Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928330
Bug ID: 928330 Summary: Review Request: webkit-sharp - .NET bindings for WebKit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: comzeradd@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: http://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/webkit-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/webkit-sharp-0.3-10.fc18.src.rpm Description: WebKit-sharp is .NET bindings for the WebKit rendering engine. Fedora Account System Username: comzeradd
This package was wrongly deprecated: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/webkit-sharp.git/tree/dead.package but it's a dependency for sparkleshare
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928330
Eric Christensen sparks@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sparks@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Eric Christensen sparks@redhat.com --- rpmlint comes back with an error.
# rpmlint webkit-sharp webkit-sharp-devel webkit-sharp.x86_64: E: no-binary webkit-sharp.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib webkit-sharp-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:'
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928330
--- Comment #2 from Nikos Roussos comzeradd@fedoraproject.org --- Yeap. This is expected behavior in mono packages https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Mono#File_Locations
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928330
Eric Christensen sparks@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |sparks@redhat.com Flags| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #3 from Eric Christensen sparks@redhat.com --- Package Review ==============
Key: [x] = Pass [!] = Fail [-] = Not applicable [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed
Issues: ======= - Package do not use a name that already exist Note: A package already exist with this name, please check https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/webkit-sharp See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Conflicting_Packag...
===== MUST items =====
Generic: [X]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [X]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [X]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [X]: Changelog in prescribed format. [X]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [X]: Development files must be in a -devel package [X]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [X]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [X]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [X]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in webkit- sharp-devel [X]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [X]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)". 1 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/echriste/928330-webkit-sharp/licensecheck.txt [-]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [X]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory names). [X]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [X]: Package does not generate any conflict. [X]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [X]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [X]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [X]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [X]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic: [!]: Uses parallel make. [!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [X]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [?]: Latest version is packaged. [!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [?]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [!]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [X]: %check is present and all tests pass. [?]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic: [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint ------- Checking: webkit-sharp-0.3-10.fc18.x86_64.rpm webkit-sharp-devel-0.3-10.fc18.x86_64.rpm webkit-sharp.x86_64: E: no-binary webkit-sharp.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib webkit-sharp-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint webkit-sharp webkit-sharp-devel webkit-sharp.x86_64: E: no-binary webkit-sharp.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib webkit-sharp-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:'
Requires -------- webkit-sharp (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): mono(gdk-sharp) mono(glib-sharp) mono(gtk-sharp) mono(mscorlib) webkitgtk
webkit-sharp-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/pkg-config pkgconfig pkgconfig(gtk-sharp-2.0) webkit-sharp
Provides -------- webkit-sharp: mono(webkit-sharp) webkit-sharp webkit-sharp(x86-64)
webkit-sharp-devel: pkgconfig(webkit-sharp-1.0) webkit-sharp-devel webkit-sharp-devel(x86-64)
MD5-sum check ------------- http://origin-download.mono-project.com/sources/webkit-sharp/webkit-sharp-0.... : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 6633630b6e4834b0f93726570d1c97e884470e3c400ae929cca2f1376b7b959a CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 6633630b6e4834b0f93726570d1c97e884470e3c400ae929cca2f1376b7b959a
Generated by fedora-review 0.4.0 (660ce56) last change: 2013-01-29 Buildroot used: fedora-18-x86_64 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 928330
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928330
Eric Christensen sparks@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |VERIFIED Flags|fedora-review? | Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Eric Christensen sparks@redhat.com --- APPROVED
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928330
Nikos Roussos comzeradd@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs?
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928330
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- No SCM request found, unsetting flag.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928330
Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928330
Nikos Roussos comzeradd@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #6 from Nikos Roussos comzeradd@fedoraproject.org --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: webkit-sharp Short Description: .NET bindings for WebKit Owners: comzeradd Branches: f18 f19
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928330
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- unretired master, f18, f17, please submit package change request for f19.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928330
Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928330
Nikos Roussos comzeradd@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #8 from Nikos Roussos comzeradd@fedoraproject.org --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: webkit-sharp New Branches: f19 Owners: comzeradd
previously deprecated package
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928330
Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags| |fedora-cvs+
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928330
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
Also, be sure to take ownership of the now-orphaned branches in pkgdb.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928330
Nikos Roussos comzeradd@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|VERIFIED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed| |2013-04-26 12:52:10
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Red Hat Bugzilla