[Bug 573826] New: Review Request: perl-Getopt-Long - Extended processing of command line options
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Getopt-Long - Extended processing of command line options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573826
Summary: Review Request: perl-Getopt-Long - Extended processing of command line options Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jan.klepek@gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Getopt-Long.spec SRPM URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Getopt-Long-2.38-1.fc11.src.r... Description: The Getopt::Long module implements an extended getopt function called GetOptions(). This function adheres to the POSIX syntax for command line options, with GNU extensions. In general, this means that options have long names instead of single letters, and are introduced with a double dash "--". Support for bundling of command line options, as was the case with the more traditional single-letter approach, is provided but not enabled by default. Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2054592 Rpmlint output: 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573826
Jan Klepek jan.klepek@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |573827
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573826
Chris Weyl cweyl@alumni.drew.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |cweyl@alumni.drew.edu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573826
Chris Weyl cweyl@alumni.drew.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573826
--- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl cweyl@alumni.drew.edu 2010-03-16 01:28:01 EDT --- Getopt::Long is part of perl core; however I'm holding off on any action here pending what comes out of the discussion going on over in the fedora perl devel list.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573826
--- Comment #2 from Jan Klepek jan.klepek@gmail.com 2010-03-16 02:23:51 EDT --- I'm sorry, I did not check if it is already as part of core, I did check pkgdb and yum (which for yum install perl-Getopt-Long, did not find anything) which discussion? you mean about dual lived modules which was raised by Marcela?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573826
Iain Arnell iarnell@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |iarnell@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell iarnell@gmail.com 2010-03-16 11:47:56 EDT --- Indeed, it would be Marcela's dual lived modules thread. But you've inadvertently raised a point that we've overlooked - not all core modules have their own sub-packages. As it stands, a separate perl-Getopt-Long rpm would conflict with the existing files in the core perl rpm itself. Back to the list for some more discussion.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573826
--- Comment #4 from Marcela Mašláňová mmaslano@redhat.com 2010-03-19 09:44:47 EDT --- Anyway in perl-5.10.1 is the same version (2.38). Do you still need it? Perl-5.10.0 contains 2.37.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573826
Jan Klepek jan.klepek@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Red Hat Bugzilla