Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Trace - A unified approach to tracing Alias: perl-Log-Trace
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493521
Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Trace - A unified approach to tracing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Log-Trace OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl@alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Log-Trace.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Log-Trace-1.070-1.fc10.src.rpm
Description: This module provides a unified approach to tracing. A script can 'use Log::Trace qw( < mode > )' to set the behaviour of the TRACE function.By default, the trace functions are exported to the calling package only. You can export the trace functions to other packages with the 'Deep' option. See the "OPTIONS" manpage for more information.
Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1272037
*rt-0.06
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493521
Parag AN(पराग) panemade@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade@gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |panemade@gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493521
--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panemade@gmail.com 2009-04-02 01:16:24 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1272037 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 773aefa7539b1857edb3e225cfbc4a22 Log-Trace-1.070.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=13, Tests=80, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.03 sys + 0.38 cusr 0.08 csys = 0.54 CPU) + Package perl-Log-Trace-1.070-1.fc11.noarch => Provides: perl(Log::Trace) = 1.070 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Fcntl) perl(strict) perl(vars)
Can you please help me understand why to use AutoProv and why not to filter and remove unnecessary provides perl(DB)?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493521
--- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl cweyl@alumni.drew.edu 2009-04-02 01:48:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1)
Can you please help me understand why to use AutoProv and why not to filter and remove unnecessary provides perl(DB)?
Sure :-) DB is used by the Perl debugger, and as such, is sometimes poked at... It shouldn't be provided by this package. In this case, turning off autoprov and manually providing perl(Log::Trace) is significantly easier than filtering the two provides autoprov finds. ...we've also done this before, e.g. perl-DateTime-Format-DBI.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493521
Parag AN(पराग) panemade@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) panemade@gmail.com 2009-04-02 03:09:31 EDT --- Thanks for explanation.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493521
--- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl cweyl@alumni.drew.edu 2009-04-02 03:13:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Log-Trace Short Description: A unified approach to tracing Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493521
Chris Weyl cweyl@alumni.drew.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493521
Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2009-04-03 16:47:26 EDT --- cvs done.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493521
Chris Weyl cweyl@alumni.drew.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
--- Comment #6 from Chris Weyl cweyl@alumni.drew.edu 2009-04-05 01:39:12 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493521
Ralf Corsepius rc040203@freenet.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203@freenet.de
--- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius rc040203@freenet.de 2009-04-05 13:19:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
Can you please help me understand why to use AutoProv and why not to filter and remove unnecessary provides perl(DB)?
Sure :-) DB is used by the Perl debugger, and as such, is sometimes poked at... It shouldn't be provided by this package. In this case, turning off autoprov and manually providing perl(Log::Trace) is significantly easier than filtering the two provides autoprov finds. ...we've also done this before, e.g. perl-DateTime-Format-DBI.
@Chis: Please understand that I do not agree with your rationale. I consider this kind of packaging to be grossly negligant sloppiness.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Red Hat Bugzilla