[Bug 1179484] New: Review Request: python-cram - Simple testing framework for command line applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
Bug ID: 1179484 Summary: Review Request: python-cram - Simple testing framework for command line applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ktdreyer@ktdreyer.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: https://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-cram.spec SRPM URL: https://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-cram-0.6-1.fc22.src.rpm Description: Cram tests look like snippets of interactive shell sessions. Cram runs each command and compares the command output in the test with the command's actual output. Fedora Account System Username: ktdreyer
Rawhide (F22) scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8543492
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
--- Comment #1 from Ken Dreyer ktdreyer@ktdreyer.com --- Here's a new version that fixes a bad copy-and-paste in the %description, as well as an rpmlint issue with shebangs.
* Tue Jan 06 2015 Ken Dreyer ktdreyer@ktdreyer.com - 0.6-2 - Fix bad copy-and-paste for %%description in python3 subpackage - Fix shebangs to satisfy rpmlint's non-executable-script errors
Exact change in Git: https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/ktdreyer/public_git/python-cram.git/commit/?id...
Spec URL: https://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-cram.spec SRPM URL: https://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-cram-0.6-2.fc22.src.rpm
Rawhide (F22) scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8544126
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
Niranjan MR niranjan@ashoo.in changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |niranjan@ashoo.in
--- Comment #2 from Niranjan MR niranjan@ashoo.in --- Greetings,
This is un-official Package review.
Package Review ==============
Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====
Generic: [ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated". 2 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/makerpm/review/cram/review-python- cram/licensecheck.txt [ ]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [ ]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/python3.4/site- packages/__pycache__(python3-setuptools, python3-six, python3-libs) [ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [ ]: Changelog in prescribed format. [ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [ ]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package [ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [ ]: Package does not generate any conflict. [ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [ ]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 81920 bytes in 18 files. [ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python: [ ]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [ ]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [ ]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic: [!]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [ ]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python3-cram [ ]: Package functions as described. [ ]: Latest version is packaged. [ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [ ]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [ ]: %check is present and all tests pass. [ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [ ]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. Note: %define requiring justification: %define srcname cram [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint ------- Checking: python-cram-0.6-2.fc22.noarch.rpm python3-cram-0.6-2.fc22.noarch.rpm python-cram-0.6-2.fc22.src.rpm python-cram.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/python-cram/empty.t python-cram.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/python-cram/COPYING.txt python-cram.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cram-2.7 python-cram.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cram python3-cram.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot C Utilities and processors for the Python Imaging Libary. python3-cram.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/python3-cram/empty.t python3-cram.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/python3-cram/COPYING.txt python3-cram.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cram-3.4 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 4 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ^[]0;<mock-chroot>^G<mock-chroot>[root@pki1 /]# rpmlint python-cram python3-cram python-cram.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/python-cram/empty.t python-cram.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/python-cram/COPYING.txt python-cram.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cram-2.7 python-cram.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cram python3-cram.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot C Utilities and processors for the Python Imaging Libary. python3-cram.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/python3-cram/empty.t python3-cram.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/python3-cram/COPYING.txt python3-cram.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cram-3.4 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 4 warnings. ^[]0;<mock-chroot>^G<mock-chroot>[root@pki1 /]# echo 'rpmlint-done:'
Requires -------- python-cram (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/python python(abi)
python3-cram (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/python3 python(abi) python3
Provides -------- python-cram: python-cram
Could you have a look at the rpmlint errors. Specifically the Non man page of some binaries and incorrect fsf address.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
--- Comment #3 from Ken Dreyer ktdreyer@ktdreyer.com --- I don't think the man page issue is going to be fixed, but I've filed a request for the GPL update here: https://bitbucket.org/brodie/cram/pull-request/7/update-gpl-text-in-copyingt...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
--- Comment #4 from Niranjan MR niranjan@ashoo.in --- Also all the binaries should have the man page. If not provided, You might require to file request upstream to provide the man page.
Also regarding the zero length file . E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/python3-cram/empty.t E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/python-cram/empty.t
zero length files should generally not be included.
Please refer:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#zero-length
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks?rd=PackageMaintainers/Packag...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
--- Comment #5 from Ken Dreyer ktdreyer@ktdreyer.com --- Hi Niranjan, I appreciate the thoroughness in your review. I've decided to simply stop shipping the .t files that are from the "/examples/" directory. The test suite depends on them, so I can't remove them until after %check is done. And there are multiple rpmlint issues with these (both the empty.t and .hidden.t files trigger rpmlint's warnings).
* Wed Jan 07 2015 Ken Dreyer ktdreyer@ktdreyer.com - 0.6-3 - Do not ship examples files in package. These are more like test files. (RHBZ #1179484)
Exact change in Git: https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/ktdreyer/public_git/python-cram.git/commit/?id...
Spec URL: https://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-cram.spec SRPM URL: https://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-cram-0.6-3.fc22.src.rpm
F22 scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8548661
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
Boris Ranto branto@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |branto@redhat.com
--- Comment #6 from Boris Ranto branto@redhat.com --- One more thing: the spec file says the licence is BSD while it should say GPLv2.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
--- Comment #7 from Ken Dreyer ktdreyer@ktdreyer.com --- (In reply to Boris Ranto from comment #6)
One more thing: the spec file says the licence is BSD while it should say GPLv2.
Great catch, sorry about that. It was another bad copy-and-paste from a previous package.
New version:
* Thu Jan 08 2015 Ken Dreyer ktdreyer@ktdreyer.com - 0.6-4 - Correct License tag (RHBZ #1179484)
Exact change in Git: https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/ktdreyer/public_git/python-cram.git/commit/?id...
Spec URL: https://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-cram.spec SRPM URL: https://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-cram-0.6-4.fc22.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
Till Maas opensource@till.name changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource@till.name
--- Comment #8 from Till Maas opensource@till.name --- (In reply to Niranjan MR from comment #2)
Greetings,
This is un-official Package review.
Package Review
Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====
Generic: [ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
@Niranjan if you use fedora-review, you still need to go through the checks that need to be done manually and if you checked them add the proper sign to the boxes.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
--- Comment #9 from Till Maas opensource@till.name --- COPYING.txt needs to be marked as %license if it contains the license text (this is a recend packaging guideline change)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
--- Comment #10 from Ken Dreyer ktdreyer@ktdreyer.com --- (In reply to Till Maas from comment #9)
COPYING.txt needs to be marked as %license if it contains the license text
Thanks Till, I've fixed this in the new version.
* Sat Apr 04 2015 Ken Dreyer ktdreyer@ktdreyer.com - 0.6-5 - Use %%license macro (RHBZ #1179484)
Exact change in Git: https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/ktdreyer/public_git/python-cram.git/commit/?id...
Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/ktdreyer/public_git/python-cram.git/plain/pyth... SRPM URL: https://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-cram-0.6-5.fc23.src.rpm
Rawhide (F23) scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9415079
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbyszek@in.waw.pl changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |zbyszek@in.waw.pl Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |zbyszek@in.waw.pl
--- Comment #11 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbyszek@in.waw.pl --- - Dist tag is not present → add %{?dist} to Release.
You should convert to the new python macros %py2_build, %py2_install, %py3_build, %py3_install, and build python2- and python3- subpackages [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Example_common_spec_file].
The guidelines say you should provide both cram-2.7 and cram-2, and cram-3.5 and cram-3 [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Executables_in_.2Fusr.2Fbin].
%{py3dir} is also deprecated. Use a subdirectory instead.
python3-cram.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot C Utilities and processors for the Python Imaging Libary.
The python 2 version of the script should use /usr/bin/python2 (i.e. %{__python2}), not /usr/bin/python in the header.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
--- Comment #12 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitoring@fedoraproject.org --- ktdreyer's scratch build of python-cram-0.6-6.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12078505
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
--- Comment #13 from Ken Dreyer ktdreyer@ktdreyer.com --- Thanks Zbigniew, I've fixed this in the new version.
* Sun Dec 06 2015 Ken Dreyer ktdreyer@ktdreyer.com - 0.6-6 - Update for latest Python packaging guidelines (thanks zbyszek@in.waw.pl) (rhbz#1179484) - rm Group tag - drop support for el6
Exact change in Git: https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/ktdreyer/public_git/python-cram.git/commit/?id...
Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/ktdreyer/public_git/python-cram.git/plain/pyth... SRPM URL: https://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-cram-0.6-6.fc24.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
--- Comment #14 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitoring@fedoraproject.org --- ktdreyer's scratch build of python-cram-0.6-7.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12078681
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
--- Comment #15 from Ken Dreyer ktdreyer@ktdreyer.com --- Zbigniew, you pointed out some other things that I missed earlier. I've fixed them in this latest version.
* Sun Dec 06 2015 Ken Dreyer ktdreyer@ktdreyer.com - 0.6-7 - Correct Summary for python3-cram subpackage (thanks zbyszek@in.waw.pl) (rhbz#1179484) - rm py3dir macro (thanks zbyszek@in.waw.pl) (rhbz#1179484)
Exact change in Git: https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/ktdreyer/public_git/python-cram.git/commit/?id...
Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/ktdreyer/public_git/python-cram.git/plain/pyth... SRPM URL: https://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-cram-0.6-7.fc24.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
--- Comment #16 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbyszek@in.waw.pl --- python-devel → python2-devel
You can drop the other Group tag (not harmful, just unnecessary).
- license is OK (GPLv2) - license file is present, %license is used - latest version - new python packaging template is used - provides/requires are OK - no scriptlets present or needed - rpmlint:
python2-cram.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/python2-cram/COPYING.txt python3-cram.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/python3-cram/COPYING.txt
Oh, there's an important thing that I missed. Is it correct to say that the functionality provided by /bin/cram-2 and /bin/cram-3 is the same, i.e. that it is independent of the python version? It seems so. In that case there's no need to package both executables, and no need to add the -3, -3.5, -2.6, -2, symlinks. There should be just one executable /usr/bin/cram, using /usr/bin/python3 [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Executables_in_.2Fusr.2Fbin].
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
--- Comment #17 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitoring@fedoraproject.org --- ktdreyer's scratch build of python-cram-0.6-8.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12096520
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
--- Comment #18 from Ken Dreyer ktdreyer@ktdreyer.com --- Thanks Zbigniew, this new version addresses your comments.
* Mon Dec 07 2015 Ken Dreyer ktdreyer@ktdreyer.com - 0.6-8 - BR: python2-devel instead of python-devel (thanks zbyszek@in.waw.pl) (rhbz#1179484) - rm Group tag from py3 subpackage (thanks zbyszek@in.waw.pl) (rhbz#1179484) - Only package a single executable, /usr/bin/cram (thanks zbyszek@in.waw.pl) (rhbz#1179484)
Exact change in Git: https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/ktdreyer/public_git/python-cram.git/commit/?id...
Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/ktdreyer/public_git/python-cram.git/plain/pyth... SRPM URL: https://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-cram-0.6-8.fc24.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbyszek@in.waw.pl changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |POST Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #19 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbyszek@in.waw.pl --- Suggestions:
- Do not repeat Summary text, just use %{summary} in the second and later ones.
- You can drop the version specificianions for python3 >= 3.1, >= 3.2.4, because the earliest python3 that is available is Fedora is 3.4.
Package is APPROVED.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
--- Comment #20 from Ken Dreyer ktdreyer@ktdreyer.com --- Thank you Zbigniew for the package review. I've incorporated your suggestions in my latest version:
* Mon Dec 07 2015 Ken Dreyer ktdreyer@ktdreyer.com - 0.6-9 - Use %%{summary} macro in py2/py3 subpackages (thanks zbyszek@in.waw.pl) (rhbz#1179484) - Drop old py3 minimum version numbers (thanks zbyszek@in.waw.pl) (rhbz#1179484)
Exact change in Git: https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/ktdreyer/public_git/python-cram.git/commit/?id...
I've requested the new package in pkgdb.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
--- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-cram
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- python-cram-0.6-9.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-a40317274b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|POST |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- python-cram-0.6-9.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-04410bc35c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- python-cram-0.6-9.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-7eb06b5735
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- python-cram-0.6-9.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'yum --enablerepo=epel-testing update python-cram' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-a40317274b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- python-cram-0.6-9.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-cram' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-04410bc35c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- python-cram-0.6-9.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-cram' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-7eb06b5735
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- python-cram-0.6-9.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2016-01-07 14:28:17
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- python-cram-0.6-9.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- python-cram-0.6-9.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Red Hat Bugzilla