https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517243
Bug ID: 1517243 Summary: Review Request: grace - Numerical Data Processing and Visualization Tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: bnrj.rudra@live.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
COPR: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/baptu/grace/ Description: Grace is a Motif application for two-dimensional data visualization. Grace can transform the data using free equations, FFT, cross- and auto-correlation, differences, integrals, histograms, and much more. The generated figures are of high quality. Grace is a very convenient tool for data inspection, data transformation, and for making figures for publications.
Fedora Account System Username:baptu
Additional comment: There is already a grace package in fedora. But, with best of my knowledge, it is no longer maintained(https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=grace).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517243
RudraB bnrj.rudra@live.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hardware|All |x86_64 Version|rawhide |27
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517243
Iwicki Artur fedora@svgames.pl changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora@svgames.pl
--- Comment #1 from Iwicki Artur fedora@svgames.pl --- In a situation like this you need not submit a review request. AFAIK you should first try contacting the maintainer, possibly asking for access to dist-git and offering to handle the update yourself. Should the current maintainer be non-responsive, you can file a ticket on releng pagure, requesting to be made new maintainer.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517243
--- Comment #2 from RudraB bnrj.rudra@live.com --- Iwicki, Thanks for your reply. Actually, I have raised a bug where the maintainer has not replied. Also, when I tried to edit the existing spec file, it is too complicated for me (it includes devel branch as well etc). So I have decided to make a new built.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517243
Jussi Eloranta jussi.eloranta@csun.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.eloranta@csun.edu
--- Comment #3 from Jussi Eloranta jussi.eloranta@csun.edu --- The version of grace supplied with fedora 27 is broken. Trying to run it gives:
--> Broken or incomplete installation - read the FAQ!
Using strace to see what it was doing last shows that it is looking for fonts such as:
fonts/type1/z003034l.pfa etc.
This is with grace-5.1.25-9.fc27.x86_64. The above font files were supplied with the grace rpm in fedora 26 (where it worked).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517243
--- Comment #4 from Jussi Eloranta jussi.eloranta@csun.edu --- OK, the missing fonts issue is caused by:
urw-base35-fonts noarch 20170801-2.fc27 fedora 9.9 k replacing urw-fonts.noarch 3:2.4-24.fc27
urw-fonts.noarch has the required fonts whereas urw-base35-fonts doesn't and this kills xmgrace...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517243
--- Comment #5 from RudraB bnrj.rudra@live.com --- Jussi, also, there is more to do about the spec. Like, e.g. why should I need nedit as the text editor? I am sorry for the late reply, but unfortunately, I have missed the notification.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517243
--- Comment #6 from Jussi Eloranta jussi.eloranta@csun.edu --- xmgrace does call nedit when you edit or create a set using text editor. So that is a valid dependence. Of course, one could change nedit to something more modern like gedit. I think long time ago it used to open a terminal window with vi (where most people would get stuck), so nedit is an improvement over this ;-)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517243
--- Comment #7 from RudraB bnrj.rudra@live.com --- OK, but since the maintainer is not responding to the bug, what is the best bet now? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517243#c1 ?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517243
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbyszek@in.waw.pl changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed| |2018-02-09 04:42:14
--- Comment #8 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbyszek@in.waw.pl --- If you want to carry this forward, you'll need to gain Fedora packager privileges. Have you done reviews of other packages? Please paste some links here.
I'll close this bug, because a new review is not necessary. Existing package needs to be updated instead.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org