[Bug 727087] New: Review Request: perl-Alien-SDL - Building, finding and using SDL binaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Alien-SDL - Building, finding and using SDL binaries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727087
Summary: Review Request: perl-Alien-SDL - Building, finding and using SDL binaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: ---
SRPM: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Alien-SDL-1.428-1.fc14.src.rpm SPEC: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Alien-SDL.spec Description: Aliasing is the phenomenon where two different expressions actually refer to the same thing. Modifying one will modify the other, and if you take a reference to both, the two values are the same.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727087
Marcela Mašláňová mmaslano@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |727049
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727087
Bug 727087 depends on bug 727049, which changed state.
Bug 727049 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Patch - Patches text with given patch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727049
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727087
Petr Sabata psabata@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |psabata@redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |psabata@redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727087
--- Comment #1 from Petr Sabata psabata@redhat.com 2011-08-04 06:29:03 EDT --- Package: perl-Alien-SDL Version: 1.428 Release: 1.fc14 Sources: Alien-SDL-1.428.tar.gz Patches: ---------- Package successfully built in mock, fedora-rawhide-x86_64. Package successfully built in mock, fedora-rawhide-i386. Package successfully built in koji, dist-rawhide.
MUST items: [ OK ] Package does NOT include pre-built binaries or libraries [ OK ] Spec file is legible and written in American english [ OK ] Package successfully builds on at least one supported primary architecture [ -- ] All ExcludeArch tags valid, referencing proper bug reports [ OK ] Package obeys FHS (with _libexecdir and /srv exceptions) [ NOTE ] No errors reported by rpmlint [ OK ] Changelog present and properly formatted [ OK ] Package does NOT include Packager, Vendor, Copyright or PreReq tags [ OK ] Source tags are working URLs and sources match upstream or justified otherwise [ FAIL ] Requires correct or justified otherwise [ NOTE ] BuildRequires correct or justified otherwise [ OK ] All file names are in proper UTF-8 encoding [ OK ] All plain text failes are in proper UTF-8 encoding [ -- ] Large documentation files are located in doc subpackage [ OK ] All documentation prefixed with %doc [ OK ] Documentation is NOT executable [ OK ] No files in %doc are needed at run-time [ -- ] Compiler flags honor Fedora defaults or are justified [ -- ] Package generates useful debuginfo packages [ -- ] Header files are placed in devel subpackage [ -- ] Unversioned shared libraries are placed in devel subpackage [ -- ] Pkgconfig files are placed in devel subpackage [ -- ] Full-versioned Requires of the base package in subpackages [ -- ] Package calls ldconfig in post and postun sections for all subpackages, if applicable [ -- ] Static libraries are provided by static subpackage [ OK ] Package contains no static executables unless approved by FESCo [ OK ] Package does NOT bundle any system libraries [ -- ] RPath not used for anything besides internal libraries [ -- ] All config files are marked noreplace or justified otherwise [ OK ] No config files are located under /usr [ -- ] Package contains working systemd unit files and requires systemd-units [ -- ] All systemd unit files are named according to the Guidelines [ -- ] Package contains a SystemV-compatible initscript only as an optional addition to systemd unit files [ -- ] If package contains an initscript, it's placed in sysvinit subpackage [ -- ] A GUI application installs a proper desktop file [ -- ] All desktop files are installed by desktop-file-install or justified otherwise [ OK ] Package consistently uses macros [ -- ] makeinstall macro is used only if make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} does NOT work [ -- ] Macros in Summary and description are expandable at build-time [ -- ] globals used in place of defines [ -- ] Locales handled correctly -- package requires gettext and uses find_lang, if applicable [ -- ] Scriptlets are sane [ OK ] Package is not relocatable unless justified [ OK ] Package contains only acceptable code or content [ OK ] Package owns all the files and directories it creates, installs and/or uses unless those are already owned by another package [ OK ] files sections do NOT contain duplicate files except for licenses [ OK ] Package does NOT cause any conflicts [ OK ] Package does NOT contain kernel modules [ OK ] Package does NOT bundle fonts or other general purpose data [ FAIL ] Final Requires and Provides are sane
SHOULD items: [ OK ] The Summary does NOT end with a period [ OK ] Package does NOT include BuildRoot tag, clean section or buildroot removal in install section [ OK ] Package should preserve files timestamps [ OK ] Package does NOT explicitly BuildRequire bash, bzip2, coreutils, cpio, diffutils, fedora-release, findutils, gawk, gcc, gcc-c++, grep, gzip, info, make, patch, redhat-rpm-config, rpm-build, sed, shadow-utils, tar, unzip, util-linux-ng, which or xz [ OK ] Description does NOT consist of lines longer than 80 characters [ -- ] Package uses parallel make [ -- ] In case of a web application, package installs date into /usr/share instead of /var/www [ -- ] All patches have a comment or an upstream bug link [ -- ] Package installs manpages for all executables [ OK ] Package contains check section and all tests pass [ ?? ] Package works as expected
NOTES: ------ rpmlint issues: - incorrect FSF address; contact upstream about this - README file contains CRLF line endings; convert it to LF-only, please
requires: Most of the explicitly specified runtime dependencies are automatically picked by RPM, thus adding duplicates to the runtime dependencies list. There's also an underspecified dependency you should filter out. Please, remove perl(Capture::Tiny), perl(File::Spec), perl(File::Temp), and perl(File::Which) (this one is not used at all) from Requires. In addition, perl(File::Path) >= 2.08, perl(File::Fetch) >= 0.24, and perl(Text::Patch) >= 1.4 should be required and their underspecified deps filtered out...
buildrequires: perl(File::Spec::Functions) dependency is missing. Moreover, many of the listed build-time dependencies aren't used at all. They're just mentioned in the META files (e.g. Archive::* stuff). But maybe I'm just missing something.
Not approving at the moment.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727087
--- Comment #2 from Marcela Mašláňová mmaslano@redhat.com 2011-08-04 09:20:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1)
Package: perl-Alien-SDL Version: 1.428 Release: 1.fc14 Sources: Alien-SDL-1.428.tar.gz Patches:
NOTES:
rpmlint issues:
- incorrect FSF address; contact upstream about this
They have broken bz, but hopefully, they will regenerate their package once.
- README file contains CRLF line endings; convert it to LF-only, please
Fixed.
requires: Most of the explicitly specified runtime dependencies are automatically picked by RPM, thus adding duplicates to the runtime dependencies list. There's also an underspecified dependency you should filter out. Please, remove perl(Capture::Tiny), perl(File::Spec), perl(File::Temp), and perl(File::Which) (this one is not used at all) from Requires. In addition, perl(File::Path) >= 2.08, perl(File::Fetch) >= 0.24, and perl(Text::Patch) >= 1.4 should be required and their underspecified deps filtered out...
Removed.
buildrequires: perl(File::Spec::Functions) dependency is missing.
Added.
Moreover, many of the listed build-time dependencies aren't used at all. They're just mentioned in the META files (e.g. Archive::* stuff). But maybe I'm just missing something.
They are in inc directory.
Not approving at the moment.
Please, approve now. http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Alien-SDL-1.428-1.fc17.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727087
Petr Sabata psabata@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Petr Sabata psabata@redhat.com 2011-08-04 09:38:38 EDT --- Okay, it looks better now.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727087
Marcela Mašláňová mmaslano@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from Marcela Mašláňová mmaslano@redhat.com 2011-08-04 10:01:27 EDT --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Alien-SDL Short Description: Building, finding and using SDL binaries Owners: mmaslano ppisar psabata Branches: F-16 InitialCC: perl-sig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727087
--- Comment #5 from Marcela Mašláňová mmaslano@redhat.com 2011-08-04 10:20:44 EDT --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Alien-SDL Short Description: Building, finding and using SDL binaries Owners: mmaslano ppisar psabata Branches: f16 InitialCC: perl-sig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727087
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net 2011-08-04 10:26:51 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727087
Marcela Mašláňová mmaslano@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Last Closed| |2011-08-05 07:09:59
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Red Hat Bugzilla