Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: libidn2 - Library to support IDNA2008 internationalized domain names
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861
Summary: Review Request: libidn2 - Library to support IDNA2008 internationalized domain names Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla@linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: ---
Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/libidn2.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/libidn2-0.3-1.src.rpm Description: Libidn2 is an implementation of the IDNA2008 specifications in RFC 5890, 5891, 5892 and 5893 for internationalized domain names (IDN).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861
Mario Blättermann mariobl@freenet.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mariobl@freenet.de
--- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann mariobl@freenet.de 2011-05-08 09:30:40 EDT --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3058125
$ rpmlint -v * libidn2.i686: I: checking libidn2.i686: I: checking-url http://www.josefsson.org/libidn2/ (timeout 10 seconds) libidn2.src: I: checking libidn2.src: I: checking-url http://www.josefsson.org/libidn2/ (timeout 10 seconds) libidn2.src: I: checking-url http://www.josefsson.org/libidn2/releases/libidn2-0.3.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) libidn2-debuginfo.i686: I: checking libidn2-debuginfo.i686: I: checking-url http://www.josefsson.org/libidn2/ (timeout 10 seconds) libidn2-devel.i686: I: checking libidn2-devel.i686: I: checking-url http://www.josefsson.org/libidn2/ (timeout 10 seconds) libidn2.spec: I: checking-url http://www.josefsson.org/libidn2/releases/libidn2-0.3.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
No issues so far.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861
Mario Blättermann mariobl@freenet.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |mariobl@freenet.de Flag| |fedora-review?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861
Mario Blättermann mariobl@freenet.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann mariobl@freenet.de 2011-05-08 11:17:54 EDT --- --------------------------------- key:
[+] OK [.] OK, not applicable [X] needs work ---------------------------------
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. GPLv3+ [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source. $ md5sum * 98f3f31312376e398f6e51aff2ac93c1 libidn2-0.3.tar.gz 98f3f31312376e398f6e51aff2ac93c1 libidn2-0.3.tar.gz.packaged
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. - Succesful Koji build available, see above. [.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, ... [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. [.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. [.] MUST: If a package installs files below %{_datadir}/icons, the icon cache must be updated. [+] MUST: Packages storing shared library files (not just symlinks) must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. [.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ... [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Packages must not provide RPM dependency information when that information is not global in nature, or are otherwise handled. [.] MUST: When filtering automatically generated RPM dependency information, the filtering system implemented by Fedora must be used. [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. [+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [+] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), ... [+] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives. [.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file [.] MUST: .desktop files must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[.] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream...
[+] SHOULD: Timestamps of files should be preserved. Explicitely called with INSTALL='install -p' [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See Koji build above (which uses mock anyway) [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. I assume the packager has tested it. [.] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [.] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [.] SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg. [.] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin ... [+] SHOULD: Your package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts.
----------------
PACKAGE APPROVED
----------------
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861
Robert Scheck redhat@linuxnetz.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #3 from Robert Scheck redhat@linuxnetz.de 2011-05-08 15:06:20 EDT --- Mario, thank you very much for the review.
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: libidn2 Short Description: Library to support IDNA2008 internationalized domain names Owners: robert Branches: el4 el5 el6 f13 f14 f15 InitialCC:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861
--- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu 2011-05-10 12:06:17 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-16 14:13:42 EDT --- libidn2-0.4-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libidn2-0.4-1.fc15
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-16 14:14:04 EDT --- libidn2-0.4-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libidn2-0.4-1.fc14
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-16 14:14:25 EDT --- libidn2-0.4-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libidn2-0.4-1.fc13
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-16 20:50:50 EDT --- libidn2-0.4-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-18 17:35:35 EDT --- libidn2-0.4-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libidn2-0.4-1.fc15
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-18 17:35:55 EDT --- libidn2-0.4-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libidn2-0.4-1.fc14
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-18 17:36:15 EDT --- libidn2-0.4-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libidn2-0.4-1.fc13
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-18 17:37:02 EDT --- libidn2-0.5-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libidn2-0.5-1.el6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-18 17:37:23 EDT --- libidn2-0.5-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libidn2-0.5-1.el5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-18 17:37:56 EDT --- libidn2-0.5-1.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libidn2-0.5-1.el4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-28 19:55:44 EDT --- libidn2-0.5-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |libidn2-0.5-1.fc13 Resolution| |ERRATA Last Closed| |2011-05-28 19:55:49
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-28 20:00:18 EDT --- libidn2-0.5-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|libidn2-0.5-1.fc13 |libidn2-0.5-1.fc14
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-28 20:03:20 EDT --- libidn2-0.5-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|libidn2-0.5-1.fc14 |libidn2-0.5-1.fc15
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-06-06 17:34:37 EDT --- libidn2-0.5-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|libidn2-0.5-1.fc15 |libidn2-0.5-1.el4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-06-06 17:34:52 EDT --- libidn2-0.5-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|libidn2-0.5-1.el4 |libidn2-0.5-1.el6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-06-06 17:35:23 EDT --- libidn2-0.5-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|libidn2-0.5-1.el6 |libidn2-0.5-1.el5
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org