Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Archive-RPM - Work with an RPM Alias: perl-Archive-RPM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497686
Summary: Review Request: perl-Archive-RPM - Work with an RPM Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Archive-RPM OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl@alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Archive-RPM.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Archive-RPM-0.04-1.fc10.src.rpm
Description: Archive::RPM provides a more complete method of accessing an RPM's meta- and actual data. We access this information by leveraging RPM2 where we can, and by "exploding" the rpm with rpm2cpio and cpio when we need information we can't get through RPM2.
Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1321073
*rt-0.07
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497686
Iain Arnell iarnell@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |iarnell@gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |iarnell@gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell iarnell@gmail.com 2009-04-26 04:44:15 EDT --- + source files match upstream. 54cc46c5e670796ebd2134f83b0d8a346bfb447c Archive-RPM-0.04.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + summary is OK. + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + build root is OK. + license field matches the actual license. LGPLv2+
+ license is open source-compatible. + license text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package builds in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1321073
+ package installs properly. + rpmlint has no complaints: perl-Archive-RPM.noarch: I: checking perl-Archive-RPM.src: I: checking 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
+ final provides and requires are sane: perl(Archive::RPM) = 0.04 perl(Archive::RPM::ChangeLogEntry) = 0.04 perl-Archive-RPM = 0.04-1.fc12
= cpio perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Archive::RPM::ChangeLogEntry) perl(DateTime) perl(English) perl(File::Temp) perl(Moose) perl(MooseX::AttributeHelpers) perl(MooseX::Types::DateTimeX) perl(MooseX::Types::Path::Class) perl(Path::Class) perl(RPM2) >= 0.67 perl(namespace::clean) perl(overload) rpm rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1
+ %check is present and all tests pass. t/00-load.t ........... ok t/100-archive-rpm.t ... ok t/101-archive-srpm.t .. ok t/102-changelog.t ..... ok All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=28, 5 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.01 sys + 4.67 cusr 0.49 csys = 5.22 CPU) Result: PASS
+ no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no generically named files + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
APPROVED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497686
--- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl cweyl@alumni.drew.edu 2009-04-27 12:02:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Archive-RPM Short Description: Work with an RPM Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497686
Chris Weyl cweyl@alumni.drew.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497686
Chris Weyl cweyl@alumni.drew.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |484485
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497686
Chris Weyl cweyl@alumni.drew.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |484485 Depends on|484485 |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497686
Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2009-04-28 23:11:00 EDT --- cvs done.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497686
Chris Weyl cweyl@alumni.drew.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
--- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl cweyl@alumni.drew.edu 2009-05-01 23:51:56 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-)
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org