Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446814
Summary: Review Request: emacs-lookup - Emacsen interface to look up dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tagoh@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,notting@redhat.com
Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/emacs-lookup/emacs-lookup.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/emacs-lookup/emacs-lookup-1.4.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description:
Lookup is an integrated search interface with electronic dictionaries for Emacsen. You can use various kinds of dictionaries, such as CD-ROM books and online dictionaries, in an efficient and effective manner.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: emacs-lookup - Emacsen interface to look up dictionaries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446814
tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs@math.uh.edu
------- Additional Comments From tibbs@math.uh.edu 2008-06-21 19:21 EST ------- This fails to build in mock for me; the build completes, but the final assembly process fails with:
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/share/info/dir
It's recommended that you rm -f this; whether it is generated or not depends on several things, but it should never be included in the package.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: emacs-lookup - Emacsen interface to look up dictionaries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446814
------- Additional Comments From tagoh@redhat.com 2008-06-22 23:28 EST ------- Thank you for catching this up. wasn't aware of that so that I didn't see that error here. anyway fixed in:
Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/emacs-lookup/emacs-lookup.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/emacs-lookup/emacs-lookup-1.4.1-2.fc9.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: emacs-lookup - Emacsen interface to look up dictionaries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446814
------- Additional Comments From tibbs@math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 00:26 EST ------- I had intended to get back to this with some more review commentary so we didn't have to go back and forth, but I ran out of time, sorry.
I notice that the lookup-guide.info file isn't in UTF8, and isn't in any encoding I recognize, so it doesn't render at all for me. (rpmlint complains it, of course.) Do you know what the encoding is? Is it possible to convert to UTF8 so that everyone can at least look at the file without having to set some specific encoding?
I get a "406 Not Acceptable" error when visiting the URL given in the spec. I expect that the server is trying to present a page based on my language settings, but none exists. Perhaps it would be better to simply refer directly to the Japanese page at http://openlab.jp/edict/lookup/index.html.ja. Unfortunately my Japanese is only good enough to read a few words (and most of the gairaigo) on that page, but it's obviously a reasonable page to use as the URL for this package.
Unfortunately this package fails to conform to many of the Emacs packaging guidelines given in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Emacs. The versioned dependencies are missing, the build dependencies are not correct (although the package still builds for me), there are no separate -el packages, etc. There are some pretty complete templates on the guideline page which you can copy.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446814
Tony Fu tfu@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|eng-i18n-bugs@redhat.com |fedora-i18n-bugs@redhat.com
--- Comment #4 from Tony Fu tfu@redhat.com 2008-09-09 23:07:27 EDT --- requested by Jens Petersen (#27995)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446814
Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tagoh@redhat.com)
--- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu 2008-11-07 19:38:16 EDT --- So its been over four months since I made my comments with no response. I will close this ticket soon if there is no further progress.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446814
Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(tagoh@redhat.com) |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446814
Daiki Ueno dueno@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dueno@redhat.com
--- Comment #6 from Daiki Ueno dueno@redhat.com 2010-04-06 03:12:11 EDT --- I've just packaged Lookup 2.0 beta, which is a major rewrite of 1.4 and works much more seamlessly with Emacs 23. Here are spec and SRPM:
Spec URL: http://www.unixuser.org/~ueno/software/fedora/lookup/emacs-lookup.spec SRPM URL: http://www.unixuser.org/~ueno/software/fedora/lookup/emacs-lookup-1.99.95-1....
Notes: - Since the upstream no longer supports XEmacs (see NEWS), I packaged it for GNU Emacs only. - The spec file is based on the template on the Emacs packaging policy so it should not contain issues mentioned above. - I concluded the license is GPLv3+ since the package contains both GPLv2+ and GPLv3+ files.
If it is ok, I'm available for maintaining the package.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446814
--- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-04-06 03:25:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6)
If it is ok, I'm available for maintaining the package.
If you want to import this package into Fedora, please file a new review request and mark this ticket as a duplicate of the new one.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446814
Daiki Ueno dueno@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #8 from Daiki Ueno dueno@redhat.com 2010-04-06 03:40:43 EDT --- Done, thanks.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 579662 ***
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org