Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Package Review: ibus-table-wubi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488172
Summary: Package Review: ibus-table-wubi Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: petersen@redhat.com ReportedBy: cchance@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, petersen@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com, cchance@redhat.com, phuang@redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs@redhat.com Depends on: 488010 Blocks: 484650 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: ---
A split from ibus-table-chinese, which was sub-package of ibus-table.
Uploading srpm and spec.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488172
Caius "kaio" Chance cchance@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Package Review: |Package Review: |ibus-table-wubi |ibus-table-zhengma
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488172
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|petersen@redhat.com |nobody@fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488172
Bug 488172 depends on bug 488010, which changed state.
Bug 488010 Summary: Review Request: ibus-table-cangjie - Cang Jie input method for ibus-table. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488010
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488172
--- Comment #1 from Caius "kaio" Chance cchance@redhat.com 2009-04-01 22:47:49 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-zhengma-1.1.0.20090402-... Spec URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-zhengma.spec Description: A split from ibus-table-chinese, which was sub-package of ibus-table.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488172
Parag AN(पराग) panemade@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade@gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |panemade@gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) panemade@gmail.com 2009-04-03 01:43:11 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1274694 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 5981da2341988d13ebd0c6c01bcb047f ibus-table-zhengma-1.1.0.20090402.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + ibus-table-createdb scriptlet used. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App.
Suggestions: 1) check header of zhengma.txt table file. Can you confirm license with upstream if it really is GPLv3+? 2) try adding contents to Changelog file in upstream and add it as %doc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488172
Parag AN(पराग) panemade@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review-
--- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) panemade@gmail.com 2009-04-06 23:47:40 EDT --- Looks like patent problem here.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488172
--- Comment #5 from Caius "kaio" Chance cchance@redhat.com 2009-04-07 01:37:22 EDT --- Patent should be expired in DEC 09.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org