Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913004
Bug ID: 913004 Summary: Review Request: perl-re-engine-RE2 - RE2 regex engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: bochecha@fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-re-engine-RE2.spec SRPM URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-re-engine-RE2-0.11-1.fc19.src...
Description: This module replaces perl's regex engine in a given lexical scope with RE2.
Fedora Account System Username: bochecha
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913004
--- Comment #1 from Mathieu Bridon bochecha@fedoraproject.org --- I made a couple of adjustments, so here is the new submission.
Spec URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-re-engine-RE2.spec SRPM URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-re-engine-RE2-0.11-2.fc19.src...
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913004
Petr Šabata psabata@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |psabata@redhat.com Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |psabata@redhat.com Flags| |fedora-review?
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913004
Petr Šabata psabata@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? | Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Petr Šabata psabata@redhat.com --- Ok, no issues with your package.
Perhaps doing plain "rm -r re2" in %prep would make the patch more readable. Just a personal opinion.
Approving.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913004
Mathieu Bridon bochecha@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW Flags| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #3 from Mathieu Bridon bochecha@fedoraproject.org --- (In reply to comment #2)
Ok, no issues with your package.
Wait, I didn't forget any BuildRequires this time? \o/
Perhaps doing plain "rm -r re2" in %prep would make the patch more readable. Just a personal opinion.
I thought about that, but I like the idea of just applying patches and nothing else in the spec file, as much as possible.
Also, it feels weird to patch the MANIFEST so it doesn't include the re2 folder anymore, while the folder itself is removed outside of the patch.
But yeah, it does make a world of difference concerning the readability of the patch, which is very important for something like that (unbundling can be tricky, I'd be happier if others can review the patch, so I should do what I can to make that easier).
So I'll change that when importing the package.
Approving.
Thanks Petr!
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: perl-re-engine-RE2 Short Description: RE2 regex engine Owners: bochecha Branches: devel InitialCC: perl-sig
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913004
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913004
Mathieu Bridon bochecha@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed| |2013-03-07 01:27:01
--- Comment #5 from Mathieu Bridon bochecha@fedoraproject.org --- Thanks for the Git process Jon.
Package built in Rawhide, closing.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org