[Bug 2241725] New: Review Request: rigsync - Rigsync keeps multiple rigs frequency and mode in sync using Hamlib
5:39 a.m.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
Bug ID: 2241725
Summary: Review Request: rigsync - Rigsync keeps multiple rigs
frequency and mode in sync using Hamlib
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: jskarvad(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: https://jskarvad.fedorapeople.org/rigsync/rigsync.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jskarvad.fedorapeople.org/rigsync/rigsync-0~20230612gitb320c4d9-1...
Description: Rigsync is a utility that keeps the frequency and mode of multiple
radios in sync. Supported radios are all those supported by whatever version of
Hamlib to which rigsync is linked.
Fedora Account System Username: jskarvad
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
4:49 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2241725] Review Request: rigsync - Rigsync keeps multiple rigs
frequency and mode in sync using Hamlib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
Pavol Zacik <pzacik(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |fedora-review?
CC| |pzacik(a)redhat.com
Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |pzacik(a)redhat.com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
5:48 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2241725] Review Request: rigsync - Rigsync keeps multiple rigs
frequency and mode in sync using Hamlib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
Petr Menšík <pemensik(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pemensik(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Petr Menšík <pemensik(a)redhat.com> ---
Virtual device to test this tool can be created by hamlib package command:
https://www.mankier.com/1/rigctlcom
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
6:23 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2241725] Review Request: rigsync - Rigsync keeps multiple rigs
frequency and mode in sync using Hamlib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
--- Comment #2 from Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Petr Menšík from comment #1)
Virtual device to test this tool can be created by hamlib package
command:
https://www.mankier.com/1/rigctlcom
It seems it can be tested even more simple way - hamlib has special dummy
device for emulation. It would be good to have it as a Beaker test in Fedora CI
:) Instructions how to test:
Create emulated radio 1 on port 8881:
$ rigctld -m 1 -t 8881
Create emulated radio 2 on port 8882:
$ rigctld -m 1 -t 8882
Enable radio synchronization via rigsync:
$ rigsync -m 2 -r localhost:8881 -m 2 -r localhost:8882
Now check the frequency of the second radio:
$ rigctl -m 2 -r localhost:8882 f
145000000
After startup it should be probably on 145 MHz.
Now retune the first radio to the 146 MHz:
$ rigctl -m 2 -r localhost:8881 F 146000000
And check the second radio that it followed and also retuned to the 146 MHz:
$ rigctl -m 2 -r localhost:8882 f
146000000
The synchronization should work both way and even with more radios. You can
e.g. define three or four emulated radios or arbitrary number. You can also try
with more frequencies and also check that the synchronization doesn't work if
the rigsync isn't running.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
2:07 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2241725] Review Request: rigsync - Rigsync keeps multiple rigs
frequency and mode in sync using Hamlib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
Pavol Zacik <pzacik(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |POST
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Pavol Zacik <pzacik(a)redhat.com> ---
Approved and writing the Beaker test.
Package Review
==============
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====
C/C++:
[-]: Provides: bundled(gnulib) in place as required.
Note: Sources not installed
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[-]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "GNU Lesser General Public License, Version 2.1", "GNU Library
General Public License v2 or later", "*No copyright* GNU Lesser
General Public License". Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/pavol/fedora/2241725-rigsync/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 3882 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
is arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: rigsync-0~20230612gitb320c4d9-1.fc40.x86_64.rpm
rigsync-debuginfo-0~20230612gitb320c4d9-1.fc40.x86_64.rpm
rigsync-debugsource-0~20230612gitb320c4d9-1.fc40.x86_64.rpm
rigsync-0~20230612gitb320c4d9-1.fc40.src.rpm
===========================================================================================================
rpmlint session starts
===========================================================================================================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp1kkh0pvn')]
checks: 31, packages: 4
rigsync.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rigsync
rigsync.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary Rigsync
rigsync.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary Rigsync
rigsync.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0-20230612gitb320c4d9-1
['0~20230612gitb320c4d9-1.fc40', '0~20230612gitb320c4d9-1']
============================================================================ 4
packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings, 0 badness; has taken
0.3 s
============================================================================
Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Checking: rigsync-debuginfo-0~20230612gitb320c4d9-1.fc40.x86_64.rpm
===========================================================================================================
rpmlint session starts
===========================================================================================================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmps42ax9w3')]
checks: 31, packages: 1
============================================================================ 1
packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken
0.1 s
============================================================================
Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts
============================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 31, packages: 3
rigsync.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rigsync
rigsync.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary Rigsync
rigsync.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0-20230612gitb320c4d9-1
['0~20230612gitb320c4d9-1.fc40', '0~20230612gitb320c4d9-1']
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings, 0 badness; has taken
0.3 s
Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/daveriesz/rigsync/archive/b320c4d9a3ced9529391ac969cc2...
:
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
5a1f859fbca03bfd429d0dc08492d8a6b47563288f91a6c0582774be7992c455
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
5a1f859fbca03bfd429d0dc08492d8a6b47563288f91a6c0582774be7992c455
Requires
--------
rigsync (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libhamlib.so.4()(64bit)
rtld(GNU_HASH)
rigsync-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
rigsync-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
Provides
--------
rigsync:
rigsync
rigsync(x86-64)
rigsync-debuginfo:
debuginfo(build-id)
rigsync-debuginfo
rigsync-debuginfo(x86-64)
rigsync-debugsource:
rigsync-debugsource
rigsync-debugsource(x86-64)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
7:01 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2241725] Review Request: rigsync - Rigsync keeps multiple rigs
frequency and mode in sync using Hamlib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
--- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad(a)redhat.com> ---
Thanks for the review.
Btw to check whether the package builds on all supported architectures:
- navigate to the directory with spec and sources
- run:
$ fedpkg --release f40 scratch-build --srpm
- and observe the koji results
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
7:10 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2241725] Review Request: rigsync - Rigsync keeps multiple rigs
frequency and mode in sync using Hamlib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
Petr Menšík <pemensik(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?
Assignee|pzacik(a)redhat.com |pemensik(a)redhat.com
Status|POST |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from Petr Menšík <pemensik(a)redhat.com> ---
Taking the review
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
7:10 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2241725] Review Request: rigsync - Rigsync keeps multiple rigs
frequency and mode in sync using Hamlib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
Petr Menšík <pemensik(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
Status|ASSIGNED |POST
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
7:42 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2241725] Review Request: rigsync - Rigsync keeps multiple rigs
frequency and mode in sync using Hamlib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
<fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rigsync
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
8:27 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2241725] Review Request: rigsync - Rigsync keeps multiple rigs
frequency and mode in sync using Hamlib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|POST |MODIFIED
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-2023-046419be4b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-046419be4b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
8:27 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2241725] Review Request: rigsync - Rigsync keeps multiple rigs
frequency and mode in sync using Hamlib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-2023-30196c5a90 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-30196c5a90
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
8:28 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2241725] Review Request: rigsync - Rigsync keeps multiple rigs
frequency and mode in sync using Hamlib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-2023-80578e0160 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-80578e0160
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
8:45 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2241725] Review Request: rigsync - Rigsync keeps multiple rigs
frequency and mode in sync using Hamlib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
--- Comment #10 from Petr Menšík <pemensik(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #4)
Thanks for the review.
Btw to check whether the package builds on all supported architectures:
- navigate to the directory with spec and sources
- run:
$ fedpkg --release f40 scratch-build --srpm
- and observe the koji results
I doubt users not yet in packagers groups are allowed koji build, even a
scratch one.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
8:51 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2241725] Review Request: rigsync - Rigsync keeps multiple rigs
frequency and mode in sync using Hamlib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-2023-046419be4b has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2023-046419be4b \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-046419be4b
See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
9:32 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2241725] Review Request: rigsync - Rigsync keeps multiple rigs
frequency and mode in sync using Hamlib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-2023-30196c5a90 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2023-30196c5a90 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-30196c5a90
See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
9:37 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2241725] Review Request: rigsync - Rigsync keeps multiple rigs
frequency and mode in sync using Hamlib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-2023-80578e0160 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2023-80578e0160 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-80578e0160
See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
8:10 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2241725] Review Request: rigsync - Rigsync keeps multiple rigs
frequency and mode in sync using Hamlib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Last Closed| |2023-10-19 01:10:41
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-2023-80578e0160 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
8:34 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2241725] Review Request: rigsync - Rigsync keeps multiple rigs
frequency and mode in sync using Hamlib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-2023-30196c5a90 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
1:34 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2241725] Review Request: rigsync - Rigsync keeps multiple rigs
frequency and mode in sync using Hamlib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-2023-046419be4b has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241725
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
232
days inactive
264
days old
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
18 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
bugzilla＠redhat.com