[Bug 909802] New: Review Request: ghc-unix-time - Unix time parser/formatter and utilities
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909802
Bug ID: 909802 Summary: Review Request: ghc-unix-time - Unix time parser/formatter and utilities Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: petersen@redhat.com
Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org//ghc-unix-time.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org//ghc-unix-time-0.1.4-1.fc18.src.rpm
Description: Fast parser, formatter, and utilities for Unix time
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909802
--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com --- This package built on koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4948697
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909802
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |haskell-devel@lists.fedorap | |roject.org Alias| |ghc-unix-time Whiteboard| |Ready
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909802
--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com --- Needed by ghc-fast-logger.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909802
Michel Alexandre Salim michel+fdr@sylvestre.me changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |michel+fdr@sylvestre.me Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |michel+fdr@sylvestre.me Flags| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim michel+fdr@sylvestre.me --- Taking this review
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909802
Michel Alexandre Salim michel+fdr@sylvestre.me changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? | Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim michel+fdr@sylvestre.me --- Review done, package is APPROVED -- note that 0.1.5 is out, please update when importing
vi Package Review ==============
Key: [x] = Pass [!] = Fail [-] = Not applicable [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====
Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Note: Documentation size is 163840 bytes in 21 files. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: No rpmlint messages.
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [!]: Latest version is packaged. 0.1.5 is out [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic: [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint ------- Checking: 0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- Cannot parse rpmlint output:
Requires --------
Provides --------
MD5-sum check ------------- http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/unix-time/0.1.4/unix-time-0.1.4.... : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 855bed734cccd25bce95c36d306acf11cb29e9c760bee863239f4c594e4e1fa9 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 855bed734cccd25bce95c36d306acf11cb29e9c760bee863239f4c594e4e1fa9
Generated by fedora-review 0.4.0 (660ce56) last change: 2013-01-29 Buildroot used: fedora-18-x86_64 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 909802
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909802
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com --- (In reply to comment #4)
Review done, package is APPROVED -- note that 0.1.5 is out, please update when importing
Okay, thanks!
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-unix-time Short Description: Fast parser, formatter, and utilities for Unix time Owners: petersen Branches: f19 f18 f17 el6 InitialCC: haskell-sig
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909802
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909802
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909802
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-unix-time-0.1.5-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-unix-time-0.1.5-1.fc17
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909802
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-unix-time-0.1.5-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-unix-time-0.1.5-1.fc18
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909802
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Whiteboard|Ready |
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909802
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909802
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-unix-time-0.1.5-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909802
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2013-04-04 19:52:05
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909802
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-unix-time-0.1.5-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909802
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-unix-time-0.1.5-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Red Hat Bugzilla