https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901106
Bug ID: 1901106 Summary: Review Request: rust-pam-sys - FFI rust crate Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ed-fedora@s5h.net QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://www.usenix.org.uk/rpm/rust-pam-sys.spec SRPM URL: http://www.usenix.org.uk/rpm/rust-pam-sys-0.5.6-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: Rust FFI wrappers for the Linux Pluggable Authentication Modules Fedora Account System Username: eneville
This is a dependency for rust-pam.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901106
ed-fedora@s5h.net ed-fedora@s5h.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901106
Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 zebob.m@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zebob.m@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 zebob.m@gmail.com --- - You should specify what you patched in a comment:
# Initial patched metadata # Bump blah to X, PR: https://... Patch0: pam-sys-fix-metadata.diff
Patching libc is unnecessary:
[dependencies.libc] -version = "0.2.39" +version = "0.2"
0.2.39 will work with any patch number below 0.3
- You must include the license files with %license in %files devel:
%files devel %license LICENSE-APACHE LICENSE-MIT
- You should include CHANGELOG.md in %doc
%doc CHANGELOG.md README.md
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901106
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 zebob.m@gmail.com --- - You need to add a Requires for pam in the devel subpackage:
%package devel Summary: %{summary} BuildArch: noarch Requires: pam-devel
%description devel %{_description}
- You should BuildRequires pam-devel like this:
%generate_buildrequires %cargo_generate_buildrequires echo 'pam-devel'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901106
--- Comment #3 from ed-fedora@s5h.net ed-fedora@s5h.net --- Thanks for looking, I believe the changes are now ready in the following:
Spec URL: http://www.usenix.org.uk/rpm/rust-pam-sys.spec SRPM URL: http://www.usenix.org.uk/rpm/rust-pam-sys-0.5.6-1.fc35.src.rpm Description: Rust FFI wrappers for the Linux Pluggable Authentication Modules
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901106
Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 zebob.m@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |zebob.m@gmail.com Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 zebob.m@gmail.com --- Package approved. You still need to find a sponsor as described in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901106
Rémi Lauzier remilauzier@protonmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1941896 CC| |remilauzier@protonmail.com
--- Comment #5 from Rémi Lauzier remilauzier@protonmail.com --- *** Bug 1943989 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941896 [Bug 1941896] Review Request: rust-rudo - rudo is a small equivalent of sudo writen in rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901106
Rémi Lauzier remilauzier@protonmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1944463
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944463 [Bug 1944463] Review Request: rust-pam-client - Application API wrapper to Pluggable Authentication Modules (PAM)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901106
Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 zebob.m@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901106
Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 zebob.m@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 zebob.m@gmail.com --- Sponsored.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901106
--- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla gwync@protonmail.com --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-pam-sys
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901106
Orion Poplawski orion@nwra.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(ed-fedora@s5h.net | |) CC| |orion@nwra.com
--- Comment #8 from Orion Poplawski orion@nwra.com --- Robert-André - Are you still interested in rust packaging for Fedora?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901106
ed-fedora@s5h.net ed-fedora@s5h.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(ed-fedora@s5h.net | |) |
--- Comment #9 from ed-fedora@s5h.net ed-fedora@s5h.net --- This is here https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-pam-sys, please let me know if I've misunderstood.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901106
Fabio Valentini decathorpe@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |decathorpe@gmail.com Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Status|POST |CLOSED Last Closed| |2022-08-16 20:51:56
--- Comment #10 from Fabio Valentini decathorpe@gmail.com --- The only thing that's missing here is to close the bug, since the package was imported to Fedora.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org