Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Ouch - Exceptions that don't hurt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697401
Summary: Review Request: perl-Ouch - Exceptions that don't hurt Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: psabata@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: ---
Spec URL: http://psabata.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Ouch/perl-Ouch.spec SRPM URL: http://psabata.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Ouch/perl-Ouch-0.0300-1.fc14.s... Description: Ouch provides a class for exception handling that doesn't require a lot of boilerplate, nor any up front definition. If Exception::Class is working for you, great! But if you want something that is faster, easier to use, requires less typing, and has no prereqs, but still gives you much of that same functionality, then Ouch is for you.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697401
Marcela Mašláňová mmaslano@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Marcela Mašláňová mmaslano@redhat.com 2011-04-18 04:45:05 EDT --- - rpmlint OK - package must be named according to Guidelines OK - spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK - package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK - package must be licensed with Fedora approved license OK - license field must match actual license OK - text of the license in its own file must be included in %doc OK - sources must match the upstream source OK - package MUST successfully compile and build OK - architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla OK - build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires OK - handle locales properly with %find_lang macro OK - shared library files must call ldconfig in %post(un) OK - packages must NOT bundle system libraries OK - package must own all directories that it creates OK - permissions on files must be set properly OK - package must consistently use macros OK - package must contain code, or permissable content OK - large documentation must go in a -doc OK - %doc must not affect the runtime of the application OK - header files must be in a -devel package OK - static libraries must be in a -static package OK - library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel OK - devel package usually require base package OK - packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives OK - GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file OK - packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK
APPROVED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697401
Petr Sabata psabata@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #2 from Petr Sabata psabata@redhat.com 2011-04-18 05:02:01 EDT --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Ouch Short Description: Exceptions that don't hurt Owners: psabata mmaslano ppisar Branches: f14 f15 InitialCC: perl-sig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697401
--- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu 2011-04-18 14:12:06 EDT --- This review is not assigned to anyone. It should be assigned to the reviewer. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Reviewer
Please fix and re-raise the fedora-cvs flag.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697401
Marcela Mašláňová mmaslano@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |mmaslano@redhat.com Flag| |fedora-cvs?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697401
--- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu 2011-04-19 14:12:34 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697401
--- Comment #5 from Petr Sabata psabata@redhat.com 2011-04-20 05:22:24 EDT --- Thanks for the review and the repo!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697401
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697401
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-20 05:25:30 EDT --- perl-Ouch-0.0300-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Ouch-0.0300-1.fc14
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697401
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-20 05:26:01 EDT --- perl-Ouch-0.0300-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Ouch-0.0300-1.fc15
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697401
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-20 15:22:30 EDT --- perl-Ouch-0.0300-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697401
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-26 12:25:29 EDT --- perl-Ouch-0.0300-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697401
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |perl-Ouch-0.0300-1.fc15 Resolution| |ERRATA Last Closed| |2011-04-26 12:25:34
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697401
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-28 23:23:25 EDT --- perl-Ouch-0.0300-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697401
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|perl-Ouch-0.0300-1.fc15 |perl-Ouch-0.0300-1.fc14
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org