https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120450
Bug ID: 2120450 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-twpayne-vfs-3 - v3 import path of twpayne-vfs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: hello@anthonyrabbito.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/anthr76/golang-to-fedora/... SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/anthr76/golang-to-fedora/... Description: Package vfs provides an abstraction of the os and io packages that is easy to test. Fedora Account System Username: anthr76/@GoSig
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120450
Anthony Rabbito hello@anthonyrabbito.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value CC| |hello@anthonyrabbito.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120450
--- Comment #1 from Anthony Rabbito hello@anthonyrabbito.com --- Updated spec to use `gometa -f`
Spec URL: https://anthr76.fedorapeople.org/golang-github-twpayne-vfs-3/golang-github-t... SRPM URL: https://anthr76.fedorapeople.org/golang-github-twpayne-vfs-3/golang-github-t...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120450
Anthony Rabbito hello@anthonyrabbito.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2130734
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130734 [Bug 2130734] Review Request: Chezmoi - Manage your dotfiles across multiple diverse machines, securely.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120450
Anthony Rabbito hello@anthonyrabbito.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2130734 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130734 [Bug 2130734] Review Request: Chezmoi - Manage your dotfiles across multiple diverse machines, securely.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120450
Anthony Rabbito hello@anthonyrabbito.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2120454
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120454 [Bug 2120454] Review Request: golang-github-twpayne-xdg-6 - v6 import path of twpayne/xdg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120450
Mikel Olasagasti Uranga mikel@olasagasti.info changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |mikel@olasagasti.info Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mikel@olasagasti.info
--- Comment #2 from Mikel Olasagasti Uranga mikel@olasagasti.info --- Spec is correct, but I've one doubt.
Diff between v3 and v4 has not any relevant change over previous version:
https://github.com/twpayne/go-vfs/compare/v3.0.0...v4.1.0
I've checked if xdg-v6 package could work with go-vfs-v4 and, as expected, works fine.
https://github.com/twpayne/go-xdg/pull/7
I see three options:
a) Package go-vfs-v3 as-is in this BZ b) Package go-vfs-v4 and patch xdg-v6 to switch (sed or patch) from go-vfs-v3 to go-vfs-v4 c) Package go-vfs non versioned, and modify xdg-v6 spec to replace dependency of go-vfs
I would go with option b, so in case any other package depends on it can use the latest version, but as you prefer.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120450
Mikel Olasagasti Uranga mikel@olasagasti.info changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Environment| |If this bug requires | |documentation, please | |select an appropriate Doc | |Type value.
--- Comment #3 from Mikel Olasagasti Uranga mikel@olasagasti.info --- Now I see that chezmoi itself depends on go-vfs-v4 and that a review is pending for it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2120452
Based on this, please, go with option b, close this BZ and we go with BZ2120452.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120450
Anthony Rabbito hello@anthonyrabbito.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Last Closed| |2022-10-05 23:18:07
--- Comment #4 from Anthony Rabbito hello@anthonyrabbito.com --- Sure Mikel. We will go with option B
Thank you very much for the upstream patch. Cheers!
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org