Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226322
Summary: Merge Review: psmisc Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nobody@fedoraproject.org QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com CC: kzak@redhat.com
Fedora Merge Review: psmisc
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/psmisc/ Initial Owner: kzak@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: psmisc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226322
ed@eh3.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: psmisc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226322
andy.grimm@ingres.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andy.grimm@ingres.com, | |ed@eh3.com
------- Additional Comments From andy.grimm@ingres.com 2007-02-03 16:24 EST ------- I reviewed this one. Just a few things:
rpmlint on ./psmisc-22.2-5.src.rpm W: psmisc summary-ended-with-dot Utilities for managing processes on your system. W: psmisc macro-in-%changelog _includedir
Please use the %{dist} in release
BuildRequires should require gettext rather than gettext-devel
Otherwise, it looks good.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: psmisc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226322
ruben@rubenkerkhof.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |kzak@redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review-
------- Additional Comments From ruben@rubenkerkhof.com 2007-02-04 13:15 EST ------- Andy, please reassign tickets back to the requester and switch the fedora-review flag to -, if you deny the request +, if you approve it.
See http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/WarrenTogami/ReviewWithFlags for more info.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: psmisc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226322
------- Additional Comments From andy.grimm@ingres.com 2007-02-05 12:07 EST ------- Ruben, sorry for not following procedure. I should have explained that I'm not sponsored yet, so I do not have access to reassign tickets.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: psmisc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226322
------- Additional Comments From kzak@redhat.com 2007-03-01 09:48 EST ------- Fixed. Update to psmisc-22.3-1.fc7. Thanks for your review.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: psmisc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226322
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium
kzak@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: psmisc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226322
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide
tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |426387 nThis| |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226322
Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dnovotny@redhat.com, | |limb@jcomserv.net
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net 2008-09-18 10:11:42 EDT --- Adding current owner.
Karel, what is the status here? I see you are the previous owner. Any objection to my taking ownership of the bug, and completing the review?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226322
Karel Zak kzak@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|kzak@redhat.com |dnovotny@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226322
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Novotny dnovotny@redhat.com 2008-09-19 06:55:13 EDT --- Jon, I am the new maintainer of psmisc. You can take the ownership and complete the review.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226322
Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|dnovotny@redhat.com |limb@jcomserv.net
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net 2008-09-19 08:35:31 EDT --- Excellent. I'll get right on it.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226322
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net 2008-09-19 09:00:44 EDT --- Full review is stellar.
One think I might ask, and it's not worth a rebuild, but could you comment in the spec on the purpose and upstream status of the patches? Just got added to the Guidelines and I think it's a good practice.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226322
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net 2008-12-04 14:35:34 EDT --- Ping?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226322
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net 2009-03-31 11:26:14 EDT --- Ping again?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226322
Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mnowak@redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(dnovotny@redhat.c | |om)
--- Comment #11 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2009-04-08 12:41:51 EDT --- Daniel, can you please follow up to Jon's proposals?
--
Also:
* Not necessary to define globally when used only for make
export CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -D_GNU_SOURCE"
also not sure whether is "-D_GNU_SOURCE" necessary, shouldn't $RPM_OPT_FLAGS take care of everything?
* don't mix variable and macro style
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D...
* %defattr(-,root,root)
A little bit old-school to me. Use
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
* point URL field to http://sourceforge.net/projects/psmisc/ the present one is useless (bogus content there)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226322
Daniel Novotny dnovotny@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(dnovotny@redhat.c | |om) |
--- Comment #12 from Daniel Novotny dnovotny@redhat.com 2009-05-06 09:58:21 EDT --- hello,
I made the suggested .spec changes:
* added purpose comments to all patches * fixed URL * fixed %defattr
as for the others:
- Not necessary to define globally when used only for make
configure and autoreconf doesn't use those? I'm not sure...
- don't mix variable and macro style
as far as I can see, there's only variable style for those two variables
output: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dnovotny/psmisc.review.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226322
--- Comment #13 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2009-05-06 10:12:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12)
[...] output: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dnovotny/psmisc.review.spec
Looks good to me. (Don't forget tu bump changelog entry when in CVS, please.)
Jon: Are you satisfied? Will you approve it, or should I?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226322
Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net 2009-05-07 12:57:52 EDT --- I'm happy. Commit.
APPROVED.
Thanks everyone!
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org