[Bug 1545347] New: Review Request: microdns - Minimal mDNS resolver and announcer library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545347
Bug ID: 1545347 Summary: Review Request: microdns - Minimal mDNS resolver and announcer library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: leigh123linux@googlemail.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/mircodns/1/microdns.spec
SRPM URL: https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/mircodns/1/microdns-0.0.8-...
Description: Minimal mDNS resolver and announcer library Fedora Account System Username: leigh123linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545347
Wolfgang Ulbrich fedora@raveit.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |fedora@raveit.de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545347
Wolfgang Ulbrich fedora@raveit.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545347
--- Comment #1 from Wolfgang Ulbrich fedora@raveit.de --- APPROVED!
Please fix %{buildroot}/$RPM_BUILD_ROOT issue before uploading
Package Review ==============
Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed
Issues: ======= - Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Note: Using both %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#macros - ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. Note: /sbin/ldconfig not called in libmicrodns See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Shared_Libraries
Fales positive. Rpmlint needs updating to newest scriptlets. see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Scriptlets?rd=Packaging:ScriptletSn...
===== MUST items =====
C/C++: [x]: Provides: bundled(gnulib) in place as required. Note: Sources not installed [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla upstream sources. No licenses found. Please check the source files for licenses manually. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 3 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in libmicrodns [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched.
Rpmlint ------- Checking: libmicrodns-0.0.8-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm libmicrodns-devel-0.0.8-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm microdns-0.0.8-1.fc28.src.rpm libmicrodns.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) mDNS -> mans, mdse libmicrodns.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mDNS -> mans, mdse libmicrodns.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libmicrodns.so.0.0.0 libmicrodns.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libmicrodns.so.0.0.0 libmicrodns-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib libmicrodns-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation microdns.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) mDNS -> mans, mdse microdns.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mDNS -> mans, mdse 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 6 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory libmicrodns-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/videolabs/libmicrodns/ <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> libmicrodns-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib libmicrodns-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation libmicrodns.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) mDNS -> mans, mdse libmicrodns.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mDNS -> mans, mdse libmicrodns.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/videolabs/libmicrodns/ <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> libmicrodns.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libmicrodns.so.0.0.0 libmicrodns.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libmicrodns.so.0.0.0 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 6 warnings.
Requires -------- libmicrodns-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/pkg-config libmicrodns(x86-64) libmicrodns.so.0()(64bit)
libmicrodns (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libc.so.6()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH)
Provides -------- libmicrodns-devel: libmicrodns-devel libmicrodns-devel(x86-64) pkgconfig(microdns)
libmicrodns: libmicrodns libmicrodns(x86-64) libmicrodns.so.0()(64bit)
Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/videolabs/libmicrodns//releases/download/0.0.8/microdns-0... : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 4ffbc5d9f28edfaab475112b97c6ca650261541a926b69781626661ae736fe53 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 4ffbc5d9f28edfaab475112b97c6ca650261541a926b69781626661ae736fe53
Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -v -r -n microdns -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545347
Wolfgang Ulbrich fedora@raveit.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545347
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/microdns
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545347
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- microdns-0.0.8-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-1a15d7bad0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545347
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545347
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- microdns-0.0.8-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-0b2cfbc4a9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545347
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- microdns-0.0.8-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-90b401026b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545347
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwizart@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwizart@gmail.com --- @leigh Nothing much important, but I don't get why this package name isn't libmicrodns. Specially as you are splitting a microdns sub-package without any files in it...
Before seen this review, I've done mine here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545378
Unrelated (but still related to vlc) libplacebo review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545349
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545347
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- microdns-0.0.8-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-90b401026b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545347
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- microdns-0.0.8-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-1a15d7bad0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545347
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- microdns-0.0.8-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-0b2cfbc4a9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545347
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2018-02-20 11:38:58
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- microdns-0.0.8-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545347
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- microdns-0.0.8-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545347
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- microdns-0.0.8-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
bugzilla＠redhat.com