[Bug 751917] New: Review Request: ghc-zlib-enum - Enumerator interface for zlib compression
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-zlib-enum - Enumerator interface for zlib compression
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751917
Summary: Review Request: ghc-zlib-enum - Enumerator interface for zlib compression Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: petersen@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: ---
Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-zlib-enum/ghc-zlib-enum.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-zlib-enum/ghc-zlib-enum-0.2.1-1... Description: This library provides Haskell enumeratees for zlib compression/decompression.
It is needed by both snap-core >= 0.5.5 and http-enumerator. http://packdeps.haskellers.com/reverse/zlib-enum
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751917
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list@redhat. | |com Blocks| |736577(ghc-snap-core), | |648099(ghc-http-enumerator) Status Whiteboard| |Ready
--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2011-11-07 22:16:09 EST --- Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3496255
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751917
Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2002@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lakshminaras2002@gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2002@gmail.com 2011-11-19 07:48:48 EST --- [+]MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.
rpmlint -i ghc-zlib-enum-0.2.1-1.fc15.src.rpm ghc-zlib-enum-0.2.1-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm ghc-zlib-enum-devel-0.2.1-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm ../ghc-zlib-enum.spec ghc-zlib-enum.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US enumeratees -> enumerates, enumerate es, enumerate-es The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-zlib-enum.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US enumeratees -> enumerates, enumerate es, enumerate-es The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-zlib-enum-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US enumeratees -> enumerates, enumerate es, enumerate-es The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
[+]MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+]MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec [+]MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. Naming-Yes Version-release - Matches No prebuilt external bits - OK Spec legibity - OK Package template - OK Arch support - OK Libexecdir - OK rpmlint - yes changelogs - OK Source url tag - OK, validated. Build Requires list - OK Summary and description - OK API documentation - OK, in devel package
[+]MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. Licensed as MIT. [+]MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+]MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. LICENSE file is included. [+]MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+]MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+]MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task.
md5sum ghc-zlib-enum-0.2.1-1.fc15.src/zlib-enum-0.2.1.tar.gz 406527a84da5b22bf1cf5e9ad3eac43a ghc-zlib-enum-0.2.1-1.fc15.src/zlib-enum-0.2.1.tar.gz
md5sum ~/Downloads/zlib-enum-0.2.1.tar.gz 406527a84da5b22bf1cf5e9ad3eac43a ~/Downloads/zlib-enum-0.2.1.tar.gz
[+]MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Built on x86_64 [+]MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+]MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. [+]MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. Checked with rpmquery --list [NA]MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review. [+]MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. Checked with rpmquery --whatprovides [+]MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+]MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Checked with ls -lR [+]MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+]MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. [+]MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. [+]MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [NA]MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [NA]MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [+]MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: {name} = %{version}-%{release}
rpm -e ghc-zlib-enum error: Failed dependencies: ghc(zlib-enum-0.2.1) = 7198d5f0bd159725d9eb7a79395aec6e is needed by (installed) ghc-zlib-enum-devel-0.2.1-1.fc15.x86_64 ghc-zlib-enum = 0.2.1-1.fc15 is needed by (installed) ghc-zlib-enum-devel-0.2.1-1.fc15.x86_64
[NA]MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [NA]MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section [+]MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. Checked with rpmquery --whatprovides and rpmquery --list [+]MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
Should items [+]SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [+]SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. Installed the packages. Loaded Codec.Zlib.Enum into ghci. Loads fine [+]SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
cabal2spec-diff is OK.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751917
--- Comment #3 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2002@gmail.com 2011-11-19 13:02:37 EST --- APPROVED.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751917
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |lakshminaras2002@gmail.com Status Whiteboard|Ready |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751917
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2011-11-20 22:58:17 EST --- Thank you for reviewing! :)
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-zlib-enum Short Description: Enumerator interface for zlib compression Owners: petersen Branches: f16 f15 el6 InitialCC: haskell-sig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751917
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net 2011-11-21 08:33:32 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751917
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |ghc-zlib-enum
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751917
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751917
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-21 20:32:50 EST --- ghc-zlib-enum-0.2.1-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-zlib-enum-0.2.1-1.fc15
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751917
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-21 20:32:58 EST --- ghc-zlib-enum-0.2.1-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-zlib-enum-0.2.1-1.fc16
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751917
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-22 19:55:08 EST --- ghc-zlib-enum-0.2.1-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751917
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |ghc-zlib-enum-0.2.1-1.fc15 Resolution| |ERRATA Last Closed| |2011-12-03 21:39:30
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 21:39:30 EST --- ghc-zlib-enum-0.2.1-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751917
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|ghc-zlib-enum-0.2.1-1.fc15 |ghc-zlib-enum-0.2.1-1.fc16
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-03 21:46:37 EST --- ghc-zlib-enum-0.2.1-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Red Hat Bugzilla