[Bug 1643705] New: Review Request: python-PyLEMS - LEMS interpreter implemented in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643705
Bug ID: 1643705 Summary: Review Request: python-PyLEMS - LEMS interpreter implemented in Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: sanjay.ankur@gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-PyLEMS/python-PyLEMS.spec SRPM URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-PyLEMS/python-PyLEMS-0.4.9.1-1.fc...
Description: A LEMS (http://lems.github.io/LEMS) simulator written in Python which can be used to run NeuroML2 (http://neuroml.org/neuroml2.php) models.
Fedora Account System Username: ankursinha
Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=30499016
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643705
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.ankur@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1276941 (fedora-neuro)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276941 [Bug 1276941] Fedora NeuroImaging and NeuroScience tracking bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643705
--- Comment #1 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.ankur@gmail.com --- Fedora 29 scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=30499092
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643705
Luis Segundo luis@blackfile.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |luis@blackfile.net Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |luis@blackfile.net
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643705
Luis Segundo luis@blackfile.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |POST Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Luis Segundo luis@blackfile.net --- Package approved.
Package Review ==============
Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====
Generic: [ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "GPL (v3)", "Unknown or generated". 64 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/luis/1643705-python- PyLEMS/licensecheck.txt [ ]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [ ]: Changelog in prescribed format. [ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [ ]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package [ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [ ]: Package does not generate any conflict. [ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [ ]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files. [ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python: [ ]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [ ]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [ ]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic: [ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [ ]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python3-PyLEMS , python-PyLEMS-doc , python2-PyLEMS [ ]: Package functions as described. [ ]: Latest version is packaged. [ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [ ]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [ ]: %check is present and all tests pass. [ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint ------- Checking: python3-PyLEMS-0.4.9.1-1.fc28.noarch.rpm python-PyLEMS-doc-0.4.9.1-1.fc28.noarch.rpm python2-PyLEMS-0.4.9.1-1.fc28.noarch.rpm python-PyLEMS-0.4.9.1-1.fc28.src.rpm python3-PyLEMS.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pylems python2-PyLEMS.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pylems 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- python3-PyLEMS.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/LEMS/pylems/ <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> python3-PyLEMS.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pylems python2-PyLEMS.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/LEMS/pylems/ <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> python2-PyLEMS.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pylems python-PyLEMS-doc.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/LEMS/pylems/ <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
Requires -------- python3-PyLEMS (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/python2 python(abi) python3dist(lxml) python3dist(matplotlib) python3dist(numpy)
python2-PyLEMS (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/python2 python(abi) python2dist(lxml) python2dist(matplotlib) python2dist(numpy)
python-PyLEMS-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
Provides -------- python3-PyLEMS: python3-PyLEMS python3.6dist(pylems) python3dist(pylems)
python2-PyLEMS: python-PyLEMS python2-PyLEMS python2.7dist(pylems) python2dist(pylems)
python-PyLEMS-doc: python-PyLEMS-doc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643705
--- Comment #3 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.ankur@gmail.com --- Thanks for the quick review, Luis! Requesting SCM now.
Cheers, Ankur
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643705
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-PyLEMS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643705
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|POST |MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- python-PyLEMS-0.4.9.1-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-9929cd1bd9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643705
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- python-PyLEMS-0.4.9.1-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-bad753c336
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643705
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- python-PyLEMS-0.4.9.1-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-8223488506
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643705
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.ankur@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |python-PyLEMS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643705
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- python-PyLEMS-0.4.9.1-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-8223488506
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643705
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- python-PyLEMS-0.4.9.1-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-bad753c336
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643705
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- python-PyLEMS-0.4.9.1-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-9929cd1bd9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643705
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2018-11-10 21:40:27
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- python-PyLEMS-0.4.9.1-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643705
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- python-PyLEMS-0.4.9.1-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643705
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- python-PyLEMS-0.4.9.1-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
bugzilla＠redhat.com