https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418429
Bug ID: 1418429 Summary: Review Request: python-cachez - memoization cache decorator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: eharney@redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: https://eharney.fedorapeople.org/python-cachez/0.1.0-1/python-cachez.spec SRPM URL: https://eharney.fedorapeople.org/python-cachez/0.1.0-1/python-cachez-0.1.0-1... Description: Cache decorator for memoization Fedora Account System Username: eharney
This is being packaged to support an EMC driver in OpenStack Cinder. It is a requirement for python-storops.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418429
Eric Harney eharney@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1416920
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416920 [Bug 1416920] storops library missing for Cinder VNX driver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418429
Alan Pevec apevec@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |apevec@gmail.com, | |eharney@redhat.com Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |apevec@gmail.com Flags| |fedora-review? | |needinfo?(eharney@redhat.co | |m)
--- Comment #1 from Alan Pevec apevec@gmail.com ---
Source0 and Summary
please see comments in bug 1418428
Requires: python2 Requires: python3
those are not needed, they are automatically generated as python(abi) = 2.7 python(abi) = 3.5
Other than that looks good, please update the spec and srpm for the formal review.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418429
Eric Harney eharney@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(eharney@redhat.co | |m) |
--- Comment #2 from Eric Harney eharney@redhat.com --- Thanks, fixed this up and made other small changes based on bug 1418428: cleaned up summary/desc, use pypi.io URL instead of pypi.python.org.
New spec and SRPM has been uploaded here:
https://eharney.fedorapeople.org/python-cachez/0.1.0-2/python-cachez.spec
https://eharney.fedorapeople.org/python-cachez/0.1.0-2/python-cachez-0.1.0-2...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418429
Alan Pevec apevec@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Alan Pevec apevec@gmail.com --- APPROVED
Package Review ==============
Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
===== MUST items =====
Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Apache (v2.0)", "*No copyright* Apache", "*No copyright* Apache (v2)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache (v2.0)". 6 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck below. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint ------- Checking: python2-cachez-0.1.0-2.fc26.noarch.rpm python3-cachez-0.1.0-2.fc26.noarch.rpm python-cachez-0.1.0-2.fc26.src.rpm python2-cachez.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) memoize -> memorize, memoir python2-cachez.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US memoize -> memorize, memoir python3-cachez.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) memoize -> memorize, memoir python3-cachez.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US memoize -> memorize, memoir python-cachez.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) memoize -> memorize, memoir python-cachez.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US memoize -> memorize, memoir python-cachez.src:42: W: setup-not-quiet 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- python3-cachez.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) memoize -> memorize, memoir python3-cachez.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US memoize -> memorize, memoir python2-cachez.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) memoize -> memorize, memoir python2-cachez.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US memoize -> memorize, memoir 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
Requires -------- python3-cachez (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi)
python2-cachez (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi)
Provides -------- python3-cachez: python3-cachez python3.6dist(cachez) python3dist(cachez)
python2-cachez: python-cachez python2-cachez python2.7dist(cachez) python2dist(cachez)
Source checksums ---------------- https://pypi.io/packages/source/c/cachez/cachez-0.1.0.zip : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 43016507200ce6361edb4256339f4e17ce09693f42a3944eb34460651507766f CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 43016507200ce6361edb4256339f4e17ce09693f42a3944eb34460651507766f
Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1418429 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6
*No copyright* Apache --------------------- cachez-0.1.0/PKG-INFO cachez-0.1.0/cachez.egg-info/PKG-INFO cachez-0.1.0/setup.py
*No copyright* Apache (v2) -------------------------- cachez-0.1.0/README.rst
*No copyright* Apache (v2.0) ---------------------------- cachez-0.1.0/LICENSE.txt
Apache (v2.0) ------------- cachez-0.1.0/cachez.py
Unknown or generated -------------------- cachez-0.1.0/MANIFEST.in cachez-0.1.0/cachez.egg-info/SOURCES.txt cachez-0.1.0/cachez.egg-info/dependency_links.txt cachez-0.1.0/cachez.egg-info/top_level.txt cachez-0.1.0/setup.cfg cachez-0.1.0/test-requirements.txt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418429
Alan Pevec apevec@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(eharney@redhat.co | |m)
--- Comment #4 from Alan Pevec apevec@gmail.com --- Please include following patch before the initial import to allow building for EL7:
%{?python_provide:%python_provide python2-%{pypi_name}}
BuildRequires: python2-devel +BuildRequires: python-setuptools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418429
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-cachez
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418429
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- python-cachez-0.1.0-2.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-5b03c43d71
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418429
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418429
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- python-cachez-0.1.0-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-5b03c43d71
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418429
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2017-02-17 15:52:01
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- python-cachez-0.1.0-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418429
Eric Harney eharney@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(eharney@redhat.co | |m) |
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
bugzilla＠redhat.com -
Red Hat Bugzilla