Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956669
Bug ID: 956669 Summary: Review Request: erebus - 2D real-time Role-Playing Game Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: cickumqt@gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Category: ---
Spec URL: http://cicku.me/erebus.spec SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/erebus-0.7-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Erebus is an Open Source RPG (Role-Playing Game), for PCs, smartphones, tablets and handhelds. Fedora Account System Username: cicku
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956669
Christopher Meng cickumqt@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956669
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng cickumqt@gmail.com --- Koji success:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5316703
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956669
Christopher Meng cickumqt@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956669
Antonio Trande anto.trande@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |anto.trande@gmail.com Flags| |needinfo+
--- Comment #2 from Antonio Trande anto.trande@gmail.com --- Hi Christopher. Just some initial comments:
- I see some changes about FHS fixes. In my opinion, with a single modification into 'deployment.pri' file, you can resolve all at one time ;)
- .desktop file is already in the source archive; why do you add another one as Source1 ?
- %{_datadir}/%{name} directory must be owned by the package
- In erebus_source.txt file, the developer says:
The source code is released under the GPL v3 or later. Please contact me if you have suggestions, bug fixes or whatever: mark dot harman >at ntlworld dot com .
I don't see any license file included, apart from docs/gpl.txt file that is not the GPLv3+ text file.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956669
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng cickumqt@gmail.com --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #2)
Hi Christopher. Just some initial comments:
- I see some changes about FHS fixes. In my opinion, with a single
modification into 'deployment.pri' file, you can resolve all at one time ;)
Thanks! I'm not familiar with Qt, now I remember this~
- .desktop file is already in the source archive; why do you add another one
as Source1 ?
Its bundled desktop file is invalid and doesn't match Fedora's standard, I think rewriting one is better than patching.
- %{_datadir}/%{name} directory must be owned by the package
You mean I should remove the asterisk?
- In erebus_source.txt file, the developer says:
The source code is released under the GPL v3 or later. Please contact me if you have suggestions, bug fixes or whatever: mark dot harman >at ntlworld dot com .
I don't see any license file included, apart from docs/gpl.txt file that is not the GPLv3+ text file.
Ok, I've mailed the author, hope he can fix that.
Thanks!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956669
--- Comment #4 from Antonio Trande anto.trande@gmail.com --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #3)
- .desktop file is already in the source archive; why do you add another one
as Source1 ?
Its bundled desktop file is invalid and doesn't match Fedora's standard, I think rewriting one is better than patching.
See 'desktop-file-edit' manpage.
- %{_datadir}/%{name} directory must be owned by the package
You mean I should remove the asterisk?
No. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories#Forgetting_to_Inc...
- In erebus_source.txt file, the developer says:
The source code is released under the GPL v3 or later. Please contact me if you have suggestions, bug fixes or whatever: mark dot harman >at ntlworld dot com .
I don't see any license file included, apart from docs/gpl.txt file that is not the GPLv3+ text file.
Ok, I've mailed the author, hope he can fix that.
Thanks!
This is very important.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956669
Antonio Trande anto.trande@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Whiteboard| | NotReady
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956669
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pahan@hubbitus.info changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pahan@hubbitus.info
--- Comment #5 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pahan@hubbitus.info --- $ LANG=C wget -c http://cicku.me/erebus.spec --2014-04-25 16:50:09-- http://cicku.me/erebus.spec Resolving cicku.me (cicku.me)... 37.59.54.136 Connecting to cicku.me (cicku.me)|37.59.54.136|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 2014-04-25 16:50:09 ERROR 404: Not Found.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956669
Ben Rosser rosser.bjr@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1364745
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364745 [Bug 1364745] (FE-GAMESIG) Games SIG tracker bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956669
Ben Rosser rosser.bjr@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rosser.bjr@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from Ben Rosser rosser.bjr@gmail.com --- Spec throws a 404 not found. Are you still interested in this review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956669
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbyszek@in.waw.pl changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zbyszek@in.waw.pl
--- Comment #7 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbyszek@in.waw.pl --- The answer is most likely no, cicku is MIA.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956669
Ben Rosser rosser.bjr@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed| |2018-07-26 16:45:37
--- Comment #8 from Ben Rosser rosser.bjr@gmail.com --- Well, there has been no response for a long time now so I think this can be closed as FE-DEADREVIEW.
I left it open so long because I have toyed with the idea of packaging erebus myself... however I'm not sure if/when I'll get around to it, so I may as well just close the ticket now.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org