Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195015
Summary: Review Request: xpa Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink@leemhuis.info ReportedBy: spr@astrax.fis.ucm.es QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com
Spec URL: http://t-rex.fis.ucm.es/~spr/xpa.spec SRPM URL: http://t-rex.fis.ucm.es/~spr/xpa-2.1.6-2.fc5.src.rpm Description: The XPA messaging system provides seamless communication between many kinds of Unix programs, including X programs and Tcl/Tk programs. It also provides an easy way for users to communicate with these XPA-enabled programs by executing XPA client commands in the shell or by utilizing such commands in scripts. Because XPA works both at the programming level and the shell level, it is a powerful tool for unifying any analysis environment: users and programmers have great flexibility in choosing the best level or levels at which to access XPA services, and client access can be extended or modified easily at any time.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xpa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195015
------- Additional Comments From paul@city-fan.org 2006-06-14 09:47 EST ------- *** Bug 195016 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xpa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195015
michael@knox.net.nz changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink@leemhuis.info |michael@knox.net.nz OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From michael@knox.net.nz 2006-06-17 04:24 EST ------- * RPM name is OK * Source xpa-2.1.6.tar.gz is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of xpa-devel looks OK * rpmlint of xpa looks OK * File list of xpa-devel looks OK * File list of xpa looks OK
I would recommend you just add some white space between the %package devel and %description devel. Same again for %install and %clean, just improves the flow and readability of your spec file.
If you make those changes, I see no reason why I can't approve this package.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xpa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195015
------- Additional Comments From spr@astrax.fis.ucm.es 2006-06-19 05:13 EST ------- I have made the changes you recommend:
http://t-rex.fis.ucm.es/~spr/xpa.spec http://t-rex.fis.ucm.es/~spr/xpa-2.1.6-3.fc5.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xpa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195015
michael@knox.net.nz changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From michael@knox.net.nz 2006-06-21 18:34 EST ------- Thank you. You can consider this APPROVED.
Please close this bug report with NEXTRELEASE once imported into CVS.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xpa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195015
spr@astrax.fis.ucm.es changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xpa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195015
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xpa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195015
sergio.pasra@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
------- Additional Comments From sergio.pasra@gmail.com 2008-07-16 15:34 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: foobar New Branches: EL-5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xpa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195015
kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
------- Additional Comments From kevin@tummy.com 2008-07-16 20:08 EST ------- I take it you meant the Package Name to be xpa here?
cvs done.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org