Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542
--- Comment #117 from Miroslav Suchý msuchy@redhat.com 2011-10-24 15:36:06 EDT --- hylafax.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary hylafax hylafax.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary faxsetup.linux hylafax.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary faxmsg hylafax.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ondelay hylafax.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary probemodem hylafax.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lockname hylafax.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary typetest I encourage you to write man page for this executables.
hylafax.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/hylafax-5.5.0/COPYRIGHT You have there probably DOS/WINDOWS style of end of line.
It is preferred to use %global rather then %define http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_...
Is there some reason to specify /usr/bin/tiffcp instead of libtiff-tools?
I'm going to talk to jskala (as he is the same building as me) about the conflicts and virtual providess.
I second that change the name to hylafax+ is probably best thing.
I briefly read all this BZ (as it is very long) and still does not understand (even after reading #92) why that stuff in /usr/spool/ is there? Can you elaborate why it could not be moved to /etc /usr/bin /var/log etc? And I'm sorry in advance, if you will repeat yourself and I missed it.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org