[Bug 889261] New: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-lsf - Globus Toolkit - LSF Job Manager Support
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261
Bug ID: 889261 Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-lsf - Globus Toolkit - LSF Job Manager Support Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: mattias.ellert@fysast.uu.se
Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-job-manager-lsf.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-1.1-1.fc17.src....
Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause.
The globus-gram-job-manager-lsf package contains: LSF Job Manager Support
This is a new package in Globus Toolkit 5.2.3 that reintroduces the support for LSF, replacing the obsolete globus-gram-job-manager-setup-lsf package
Fedora Account System Username: ellert
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261
--- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ellert@fysast.uu.se --- Now with aarch64 support:
Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-job-manager-lsf.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-1.1-2.fc18.src....
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261
Björn Esser bjoern.esser@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bjoern.esser@gmail.com Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |bjoern.esser@gmail.com Flags| |fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261
--- Comment #2 from Björn Esser bjoern.esser@gmail.com --- configure-script throws some warnings during build:
checking for mpiexec... no checking for mpirun... configure: WARNING: Cannot locate mpiexec no configure: WARNING: Cannot locate mpirun configure: WARNING: Using default lsf profile of /etc/profile.lsf checking for bsub... configure: WARNING: Unable to read lsf.profile, manual configuration needed no checking for bqueues... configure: WARNING: Cannot locate bsub no checking for bjobs... configure: WARNING: Cannot locate bqueues no checking for bkill... configure: WARNING: Cannot locate bjobs no checking for bhist... configure: WARNING: Cannot locate bkill no checking for bacct... configure: WARNING: Cannot locate bhist no configure: WARNING: Cannot locate bacct
rpmlint complains:
Rpmlint ------- Checking: globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-1.1-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-poll-1.1-2.fc20.noarch.rpm globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-seg-1.1-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm globus-gram-job-manager-lsf.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided globus-gram-job-manager-setup-lsf-doc globus-gram-job-manager-lsf.x86_64: E: no-binary globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-poll.noarch: W: no-documentation globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-seg.x86_64: W: no-documentation globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-seg.x86_64: E: zero-length /etc/globus/scheduler-event-generator/available/lsf 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 3 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint globus-gram-job-manager-lsf globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-s etup-poll globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-seg globus-gram-job-manager-lsf.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided globus-gram-job-manager-setup-lsf-doc globus-gram-job-manager-lsf.x86_64: E: no-binary globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-poll.noarch: W: no-documentation globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-seg.x86_64: W: no-documentation globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-seg.x86_64: E: zero-length /etc/globus/scheduler-event-generator/available/lsf 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 3 warnings.
Does globus-gram-job-manager-lsf really need to be arched? It contains no arched binaries...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261
--- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ellert@fysast.uu.se --- That the LSF client tools are not found during the build is not fatal.
The only implication of this is that the paths to these tools are not preconfigured in the installed configuration file. These can be added by the sysadmin after installation. If left unconfigured, $PATH will be searched for them at runtime.
globus-gram-job-manager-lsf should be noarch, but it can not be. If one of the subpackages built from a source rpm is arched, the main package can not be noarch. This is a known deficiency of rpm. (A noarch tag in the main package would apply to all sub-packages built form the srpm.)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261
--- Comment #4 from Björn Esser bjoern.esser@gmail.com --- Package has some issues.
#####
Package Review ==============
Legend: [x] = Pass [!] = Fail [-] = Not applicable [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed
Issues: ======= - Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) Note: globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-seg : /usr/lib64/libglobus_seg_lsf.la See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#StaticLibraries
---> please remove this at the end of %install.
- Arched BuildRequires in spec: BuildRequires: globus-core%{?_isa} >= 8 BuildRequires: globus-gram-protocol-devel%{?_isa} >= 11 BuildRequires: globus-scheduler-event-generator-devel%{?_isa} >= 4 BuildRequires: globus-common-devel%{?_isa} >= 14 BuildRequires: globus-xio-devel%{?_isa} >= 3 BuildRequires should not be arched.
---> Please fix.
- zero-length /etc/globus/scheduler-event-generator/available/lsf
---> consider packaging this file %ghost and touching it in %post
===== MUST items =====
C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [-]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required
---> el5
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in globus- gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-poll
---> subpkg is noarch
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated". 3 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bjoern.esser/fedora/review/889261-globus-gram-job-manager- lsf/licensecheck.txt
---> License-Tag is fine.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. [x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: No %config files under /usr. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
Perl: [x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Requires:.
---> pulled through other BRs
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic: [-]: Buildroot is not present Note: Buildroot: present but not needed
---> el5
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [-]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
---> el5
[x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Uses parallel make. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic: [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint ------- Checking: globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-1.1-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-poll-1.1-2.fc20.noarch.rpm globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-seg-1.1-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm globus-gram-job-manager-lsf.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided globus-gram-job-manager-setup-lsf-doc globus-gram-job-manager-lsf.x86_64: E: no-binary globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-poll.noarch: W: no-documentation globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-seg.x86_64: W: no-documentation globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-seg.x86_64: E: zero-length /etc/globus/scheduler-event-generator/available/lsf 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 3 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint globus-gram-job-manager-lsf globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-s etup-poll globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-seg globus-gram-job-manager-lsf.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided globus-gram-job-manager-setup-lsf-doc globus-gram-job-manager-lsf.x86_64: E: no-binary globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-poll.noarch: W: no-documentation globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-seg.x86_64: W: no-documentation globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-seg.x86_64: E: zero-length /etc/globus/scheduler-event-generator/available/lsf 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 3 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:'
Requires -------- globus-gram-job-manager-lsf (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): config(globus-gram-job-manager-lsf) globus-common-progs globus-gass-cache-program globus-gatekeeper globus-gram-job-manager globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup globus-gram-job-manager-scripts perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) perl(Config) perl(Globus::Core::Config) perl(Globus::Core::Paths) perl(Globus::GRAM::Error) perl(Globus::GRAM::JobManager) perl(Globus::GRAM::JobState) perl(IPC::Open3)
globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-poll (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh config(globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-poll) globus-gram-job-manager-lsf globus-gram-job-manager-scripts
globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-seg (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh /sbin/ldconfig config(globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-seg) globus-common(x86-64) globus-gram-job-manager-lsf(x86-64) globus-gram-job-manager-scripts globus-scheduler-event-generator(x86-64) globus-scheduler-event-generator-progs initscripts libc.so.6()(64bit) libglobus_common.so.0()(64bit) libglobus_common.so.0(GLOBUS_COMMON_14)(64bit) libglobus_scheduler_event_generator.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH)
Provides -------- globus-gram-job-manager-lsf: config(globus-gram-job-manager-lsf) globus-gram-job-manager-lsf globus-gram-job-manager-lsf(x86-64) globus-gram-job-manager-setup-lsf perl(Globus::GRAM::JobManager::lsf)
globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-poll: config(globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-poll) globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-poll
globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-seg: config(globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-seg) globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-seg globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-seg(x86-64) libglobus_seg_lsf.so.1()(64bit)
Source checksums ---------------- http://www.globus.org/ftppub/gt5/5.2/5.2.3/packages/src/globus_gram_job_mana... : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 6f4026909496d2e4b0e29ae7881d5ee5486f392423aed17933809dfafb865127 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 6f4026909496d2e4b0e29ae7881d5ee5486f392423aed17933809dfafb865127
Generated by fedora-review 0.4.1 (b2e211f) last change: 2013-04-29 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 889261
#####
Please fix the issues and I'll grant review.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261
--- Comment #5 from Björn Esser bjoern.esser@gmail.com --- my bad (missed to mark it passed):
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated". 3 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bjoern.esser/fedora/review/889261-globus-gram-job-manager- lsf/licensecheck.txt
---> License-Tag is fine.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261
--- Comment #6 from Björn Esser bjoern.esser@gmail.com ---
Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) Note: globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-seg : /usr/lib64/libglobus_seg_lsf.la See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#StaticLibraries
---> please remove this at the end of %install.
As discussed in bz #889262 there's an exception in the guidelines for globus-plugins allowing (the urgently needed) .la-files.
So this is no issue anymore.
Just fix arched-BRs and zero-length-file issue will be enough to get this granted.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261
--- Comment #7 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ellert@fysast.uu.se --- I do not understand your comment about that the BRs should not be arched. For arched packages having arched BRs is preferred. Having these BRs from a different architecture is not sufficient for the package to build.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261
--- Comment #8 from Björn Esser bjoern.esser@gmail.com --- (In reply to Mattias Ellert from comment #7)
I do not understand your comment about that the BRs should not be arched. For arched packages having arched BRs is preferred. Having these BRs from a different architecture is not sufficient for the package to build.
As far as my sponsor taught me: BRs must not be arched, because they will become the Requires of the srpm and may cause the srpm not to build (created on x86_64 and build on i686) or may pull the wrong arch during build on multi-arch (created on i686 and build on x86_64). On Koji this won't be an issue, but...
Having arched-Requires is prefered, afaik.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261
--- Comment #9 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ellert@fysast.uu.se --- This does not make sense. I have never had any problem caused by having %{?_isa} in BuildRequires, and I have had many problems caused by not having them. I strongly disagree with you on this.
Especially for multiarch, having %{?_isa} is essential for getting the build dependencies right - without it, it is completely broken in this case. If you are building on x86-64 and have a BR on e.g. zlib-devel, this BR can be satisfied by zlib-devel(x86-32), and nothing will complain if zlib-devel(x86-64) is not installed if you try to build.
I have never seen any problem in koji with it.
It is true that these will get recorded in the Requries of the srpm, but this is a tiny insignificant glitch that does not cause any problems, while leaving them out can cause a huge amount of problems.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261
Simone Caronni negativo17@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |negativo17@gmail.com
--- Comment #10 from Simone Caronni negativo17@gmail.com --- Hello,
(In reply to Mattias Ellert from comment #9)
This does not make sense. I have never had any problem caused by having %{?_isa} in BuildRequires, and I have had many problems caused by not having them. I strongly disagree with you on this.
this has been discussed over and over in reviews with different opinions but in the end they should not be applied to -devel packages.
Look what happens if I download a src.rpm from Koji with _isa'ed BuildRequires:
$ rpm -qpR libguac-client-vnc-0.6.0-4.fc17.src.rpm cairo-devel(x86-64) gnutls-devel(x86-64) libguac-devel(x86-64) = 0.6.0 libvncserver-devel(x86-64) rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
This means I cannot rebuild the src.rpm if I'm on an i686? This is wrong.
Please see this bug, from comment #39 onwards where Michael Schwendt explains it more clearly:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820544
Regards, --Simone
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261
--- Comment #11 from Björn Esser bjoern.esser@gmail.com --- Regarding to [1] using arched-BRs are not allowed according to guidelines. So take them out, please.
[1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2013-June/009215.html
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261
--- Comment #12 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ellert@fysast.uu.se --- Hi again
Sorry for the delay. I found this new guideline about banning isa from BR so extremely stupid that I thought I would make an attempt to have it revoked before deliberately crippling the spec file. Unfortunately FPC is not very responsive and my ticket just sits there without any action taken.
Anyway, this is a battle I will have to have with FPC and not with you, so here is a new version of the package complying to the new guideline:
Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-job-manager-lsf.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-1.1-3.fc19.src....
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261
Björn Esser bjoern.esser@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #13 from Björn Esser bjoern.esser@gmail.com --- Package is fine, but one non-blocker:
* globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-setup-seg.x86_64: E: zero-length /etc/globus/scheduler-event-generator/available/lsf
---> fix this by echo "." >> $file at the end of %install
You can fix this in SCM, then.
This one is finally
APPROVED!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261
Mattias Ellert mattias.ellert@fysast.uu.se changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #14 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ellert@fysast.uu.se --- Thank you for the review.
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: globus-gram-job-manager-lsf Short Description: Globus Toolkit - LSF Job Manager Support Owners: ellert Branches: f18 f19 el5 el6 InitialCC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261
Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- globus-gridmap-verify-myproxy-callout-1.0-4.el5,globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-1.1-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gridmap-verify-myproxy-callou...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- globus-gridmap-verify-myproxy-callout-1.0-4.fc19,globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-1.1-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gridmap-verify-myproxy-callou...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- globus-gridmap-verify-myproxy-callout-1.0-4.el6,globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-1.1-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gridmap-verify-myproxy-callou...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- globus-gridmap-verify-myproxy-callout-1.0-4.fc18,globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-1.1-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gridmap-verify-myproxy-callou...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- globus-gridmap-verify-myproxy-callout-1.0-4.el6, globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-1.1-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |globus-gridmap-verify-mypro | |xy-callout-1.0-4.fc18 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2013-08-01 23:27:29
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- globus-gridmap-verify-myproxy-callout-1.0-4.fc18, globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-1.1-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|globus-gridmap-verify-mypro |globus-gridmap-verify-mypro |xy-callout-1.0-4.fc18 |xy-callout-1.0-4.fc19
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- globus-gridmap-verify-myproxy-callout-1.0-4.fc19, globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-1.1-3.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|globus-gridmap-verify-mypro |globus-gridmap-verify-mypro |xy-callout-1.0-4.fc19 |xy-callout-1.0-4.el5
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- globus-gridmap-verify-myproxy-callout-1.0-4.el5, globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-1.1-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|globus-gridmap-verify-mypro |globus-gridmap-verify-mypro |xy-callout-1.0-4.el5 |xy-callout-1.0-4.el6
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- globus-gridmap-verify-myproxy-callout-1.0-4.el6, globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-1.1-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Red Hat Bugzilla