Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220218
Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Find - Find and use installed modules in a (sub)category Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpo@di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com
Spec URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Module-Find.spec
SRPM URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Module-Find-0.05-1.src.rpm
Description: Module::Find lets you find and use modules in categories. This can be very useful for auto-detecting driver or plugin modules. You can differentiate between looking in the category itself or in all subcategories.
Note: requirement of Archive::Any --> Module::CPANTS::Analyse --> ... --> Perl::Critic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Find - Find and use installed modules in a (sub)category
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220218
panemade@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |panemade@gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From panemade@gmail.com 2006-12-19 20:55 EST ------- will review this
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Find - Find and use installed modules in a (sub)category
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220218
panemade@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From panemade@gmail.com 2006-12-20 01:55 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMS. + source files match upstream. 1b756c84e476fc8179fcf2699a4d1a86 Module-Find-0.05.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + %check used PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/1-use..............ok t/2-find.............ok t/3-usesub...........ok t/4-useall...........ok t/5-setmoduledirs....ok t/pod-coverage.......ok t/pod................ok All tests successful. Files=7, Tests=26, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.43 cusr + 0.12 csys = 0.55 CPU) + Provides: perl(Module::Find) = 0.05 + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Followed perl packaging guidelines. APPROVED.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Find - Find and use installed modules in a (sub)category
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220218
jpo@di.uminho.pt changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
------- Additional Comments From jpo@di.uminho.pt 2006-12-22 07:12 EST ------- Thanks for the review.
Package imported and built for FC-5, FC-6, and devel.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220218
Matthew Booth mbooth@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mbooth@redhat.com
--- Comment #4 from Matthew Booth mbooth@redhat.com 2009-09-08 06:06:01 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Module-Find New Branches: EL-5 Owners:
I would like to add virt-v2v to EL-5, which has a dependency on perl-Module-Find.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220218
Matthew Booth mbooth@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220218
--- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu 2009-09-11 16:27:53 EDT --- We need an ack from the current owner beforce branching their packages for EPEL. Have you read https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Getting_a_Fedora_package_in_EPEL?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220218
Chris Weyl cweyl@alumni.drew.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl@alumni.drew.edu
--- Comment #6 from Chris Weyl cweyl@alumni.drew.edu 2009-09-11 16:49:20 EDT --- Ack! EPEL branch here is a-ok, so long as the requester takes ownership of the new branches.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220218
Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs-
--- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu 2009-09-11 16:57:33 EDT --- Since Owners: is empty above, I'm stull not sure what to do. Matt, Chris has indicated that you should be the owner of the EPEL branch. If that's what you want, please submit a new CVS request with your FAS ID in the Owners: field.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220218
Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rjones@redhat.com
--- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com 2009-09-12 05:07:18 EDT --- Matt, you should own this one I think.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220218
--- Comment #9 from Matthew Booth mbooth@redhat.com 2009-09-15 05:21:49 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Module-Find New Branches: EL-5 Owners: mdbooth
I'm happy to take ownership of this branch.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220218
Matthew Booth mbooth@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220218
Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu 2009-09-16 17:18:55 EDT --- CVS done.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220218
Mark Chappell tremble@tremble.org.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tremble@tremble.org.uk Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #11 from Mark Chappell tremble@tremble.org.uk 2010-07-15 11:23:18 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-HTML-Format New Branches: EL-6 Owners: tremble
No response from owner, and it's going to be tied to EL-6 SRPMs anyway... https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610094
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220218
--- Comment #12 from Mark Chappell tremble@tremble.org.uk 2010-07-15 11:23:53 EDT --- Sorry that should have been https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612418
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220218
--- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2010-07-16 13:25:50 EDT --- spot seems to already own a EL-6 branch here.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220218
Mark Chappell tremble@tremble.org.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #14 from Mark Chappell tremble@tremble.org.uk 2010-07-20 03:05:05 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Module-Find New Branches: EL-6 Owners: tremble
No response from owner, and it's going to be tied to EL-6 SRPMs anyway...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220218
--- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2010-07-23 17:51:22 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org