9:07 a.m.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,notting(a)redhat.com
Spec URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xdvik.spec
SRPM URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xdvik-22.84.13-1.fc8.src.rpm
Description: Xdvik, the kpathsea version of xdvi, is a previewer for DVI files
produced e.g. by the TeX or troff typesetting systems.
Some background: Jindrich Novy's monumental and impressive texlive packaging effort
includes xdvik since it is part of the TeXLive 2007 release. However, TeXLive isn't
the upstream for xdvik, and Patrice Dumas posted a request on fedora-devel asking for
people to volunteer standalone packages for components of texlive which have their own
upstream. xdvik is such a package.
This package builds on F8, but still needs a fair bit of work, and is not yet review
ready. However, I wanted to get it out in the open early to get feedback.
What I have done:
* Sun Jan 6 2008 Jonathan G. Underwood <jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com> - 22.84.13-1
- Initial package based on the texlive.spec by Jindrich Novy
- Updated to latest upstream xdvik and Japanese xdvik
- Reviewed all patches relating to xdvi in texlive.spec and cherry picked
those that are still needed
- Reworked the patch to allow building of xdvik and pxdvik
What still needs to be done:
Currently this builds against the bundled kpathsea library sources in
the tarball. We should be building against the kpathsea(-devel) packages
instead. Lots of missing Requires and BuildRequires. Needs building in Mock
for devel and rpmlint checking. And testing lots.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
9:42 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |t.matsuu(a)gmail.com,
| |mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-06 10:42 EST
-------
CC-ing Matsuura-san.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
8:18 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com 2008-01-12 21:18 EST
-------
Spec URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xdvik.spec
SRPM URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xdvik-22.84.13-2.fc9.src.rpm
* Sun Jan 13 2008 Jonathan G. Underwood <jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com> -
22.84.13-2
- Add patch to build against system kpathsea rather than the one in the tarball
- Same patch also removes all includes to the t1lib headers shipped in the
tarball to
prevent conflicts with system t1lib-devel
- Spefile cleanups
Builds fine in mock, doesn't seem to give rpmlint errors or warnings. Therefore,
it's ready for review.
One thing a reviewer might check is where I've put the documentation - it's
unclear if docs should go in /usr/share/doc or /usr/share/texmf/doc. I favour
the former, since that's where docs for all other packages go.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
8:19 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com 2008-01-12 21:19 EST
-------
Oh, I should also say, I don't actually have a rawhide installation to check
this runs on, so any testing of the built packages would be much appreciated.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
2:49 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From pertusus(a)free.fr 2008-01-13 15:49 EST -------
The kpathsea directory was still necessary because of dependencies.
I have sort of fixed it by redoing the dependencies without
the kpathsea directory, then rerunning configure to use the new
depend.mk file and last removing the kpathsea directory.
I also made a patch for xdg-open, could you please submit it
upstream?
Also I made other little fixes.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
2:49 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From pertusus(a)free.fr 2008-01-13 15:49 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=291513)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291513&action=view)
remove kpathsea directory + minor fcleanups
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
2:50 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From pertusus(a)free.fr 2008-01-13 15:50 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=291514)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291514&action=view)
add xdg-open to the browsers
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
3:12 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com 2008-01-13 16:12 EST
-------
(In reply to comment #4)
Thanks for looking it over, Patrice.
The kpathsea directory was still necessary because of dependencies.
I have sort of fixed it by redoing the dependencies without
the kpathsea directory, then rerunning configure to use the new
depend.mk file and last removing the kpathsea directory.
Ah, yes, well spotted, ingenious fix. Don't you love this crufty code :)
I also made a patch for xdg-open, could you please submit it
upstream?
Yeah - I'd just fixed that by replaing htmlview with xdg-open, but it's better
to have both there, I agree. Once we've got it all sorted out I plan to send an
email with all of the issues listed - I'll hold off for now to see if we find more.
Also I made other little fixes.
ok, will check, thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
3:45 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From pertusus(a)free.fr 2008-01-13 16:45 EST -------
I've given up permitting to use system kpathsea upstream.
The dependencies are computed statically before the build
including and it is too complicated to have it changed in my
opinion.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
4:23 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com 2008-01-13 17:23 EST
-------
Spec URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xdvik.spec
SRPM URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xdvik-22.84.13-3.fc9.src.rpm
* Sun Jan 13 2008 Jonathan G. Underwood <jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com> -
22.84.13-3
- Added xdg-open patch (Patrice Dumas)
- Avoid dependency generation implicating the bundled kpathsea files (Patrice Dumas)
- Added Requires for Xaw3d
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
4:24 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com 2008-01-13 17:24 EST
-------
(In reply to comment #8)
I've given up permitting to use system kpathsea upstream.
The dependencies are computed statically before the build
including and it is too complicated to have it changed in my
opinion.
Yes, I can quite understand that - I gave up too. I will however describe the
issues we had to deal with to upstream in the hope that will provoke them to
revisit their autotoolery.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
3:33 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From pertusus(a)free.fr 2008-01-14 04:33 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=291577)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291577&action=view)
spec file patch fix japanese and minor cleanups
Use bcond for japanese, and fix it.
fix license.
Use update-desktop-database scriptlets everywhere from the
guidelines.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
3:35 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From pertusus(a)free.fr 2008-01-14 04:35 EST -------
(In reply to comment #11)
Use bcond for japanese, and fix it.
fix license.
Use update-desktop-database scriptlets everywhere from the
guidelines.
Also removed the unneeded Requires that are brought in
automatically.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
3:40 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From pertusus(a)free.fr 2008-01-14 04:39 EST -------
rpmlint still says:
xdvik.src:17: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes xdvi
xdvik.src:18: W: unversioned-explicit-provides xdvi
xdvik.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 43, tab: line 5)
Regarding the unversionned obsolete and requires I don't know
if it is right or not, given that the package name may change
in the future and become xdvi.
Unless somebody else disagrees, and with the patch applied, this is
APPROVED
I'd like to be comaintainer. Jindrich, don't you want too?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
4:14 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
pertusus(a)free.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |pertusus(a)free.fr
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flag| |fedora-review+
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
8:14 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com 2008-01-14 09:14 EST
-------
OK, thanks Patrice, I'll integrate your patch later when I am home. I didn't
know about bcond, that's very useful. I'll add Patrice and Jindrich as
co-maintainers, unless Jindrich tells me not to.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
10:20 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From jnovy(a)redhat.com 2008-01-14 11:20 EST -------
Not a problem with comaintenance. Thanks Jonathan for packaging xdvi separately!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
3:50 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com 2008-01-14 16:50 EST
-------
(In reply to comment #13)
Regarding the unversionned obsolete and requires I don't know
if it is right or not, given that the package name may change
in the future and become xdvi.
I am inclined to simply change it to
Provides: xdvi = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoloetes: xdvi < 22.84.12
Objections?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
4:14 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From pertusus(a)free.fr 2008-01-14 17:14 EST -------
A first note is that it seems to me that 22.84.12 should
be obsoleted (if xdvi is).
The issue I see is that the xdvi package exists and it
is a different upstream. However I can't see a reason why
somebody would want to package it. In fact it may have been
unfortunate that I (I think it was me in a patch fro
texlive.spec) called it xdvi and not xdvik. However it is
not that obvious since it certainly makes sense to have
yum install xdvi installs xdvik.
Maybe one possibility could be to drop completely the
Obsoletes: xdvi
and leave
Provides: xdvi = %{version}-%{release}
This will hurt the rawhide texlive users but maybe it would be
better. Another possiblity could be
Obsoloetes: xdvi = 22.84.12
That way the xdvi in rawhide is obsoleted without much side-effect.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
4:39 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com 2008-01-14 17:39 EST
-------
(In reply to comment #17)
A first note is that it seems to me that 22.84.12 should
be obsoleted (if xdvi is).
Yes, sorry, I meant Obsoletes: xdvi <=22.84.12
The issue I see is that the xdvi package exists and it
is a different upstream. However I can't see a reason why
somebody would want to package it.
Yes.. but it's dead upstream ... no release since 2004... xdvik is essentially
upstream now.
In fact it may have been
unfortunate that I (I think it was me in a patch fro
texlive.spec) called it xdvi and not xdvik. However it is
not that obvious since it certainly makes sense to have
yum install xdvi installs xdvik.
Yes, we definately want yum install xdvi to do the right thing.
Maybe one possibility could be to drop completely the
Obsoletes: xdvi
and leave
Provides: xdvi = %{version}-%{release}
I am happy with that...
This will hurt the rawhide texlive users but maybe it would be
better.
I don't think it will, since the xdvi in rawhide is at version 22.84.12-8.fc9,
so rawhide users will just see an updated package. Did I miss something?
On balance i think the last choice is probably best
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
4:43 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com 2008-01-14 17:43 EST
-------
(In reply to comment #18)
(In reply to comment #17)
> A first note is that it seems to me that 22.84.12 should
> be obsoleted (if xdvi is).
>
Yes, sorry, I meant Obsoletes: xdvi <=22.84.12
> The issue I see is that the xdvi package exists and it
> is a different upstream. However I can't see a reason why
> somebody would want to package it.
Yes.. but it's dead upstream ... no release since 2004... xdvik is essentially
upstream now.
Ooops, I meant xdvi is dead upstream.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
4:58 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From pertusus(a)free.fr 2008-01-14 17:58 EST -------
(In reply to comment #18)
(In reply to comment #17)
I don't think it will, since the xdvi in rawhide is at version
22.84.12-8.fc9,
so rawhide users will just see an updated package. Did I miss something?
Maybe. But I recall strange things happening with real package
names always winning against versioned virtual provides, even
when the virtual provides is higher.
Anyway, I have tested that without obsoletes,
rpm -Uvh xdvik-22.84.13-3.fc9.i386.rpm
doesn't uninstall xdvi and therefore doesn't proceeds because of
conflicts.
So I guess that the Obsoletes is needed, and I think that
Obsoletes: xdvi = 22.84.12
is the cleanest.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
5 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com 2008-01-14 18:00 EST
-------
(In reply to comment #20)
Maybe. But I recall strange things happening with real package
names always winning against versioned virtual provides, even
when the virtual provides is higher.
Hm, ok, that looks like a bug to me.
Anyway, I have tested that without obsoletes,
rpm -Uvh xdvik-22.84.13-3.fc9.i386.rpm
doesn't uninstall xdvi and therefore doesn't proceeds because of
conflicts.
So I guess that the Obsoletes is needed, and I think that
Obsoletes: xdvi = 22.84.12
is the cleanest.
OK, we'll go with that, simple.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
5:07 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com 2008-01-14 18:07 EST
-------
Spec URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xdvik.spec
SRPM URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xdvik-22.84.13-4.fc9.src.rpm
* Mon Jan 14 2008 Jonathan G. Underwood <jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com> -
22.84.13-4
- Use bcond for Japanese conditional stuff (Patrice Dumas)
- Fix license (Patrice Dumas)
- Make desktop file scriplets conform to packaging guidelines (Patrice Dumas)
- Remove unneeded Requires (Patrice Dumas)
- Adjust Provides and Obsoletes of xdvi
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
5:09 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |fedora-cvs?
------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com 2008-01-14 18:09 EST
-------
New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: xdvik
Short Description: An X viewer for DVI files
Owners: jgu,pertusus,jnovy
Branches:
InitialCC:
Cvsextras Commits: yes
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
8:06 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
kevin(a)tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
------- Additional Comments From kevin(a)tummy.com 2008-01-14 21:06 EST -------
cvs done.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
3:04 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From pertusus(a)free.fr 2008-01-15 04:04 EST -------
I have added a postun script line without the corresponding
Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils >= %{desktop_file_utils_version}
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
5:51 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com 2008-01-15 06:51 EST
-------
Thanks Kevin.
Package imported into CVS and successfully built, closing bug.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
6:36 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From jnovy(a)redhat.com 2008-01-15 07:36 EST -------
Jonathan, would you mind if I commit some texlive <-> xdvi adjustments to the
newly imported xdvi?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
7:04 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com 2008-01-15 08:04 EST
-------
Sure, go ahead. I did go through the texlive xdvi patches and have included the
ones that still seemed relevant - did I miss some?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
8:13 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From jnovy(a)redhat.com 2008-01-15 09:13 EST -------
The only I added is the fix for temporary files creation in xdvizilla.
I haven't built it yet, so feel free to build it as soon as you think it's ready
:)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
4:41 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From pertusus(a)free.fr 2008-01-15 17:41 EST -------
Unless I am wrong, in your patch you also obsolete every previous
release of xdvi, although we agreed to obsolete only the
version that went into rawhide... Is it on purpose?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
5:52 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com 2008-01-15 18:52 EST
-------
Actually, we also still have a broken upgrade path as well:
# yum --nogpgcheck localinstall xdvik-22.84.13-6.fc9.x86_64.rpm
Loading "dellsysidplugin" plugin
Loading "fastestmirror" plugin
Setting up Local Package Process
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* livna: rpm.livna.org
* dell-software: linux.dell.com
* fedora: ftp.linux.org.uk
* adobe-linux-i386: linuxdownload.adobe.com
* fwupdate: linux.dell.com
* updates: ftp.linux.org.uk
Examining xdvik-22.84.13-6.fc9.x86_64.rpm: xdvik - 22.84.13-6.fc9.x86_64
Marking xdvik-22.84.13-6.fc9.x86_64.rpm to be installed
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package tetex-xdvi.x86_64 0:3.0-44.3.fc8 set to be updated
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Dependencies Resolved
=============================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
=============================================================================
Installing:
tetex-xdvi x86_64 3.0-44.3.fc8 updates 906 k
Transaction Summary
=============================================================================
Install 1 Package(s)
Update 0 Package(s)
Remove 0 Package(s)
Total download size: 906 k
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
(1/1): tetex-xdvi-3.0-44. 100% |=========================| 906 kB 00:07
Running rpm_check_debug
Running Transaction Test
Finished Transaction Test
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/bin/pxdvi-xaw3d.bin from install of tetex-xdvi-3.0-44.3.fc8.x86_64
conflicts with file from package xdvi-22.84.12-5.fc9.x86_64
file /usr/bin/pxdvizilla from install of tetex-xdvi-3.0-44.3.fc8.x86_64
conflicts with file from package xdvi-22.84.12-5.fc9.x86_64
file /usr/bin/xdvi-xaw3d.bin from install of tetex-xdvi-3.0-44.3.fc8.x86_64
conflicts with file from package xdvi-22.84.12-5.fc9.x86_64
file /usr/bin/xdvizilla from install of tetex-xdvi-3.0-44.3.fc8.x86_64
conflicts with file from package xdvi-22.84.12-5.fc9.x86_64
file /usr/share/applications/tetex-xdvi.desktop from install of
tetex-xdvi-3.0-44.3.fc8.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
xdvi-22.84.12-5.fc9.x86_64
file /usr/share/man/man1/xdvi.1.gz from install of
tetex-xdvi-3.0-44.3.fc8.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
xdvi-22.84.12-5.fc9.x86_64
file /usr/share/texmf/pxdvi/vfontmap from install of
tetex-xdvi-3.0-44.3.fc8.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
xdvi-22.84.12-5.fc9.x86_64
file /usr/share/texmf/pxdvi/vfontmap.sample from install of
tetex-xdvi-3.0-44.3.fc8.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
xdvi-22.84.12-5.fc9.x86_64
Error Summary
-------------
It seems the obsoloetes for tetex-xdvi are not working, for reasons that I don't
understand.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
5:54 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com 2008-01-15 18:54 EST
-------
Ah, ok, ignore that, I had accidentally disabled the development repo, and had
the F8 repo enabled.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
6:04 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com 2008-01-15 19:04 EST
-------
yum --nogpgcheck --enablerepo=development localinstall
xdvik-22.84.13-6.fc9.x86_64.rpm
Loading "dellsysidplugin" plugin
Loading "fastestmirror" plugin
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* livna: rpm.livna.org
* dell-software: linux.dell.com
* fedora: ftp.linux.org.uk
* adobe-linux-i386: linuxdownload.adobe.com
* development: ftp.heanet.ie
* fwupdate: linux.dell.com
* updates: ftp.linux.org.uk
Setting up Local Package Process
Examining xdvik-22.84.13-6.fc9.x86_64.rpm: xdvik - 22.84.13-6.fc9.x86_64
Marking xdvik-22.84.13-6.fc9.x86_64.rpm to be installed
Package xdvi - 22.84.12-9.fc9.x86_64 already installed and latest version
Nothing to do
So, we still aren't obsoleting the old version of xdvi.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
4:27 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From pertusus(a)free.fr 2008-01-16 05:27 EST -------
My tests show that it works as intended. Both with
Obsoletes: xdvi = 22.84.12
Obsoletes: xdvi < %{version}
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
5:33 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com 2008-01-16 06:33 EST
-------
Yes, looks like a dep resolving bug with yum when doing localinstall.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
6:02 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From pertusus(a)free.fr 2008-01-16 07:02 EST -------
(In reply to comment #29)
The only I added is the fix for temporary files creation in
xdvizilla.
I haven't built it yet, so feel free to build it as soon as you think it's
ready :)
Jindrich, any reason why you extended the obsoletes to cover
< %{version} and not only 22.84.12?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
3:32 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From jnovy(a)redhat.com 2008-01-18 04:32 EST -------
Jindrich, any reason why you extended the obsoletes to cover
< %{version} and not only 22.84.12?
I tried to fix the tetex-xdvi obsoletion of the current xdvik, but it apparently
didn't fix the problem.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
7:33 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From jnovy(a)redhat.com 2008-01-18 08:33 EST -------
The problem described in comment #31 is caused by the fact that tetex-xdvi
obsoletes xdvik so that it wants to remove this newly imported xdvik and replace
it by tetex-xdvi when F8 repo is enabled. I'll update/remove the obsoletes on
the tetex side so that this won't happen.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
7:52 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From pertusus(a)free.fr 2008-01-18 08:52 EST -------
Indeed, this is a good example of unversioned obsoletes being
harmfull...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
10:06 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-18 11:06 EST
-------
Yeah, recently I am repeatly seeing the updates message like
=============================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
=============================================================================
Installing:
tetex-xdvi i386 3.0-44.3.fc8 koji-8-updates 830 k
replacing xdvik.i386 22.84.13-6.fc9
Updating:
authconfig i386 5.3.20-1.fc9 koji-rawhide 414 k
Then on next update xdvik obsoletes tetex-xdvi.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
3:36 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From pertusus(a)free.fr 2008-01-18 16:36 EST -------
(In reply to comment #38)
The problem described in comment #31 is caused by the fact that
tetex-xdvi
obsoletes xdvik so that it wants to remove this newly imported xdvik and replace
it by tetex-xdvi when F8 repo is enabled. I'll update/remove the obsoletes on
the tetex side so that this won't happen.
Ok to set
Obsoletes: xdvi = 22.84.12
in xdvik?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
6:10 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From jnovy(a)redhat.com 2008-01-21 07:10 EST -------
(In reply to comment #41)
Ok to set
Obsoletes: xdvi = 22.84.12
in xdvik?
It's ok with me.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
7:14 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From pertusus(a)free.fr 2008-01-21 08:14 EST -------
I commited it. I don't thin k it is worth a rebuild, will appear in next
rebuild anyway.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
7:10 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
--- Comment #44 from Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com> 2011-10-21
08:10:00 EDT ---
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: xdvik
New Branches: el6
Owners: jgu
InitialCC: jnovy pertusus
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7:11 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9:42 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
--- Comment #45 from Jon Ciesla <limb(a)jcomserv.net> 2011-10-21 10:42:03 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4630
days inactive
6014
days old
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
47 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Red Hat Bugzilla