Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: tumbler - D-Bus service for applications to request thumbnails
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549593
Summary: Review Request: tumbler - D-Bus service for applications to request thumbnails Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sundaram@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: ---
Spec URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/tumbler.spec SRPM URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/tumbler-0.1.0-2.fc13.src.rpm Description:
Tumbler is a D-Bus service for applications to request thumbnails for various URI schemes and MIME types. It is an implementation of the thumbnail management D-Bus specification described on http://live.gnome.org/ThumbnailerSpec written in an object-oriented fashion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549593
--- Comment #2 from Debarshi Ray debarshi.ray@gmail.com 2010-01-15 16:49:11 EST --- I anyway needed to build this after I updated my laptop so thought I might as well help you along.
Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/tumbler.spec SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/tumbler-0.1.1-1.fc12.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549593
--- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert cwickert@fedoraproject.org 2010-01-25 21:12:03 EST --- Rahul, please update your package or update the one from Debarshi according to my comments from comment 1. Builds fine in mock now, I guess this was a rawhide problem.
Additionally there still is a missing builddep for the jpeg plugin:
Build Configuration: * Debug: minimum Plugins: * GdkPixbuf thumbnailer plugin: yes * FreeType font thumbnailer plugin: yes * JPEG thumbnailer plugin with EXIF support: no * Freedesktop.org cache plugin: yes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549593
Christoph Wickert cwickert@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(sundaram@redhat.c | |om)
--- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert cwickert@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-24 20:12:34 EST --- Any progress on this?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549593
Rahul Sundaram metherid@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |metherid@gmail.com
--- Comment #5 from Rahul Sundaram metherid@gmail.com 2010-02-25 02:52:11 EST ---
Sorry for the delay and the spec was missing a few BR's that have been added now
http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/tumbler.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/tumbler-0.1.1-2.fc12.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549593
Christoph Wickert cwickert@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(sundaram@redhat.c | |om) |
--- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert cwickert@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-27 18:43:48 EST --- OK - MUST: named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: spec file name matches the base package %{name} OK - MUST: package meets the Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: license file included in %doc OK - MUST: spec is in American English OK - MUST: spec is legible OK - MUST: sources match the upstream source by MD5 f3f9c549ddac430904f61d80ebf7d1ac OK - MUST: successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on x86_64 OK - MUST: no ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. OK - MUST: handles locales properly with %find_lang OK - MUST: calls ldconfig in %post and %postun OK - MUST: does not bundle copies of system libraries. OK - MUST: not designed to be relocatable OK - MUST: owns all directories that it creates OK - MUST: no duplicate files in the %files listing OK - MUST: permissions on files are set properly, includes %defattr(...) OK - MUST: package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. OK - MUST: consistently uses macros OK - MUST: package contains code, or permissable content N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application OK - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package OK - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix, then library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package. OK - MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file OK - MUST: package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: all filenames valid UTF-8
SHOULD Items: OK - SHOULD: Source package includes license text(s) as a separate file. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: functions as described. OK - SHOULD: Scriptlets are sane. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK - SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg OK - SHOULD: no file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin
Other items: OK - latest stable version OK - SourceURL valid OK - Compiler flags ok OK - Debuginfo complete
Issues: - License tag should be GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ because the libs are LGPLv2+ and only tumblerd is GPLv2+
- make is not verbose (V=1)
- $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/tumbler-* tumbler.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install tumbler.src: W: no-buildroot-tag tumbler.src:15: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 15, tab: line 1) 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
Although the buildroot tag and the cleaning of buildroot are no longer required, it cant hurt to have them. Same for Same for 'Requires: pkgconfig' in the devel package.
Fix the first two, the rest is up to you.
APPROVED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549593
Rahul Sundaram metherid@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #7 from Rahul Sundaram metherid@gmail.com 2010-02-28 13:40:53 EST --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tumbler Short Description: D-Bus service for applications to request thumbnails Owners: sundaram Branches: F-12 InitialCC:
It would help at some point if one of the Xfce maintainers apply to be a co-maintainer for this one
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549593
--- Comment #8 from Christoph Wickert cwickert@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-28 13:59:15 EST --- Sure, no problem.
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tumbler Short Description: D-Bus service for applications to request thumbnails Owners: sundaram cwickert kevin Branches: F-12 InitialCC:
Do we want a F-13 branch as well?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549593
--- Comment #9 from Rahul Sundaram metherid@gmail.com 2010-02-28 14:11:02 EST --- Yep I forgot about the early branching
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tumbler Short Description: D-Bus service for applications to request thumbnails Owners: sundaram Branches: F-12 F-13 InitialCC:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549593
--- Comment #10 from Rahul Sundaram metherid@gmail.com 2010-02-28 14:12:11 EST ---
Sigh Third time should be right
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tumbler Short Description: D-Bus service for applications to request thumbnails Owners: sundaram cwickert kevin Branches: F-12 F-13 InitialCC:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549593
--- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu 2010-02-28 17:31:30 EST --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549593
Rahul Sundaram metherid@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549593
Orion Poplawski orion@cora.nwra.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orion@cora.nwra.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #12 from Orion Poplawski orion@cora.nwra.com 2011-05-20 11:40:54 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: tumbler New Branches: el6 Owners: sundaram cwickert kevin InitialCC:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549593
--- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com 2011-05-20 18:25:49 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549593
--- Comment #14 from Rahul Sundaram metherid@gmail.com 2011-05-20 18:31:16 EDT ---
umm. why am I being listed as a owner for the EL6 branch. I don't even own the other Fedora branches anymore.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org