Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042
Summary: Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tagoh@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: ---
Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/vlgothic-fonts/vlgothic-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/vlgothic-fonts/vlgothic-fonts-20090204-1.fc10.... Description: VLGothic provides Japanese TrueType fonts from the Vine Linux project. Most of the glyphs are taken from the M+ and Sazanami Gothic fonts, but some have also been improved by the project.
This package will replaces VLGothic-fonts package during the package renaming transition because of applying new font packaging policy.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redh | |at.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |tagoh@redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net 2009-02-04 16:09:12 EDT --- I'd have used vl-gothic not vlgothic but your choice is ok too.
Upgrade paths work and the package looks sane.
(catalogue is probably leftover cruft since you don't use it, and checking the package is ok would be easier if you used the same line order as the template, but that does not change the result)
☾☾☾ APPROVED ☾☾☾
Please do not forget to update comps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2009-02-06 07:46:27 EDT --- Thank you for review.
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vlgothic-fonts Short Description: Japanese TrueType fonts Owners: tagoh Branches: devel F-10 F-9 InitialCC: fonts-sig i18n-team
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042
Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2009-02-08 16:58:13 EDT --- cvs done.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
--- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2009-02-10 07:11:14 EDT --- Thanks. packages has been built.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2009-02-15 21:21:09 EDT --- BTW I don't see lowercase name in bugzilla though, is it intentional or?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042
--- Comment #6 from Toshio Kuratomi tkuratom@redhat.com 2009-02-16 16:48:38 EDT --- I've renamed the VLGothic-fonts entry in bugzilla to vlgothic-fonts. It's not possible in bugzilla to have two components that only differ in case so hopefully this is fine.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs@redhat.com | |, | |ryo-dairiki@users.sourcefor | |ge.net, tagoh@redhat.com Component|Package Review |vlgothic-fonts AssignedTo|tagoh@redhat.com |ryo-dairiki@users.sourcefor | |ge.net
--- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2009-02-18 03:50:27 EDT --- Thanks. but strangely I don't see either of them at the component list at search page only. though it's available at the combo box on show_bug.cgi and submit-bug page.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042
--- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2009-02-18 15:29:13 EDT --- Did you hit the "Refresh Components/Versions/Milestones" button ? You have to do that anytime you change between redhat and fedora components.
I see the lowercase one here in that list.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042
--- Comment #9 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2009-02-18 21:05:20 EDT --- Ah, thanks. I wasn't aware of that. yes, it works fine after hitting a button.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--- Comment #10 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2009-02-18 21:19:01 EDT --- forgot to get back the flag to avoid a confusion..
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org