[Bug 456138] New: Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

Summary: Review Request: edb -  Debugger based on the ptrace API
                    and QT4
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: [e-mail]
        ReportedBy: [e-mail]
         QAContact: [e-mail]
                CC: [e-mail],[e-mail]

Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/edb.spec
SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/edb-0.9.0-1.fc9.src.rpm
Description: 
On Windows, OllyDbg is the tool of choice, but there is no Linux
(or any other *nix) equivalent that I could find. Sure we have GDB,
but GDB and all it's various frontends tend to lean towards debugging
applications to which we have the source.
(and possibly more). edb is currently based on the ptrace API.

One of the main goals of this debugger is modularity.
The interface is written in QT4 and thus source portable to many platforms.
The debugger core is a plugin and the platform specific code is isolated
to just a few files, porting to a new OS would require porting these few
files and implementing a plugin which implements the 
DebuggerCoreInterface" interface. Also, because the plugins are based
on the QPlugin API, and do their work through the DebuggerCoreInterface
object, they are almost always portable with just a simple recompile.

Rebuild under koji is OK : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=730147
Rebuild under mock fedora-9-i386 is OK
Rebuild under mock fedora-8-i386 is OK
rpmlint output :
[eponyme@FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint edb-0.9.0-1.fc9.i386.rpm edb-0.9.0-1.fc9.src.rpm edb-debuginfo-0.9.0-1.fc9.i386.rpm edb-plugins-0.9.0-1.fc9.i386.rpm
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[eponyme@FEDOBOX tmp]$

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: edb -  Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2008-07-28 03:37 EST -------
Update for 0.9.1 :
Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/edb.spec
SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/edb-0.9.1-1.fc9.src.rpm

rpmlint output :
[builder@FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint edb-0.9.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm edb-0.9.1-1.fc9.src.rpm
edb-debuginfo-0.9.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm edb-plugins-0.9.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[builder@FEDOBOX tmp]$

As it's an x86 debugger, ppc and ppc64 are excluded.

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: edb -  Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2008-07-31 17:26 EST -------
Update for 0.9.2 :
Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/edb.spec
SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/edb-0.9.2-1.fc9.src.rpm

[builder@FEDOBOX rpmbuild]$ rpmlint
/home/builder/rpmbuild/SRPMS/edb-0.9.2-1.fc9.src.rpm
/home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/edb-0.9.2-1.fc9.i386.rpm
/home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/edb-plugins-0.9.2-1.fc9.i386.rpm
/home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/edb-debuginfo-0.9.2-1.fc9.i386.rpm
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[builder@FEDOBOX rpmbuild]$

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

--- Comment #3 from Nicoleau Fabien   2008-08-11 15:58:07 EDT ---
This package doesn't build on koji for x86_64 from 0.9.2 to 0.9.3.
I've contacted upstream. He is actually fixing that and will release 0.9.4 when
done.

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

--- Comment #4 from Nicoleau Fabien   2008-09-29 13:35:38 EDT ---
Update to 0.9.5 :
Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/edb.spec
SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/edb-0.9.5-1.fc9.src.rpm

Rebuild under mock is OK.
Rebuild on koji is OK :
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=850286

rpmlint output :
[builder@FEDOBOX rpmbuild]$ rpmlint
/home/builder/rpmbuild/SRPMS/edb-0.9.5-1.fc9.src.rpm
/home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/edb-0.9.5-1.fc9.i386.rpm
/home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/edb-plugins-0.9.5-1.fc9.i386.rpm
/home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/edb-debuginfo-0.9.5-1.fc9.i386.rpm
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[builder@FEDOBOX rpmbuild]$

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

--- Comment #5 from Nicoleau Fabien   2008-11-16 14:22:44 EDT ---
Update to 0.9.6 : 
Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/edb.spec
SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/edb-0.9.6-1.fc9.src.rpm

Rebuild under mock is OK.
Rebuild on koji is OK :
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=935319

rpmlint output :
[builder@FEDOBOX rpmbuild]$ rpmlint
/home/builder/rpmbuild/SRPMS/edb-0.9.6-1.fc9.src.rpm
/home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/edb-0.9.6-1.fc9.i386.rpm
/home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/edb-plugins-0.9.6-1.fc9.i386.rpm
/home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/edb-debuginfo-0.9.6-1.fc9.i386.rpm
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[builder@FEDOBOX rpmbuild]$

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

Lucian Langa  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #6 from Lucian Langa   2008-11-22 13:21:20 EDT ---
- license of this package should pe GPLv2+

- this is a GUI application without .desktop file.

- what's the purpose of edb-plugins ? As I can see edb main package cannot run
without debugger core plugin. I you're going to provide a separate  edb plugins
package shouldn't that be optional ? I think you should separate in-core
plugins from optional plugins (if it's even the case).

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

--- Comment #7 from Nicoleau Fabien   2008-11-22 20:38:31 EDT ---
Thank you for your comment.
Update :
Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/edb.spec
SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/edb-0.9.6-2.fc9.src.rpm

Changelog :
- Licence fix
- Add desktop file
- Removed separate plugin package

I removed edb-plugins as there is no real interest.

Rebuild under mock is OK.
Build on koji ij OK : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=945577

Rpmlint output :
[builder@FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint edb-0.9.6-2.fc9.i386.rpm
edb-debuginfo-0.9.6-2.fc9.i386.rpm edb-0.9.6-2.fc9.src.rpm
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

Lucian Langa  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|[e-mail]    |[e-mail]
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

Lucian Langa  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+

--- Comment #8 from Lucian Langa   2008-11-23 15:38:52 EDT ---
OK  source files match upstream:
        bf13f4ec695dd37bd01c4eff2db63ef9  debugger-0.9.6.tgz
OK  package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
OK  specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros
consistently.
OK  summary is OK.
OK  description is OK.
OK  dist tag is present.
OK  build root is OK.
OK  license field matches the actual license.
OK  license is open source-compatible.
OK  license text included in package.
OK  BuildRequires are proper.
OK  compiler flags are appropriate.
OK  %clean is present.
OK  package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
OK  package installs properly.
OK  debuginfo package looks complete.
OK  rpmlint is silent.
OK  final provides and requires are sane:
        libAnalyzer.so()(64bit)
        libBinarySearcher.so()(64bit)
        libBookmarks.so()(64bit)
        libBreakpointManager.so()(64bit)
        libCheckVersion.so()(64bit)
        libDebuggerCore.so()(64bit)
        libDumpState.so()(64bit)
        libELFBinaryInfo.so()(64bit)
        libEnvironment.so()(64bit)
        libFunctionDB.so()(64bit)
        libFunctionFinder.so()(64bit)
        libHardwareBreakpoints.so()(64bit)
        libHeapAnalyzer.so()(64bit)
        libOpcodeSearcher.so()(64bit)
        libOpenFiles.so()(64bit)
        libReferences.so()(64bit)
        libStringSearcher.so()(64bit)
        libSymbolViewer.so()(64bit)
        edb = 0.9.6-2.fc10
        edb(x86-64) = 0.9.6-2.fc10
        =
        /bin/sh
        libQtCore.so.4()(64bit)
        libQtGui.so.4()(64bit)
        libQtNetwork.so.4()(64bit)
        libc.so.6()(64bit)
        libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
        libm.so.6()(64bit)
        libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
        libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
OK  %check is not present. I was able to run application and debug a binary
file
N/A no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
OK  owns the directories it creates.
OK  doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
OK  no duplicates in %files.
OK  file permissions are appropriate.
N/A scriptlets present look OK
N/A initscript looks OK.
OK  code, not content.
OK  documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
OK  %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
OK  no headers.
OK  no pkgconfig files.
OK  no static libraries.
OK  no libtool .la files.
OK  this is a GUI application, desktop file OK

Suggestion: please see if you can provide an icon file for this package. (try
upstream, or try to find a default one)

APPROVED.

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

Nicoleau Fabien  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #9 from Nicoleau Fabien   2008-11-23 16:12:05 EDT ---
Thank you for the review Lucian. I'll ask upstream for an icon file.

New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: edb
Short Description: A debugger based on the ptrace API and Qt4
Owners: eponyme
Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10
InitialCC:

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

Dennis Gilmore  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-cvs?                 |fedora-cvs+

--- Comment #10 from Dennis Gilmore   2008-11-25 11:31:16 EDT ---
cvs done

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System   2008-11-25 14:33:01 EDT ---
edb-0.9.6-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/edb-0.9.6-2.fc9

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System   2008-11-25 14:34:09 EDT ---
edb-0.9.6-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/edb-0.9.6-2.fc8

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System   2008-11-25 14:35:19 EDT ---
edb-0.9.6-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/edb-0.9.6-2.fc10

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |ON_QA

--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System   2008-11-26 01:15:42 EDT ---
edb-0.9.6-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update edb'.  You can provide
feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-10266

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System   2008-11-26 01:16:57 EDT ---
edb-0.9.6-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update edb'.  You can provide
feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-10291

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System   2008-11-26 01:17:00 EDT ---
edb-0.9.6-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update edb'.  You can provide feedback
for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/f10/FEDORA-2008-10293

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

Lucian Langa  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ON_QA                       |ASSIGNED
               Flag|fedora-review+, fedora-cvs+ |fedora-review-, fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #17 from Lucian Langa   2008-11-26 02:25:58 EDT ---
There is a problem with this package name, edb already exists in fedora:

edb  -- A database convenience library wrapped around BDB
    EDB is a database convenience library wrapped around the Berkeley DB 2.7.7
by Sleepycat Software. It is intended to make accessing database information
portable, easy, fast and efficient.

cvs was already granted for this package, but it is conflicting with the above
package.

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

--- Comment #18 from Nicoleau Fabien   2008-11-26 06:24:54 EDT ---
:(
What can I do ? must I rename my package ?

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

Dennis Gilmore  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-cvs?                 |fedora-cvs-

--- Comment #19 from Dennis Gilmore   2008-11-26 21:37:20 EDT ---
since the package review is - cvs can not be done. please rerequest cvs when
the review is sorted out

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

Dennis Gilmore  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]
               Flag|                            |needinfo?([e-mail]
                   |                            |g)

--- Comment #20 from Dennis Gilmore   2008-11-26 21:52:04 EDT ---
I do not see any rpms with the name edb or anything in fedora providing
/usr/bin/edb  Lucian  can you please give more info on what the conflict is? 
because i do not see it.

[root@athosian ~]# yum install /usr/bin/edb
Setting up Install Process
Parsing package install arguments
No package /usr/bin/edb available.
Nothing to do
[root@athosian ~]# yum install /usr/sbin/edb
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
Setting up Install Process
Parsing package install arguments
No package /usr/sbin/edb available.
Nothing to do
[root@athosian ~]# yum install edb
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
Setting up Install Process
Parsing package install arguments
No package edb available.
Nothing to do

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

--- Comment #21 from manuel wolfshant   2008-11-26 22:17:25 EDT ---
The older edb was not included in fedora since version FC-6.

Compare
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/edb/FC-3/edb.spec?revision=1.8&...
with http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/edb/devel/edb.spec?view=markup

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

Dennis Gilmore  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #22 from Dennis Gilmore   2008-11-26 22:44:53 EDT ---
judging by http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/edb/  the old package has
not been in fedora since Fedora Core 5   in which case i think the new package
is ok.

We can always bring it up with FESCo if people disagree with that.

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

--- Comment #23 from manuel wolfshant   2008-11-26 22:48:41 EDT ---
It's a bit confusing to have the same name refer to two completely different
applications, depending on which version of the distribution you are.
Especially as the older application has not been formally abandoned / orphaned
/ whatever.

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

--- Comment #24 from Dennis Gilmore   2008-11-26 23:18:42 EDT ---
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/edb  says that its orphaned
 and its not been in fedora since FC-5  It was not marked as dead in cvs but
has not had a branch which means it did not exist in the release.  sure someone
updating from FC-5 may be surprised.  I still think that it will be ok.

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

--- Comment #25 from manuel wolfshant   2008-11-26 23:27:23 EDT ---
Indeed, I have not noticed the "orphan" status. 
For the record, I am fine with the current situation. But for the sake of the
discussion, let's presume I want to resurrect the old program. Now what ?

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

--- Comment #26 from manuel wolfshant   2008-11-26 23:30:24 EDT ---
And in any case, IF the new application retains the "edb" name, the description
from https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/edb must be fixed, as
currently it references the older application.

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

Dennis Gilmore  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?([e-mail] |
                   |g)                          |

--- Comment #27 from Dennis Gilmore   2008-11-26 23:34:15 EDT ---
If someone was to resurrect it since its not been in fedora for as long as it
has been out it would need a new review.  At which point it could be named
bdb-edb  or db4-edb  or something else. the harder part is that the binaries
will need renaming also. since im assuming both would provide /usr/bin/edb the
same is true of any upstream projects that have clashing names.

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

Lucian Langa  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review-              |fedora-review+

--- Comment #28 from Lucian Langa   2008-11-27 00:58:45 EDT ---
Thanks for sorting this out.
The description in pkgdb still points to old package.
I am going to close this review as
APPROVED.

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

--- Comment #29 from Nicoleau Fabien   2008-11-28 08:48:56 EDT ---
Hi,
As cvs and build have already been done, must I ask again a cvs request ?
How can I change summary in pkgdb page ?

Thx

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

Dennis Gilmore  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|[e-mail]         |
               Flag|fedora-cvs-                 |fedora-cvs+

--- Comment #30 from Dennis Gilmore   2008-11-28 08:57:14 EDT ---
im setting cvs back to +  and im told that the summary and description in pkgdb
will automatically be fixed when the package hits rawhide.

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

Lucian Langa  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

--- Comment #31 from Nicoleau Fabien   2008-11-30 18:01:46 EDT ---
Perhaps I've build edb for rawhide "to early". Summary and description are
still the old ones. May be it will change when I'll build an update for
rawhide.

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System   2008-12-08 08:01:20 EDT ---
edb-0.9.6-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository.  If problems
still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System   2008-12-08 08:01:35 EDT ---
edb-0.9.6-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository.  If problems
still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138

--- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System   2008-12-08 08:03:20 EDT ---
edb-0.9.6-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.