Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl - Monad-transformer for Control.Exception
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630282
Summary: Review Request: ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl - Monad-transformer for Control.Exception Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mathstuf@gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl/ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl.sp... SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl/ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl-0.... Description: Provides a monad-transformer version of the @Control.Exception.catch@ function. For this, it defines the @MonadCatchIO@ class, a subset of @MonadIO@. It defines proper instances for most monad transformers in the 'mtl' library.
% lintmock fedora-14-x86_64-bb ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl.src: W: invalid-license PublicDomain ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl.src: W: strange-permission ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl.spec 0640L ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl.src: W: strange-permission MonadCatchIO-mtl-0.3.0.1.tar.gz 0640L ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl.x86_64: W: invalid-license PublicDomain ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license PublicDomain ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl-devel ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl-prof.x86_64: W: invalid-license PublicDomain ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/MonadCatchIO-mtl-0.3.0.1/libHSMonadCatchIO-mtl-0.3.0.1_p.a 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 9 warnings.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630282
Ben Boeckel mathstuf@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |630283
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630282
Ben Boeckel mathstuf@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|630283 |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630282
Ben Boeckel mathstuf@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630282
Ben Boeckel mathstuf@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630282
Ben Boeckel mathstuf@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630282
Shakthi Kannan shakthimaan@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shakthimaan@gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |shakthimaan@gmail.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630282
--- Comment #1 from Shakthi Kannan shakthimaan@gmail.com 2011-01-18 04:40:09 EST --- #001 Please use "License: Public Domain".
#002 Why do you have text enclosed in '@' in the Description? Please remove it.
#003 Please change the permission on the .spec file and .tar.gz file to 0664.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630282
Ben Boeckel mathstuf@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Ben Boeckel mathstuf@gmail.com 2011-01-18 10:51:04 EST --- (In reply to comment #1)
#001 Please use "License: Public Domain".
Ah. Oops. Needs an email to the maint to ensure it's valid for Fedora anyways.
#002 Why do you have text enclosed in '@' in the Description? Please remove it.
Used in cabal description and Haddock uses it. Missed it here
#003 Please change the permission on the .spec file and .tar.gz file to 0664.
This is my umask. Won't be a problem in Fedora's git or the lookaside cache.
I'll get around to this tonight hopefully.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630282
--- Comment #3 from Shakthi Kannan shakthimaan@gmail.com 2011-01-18 21:11:59 EST --- "Public Domain" is a valid license for Fedora:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses
#004 Please post Koji builds for F-14, EL-6.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630282
Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2002@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lakshminaras2002@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2002@gmail.com 2011-01-20 00:15:33 EST --- Hi Shakthi,
We had similar issue with ghc-failure regarding the Public Domain license.
http://www.mail-archive.com/legal@lists.fedoraproject.org/msg00377.html
The resolution was to get the license changed from PublicDomain. Ben had contacted the author and got it changed.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630282
--- Comment #5 from Shakthi Kannan shakthimaan@gmail.com 2011-01-20 00:29:29 EST --- I have sent an e-mail to the author of the project requesting for license change/clarification from PublicDomain. Awaiting a reply.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630282
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) |
--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2011-01-28 06:07:10 EST --- As earlier discussed on Fedora haskell-devel list, dropping libraries for now from the toplevel of Haskell-pkg-reviews, so we, the Haskell SIG, can focus more on getting Haskell apps into Fedora.
To get you library back under the tracker please submit a bin or binlib package that depends on this library and make this bug block that package review. It is a good idea to submit full stacks of packages and then to add the toplevel program to the tracker.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630282
--- Comment #7 from Shakthi Kannan shakthimaan@gmail.com 2011-02-06 22:00:43 EST --- Upstream has updated license to BSD3 with a new release 0.3.0.2. Can you please update your .spec file and make a new package release?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630282
Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2002@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mathstuf@gmail.co | |m)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630282
--- Comment #8 from Shakthi Kannan shakthimaan@gmail.com 2011-05-28 13:32:18 EDT --- SPEC: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl.spec SRPM: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl-0.3.0.2-1.fc1...
$ rpmlint ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl-0.3.0.2-1.fc14.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl-0.3.0.2-1.fc14.i686.rpm ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl.i686: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpmlint ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl-devel-0.3.0.2-1.fc14.i686.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl-prof-0.3.0.2-1.fc14.i686.rpm ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl-devel ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl-prof.i686: W: no-documentation ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/MonadCatchIO-mtl-0.3.0.2/libHSMonadCatchIO-mtl-0.3.0.2_p.a 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
Successful Koji builds for F-14, F-15 and F-16:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3097979 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3097982 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3097985
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630282
Shakthi Kannan shakthimaan@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|shakthimaan@gmail.com |nobody@fedoraproject.org Flag|needinfo?(mathstuf@gmail.co | |m) |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630282
Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2002@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |lakshminaras2002@gmail.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630282
--- Comment #9 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2002@gmail.com 2011-05-31 00:24:41 EDT --- Shakthi, I will review it asap. Thanks for updating the package.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630282
Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2002@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE Last Closed| |2011-06-02 06:42:24
--- Comment #10 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2002@gmail.com 2011-06-02 06:42:24 EDT --- Closing as duplicate of 710045
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 710045 ***
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org