-c27 - Compatibility package for Xerces C++ 2.7.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435125
tcallawa(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flag| |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From tcallawa(a)redhat.com 2008-03-07 16:06 EST -------
Review
=======
Good:
- rpmlint checks return:
xerces-c27-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
xerces-c27-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib64/xerces-c-2.7.0/libxerces-c.so ../libxerces-c.so.27
xerces-c27-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib64/xerces-c-2.7.0/libxerces-depdom.so ../libxerces-depdom.so.27
xerces-c27-devel.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
All are safe to ignore.
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (ASL 2.0) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on devel (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- doc subpackage OK
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file
- devel subpackage OK, depends on base package
Approved.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.