https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868292
Bug ID: 868292 QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: notting@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: mate-power-manager - MATE power management service Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: leigh123linux@googlemail.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora
Spec URL: http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/mate-power-manager/1/mate-p...
SRPM URL: http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/mate-power-manager/1/mate-p...
Description: MATE Power Manager uses the information and facilities provided by UPower displaying icons and handling user callbacks in an interactive MATE session.
Fedora Account System Username: leigh123linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868292
Rex Dieter rdieter@math.unl.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |rdieter@math.unl.edu Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |rdieter@math.unl.edu Alias| |mate-power-manager Flags| |fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868292
Rex Dieter rdieter@math.unl.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chat-to-me@raveit.de
--- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter rdieter@math.unl.edu --- *** Bug 845697 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868292
Rex Dieter rdieter@math.unl.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |840149 (MATE-DE-tracker)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868292
--- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter rdieter@math.unl.edu --- initial comments:
1. SHOULD do verbose build, please use V=1 flag, make %{?_smp_mflags} V=1
2. Why Requires: mate-icon-theme ? (it's already pulled in lower in the stack by mate-settings-daemon and mate-file-manager, so may or may not really be wanted here anyway)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868292
--- Comment #3 from leigh scott leigh123linux@googlemail.com --- Ok I have addressed those issues
Spec URL: http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/mate-power-manager/2/mate-p...
SRPM URL: http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/mate-power-manager/2/mate-p...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868292
Rex Dieter rdieter@math.unl.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? | Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter rdieter@math.unl.edu --- Thanks, APPROVED.
(the rpmlint items are mostly harmless, imo)
Package Review ==============
Key: [x] = Pass [!] = Fail [-] = Not applicable [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====
C/C++: [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [ ]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic: [ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries. [ ]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 [ ]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install if there is such a file. [ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package [ ]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ ]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags. [ ]: Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "GPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 3 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/rdieter1/pkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/mate/review- mate-power-manager/licensecheck.txt [ ]: The spec file handles locales properly. [ ]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [ ]: Package does not generate any conflict. Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s) [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [ ]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package installs properly. [ ]: Package is not relocatable. [ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: CheckResultdir [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [ ]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic: [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q --requires). [ ]: Package functions as described. [ ]: Latest version is packaged. [ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [ ]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. [x]: SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [ ]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [ ]: %check is present and all tests pass. [ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint ------- Checking: mate-power-manager-1.4.0-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm mate-power-manager-debuginfo-1.4.0-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm mate-power-manager-1.4.0-1.fc18.src.rpm mate-power-manager.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib mate-power-manager.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/mateconf/schemas/mate-power-manager.schemas mate-power-manager.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/mate-power-manager.desktop mate-power-manager.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/mate-power-manager-1.4.0/COPYING mate-power-manager.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mate-power-bugreport.sh mate-power-manager.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mate-power-backlight-helper mate-power-manager.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%pre rm mate-power-manager.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm mate-power-manager-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/mate-power-manager-1.4.0/src/gsd-media-keys-window.h 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 7 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint mate-power-manager mate-power-manager-debuginfo mate-power-manager.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib mate-power-manager.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/mateconf/schemas/mate-power-manager.schemas mate-power-manager.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/mate-power-manager.desktop mate-power-manager.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/mate-power-manager-1.4.0/COPYING mate-power-manager.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mate-power-bugreport.sh mate-power-manager.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mate-power-backlight-helper mate-power-manager.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%pre rm mate-power-manager.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm mate-power-manager-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/mate-power-manager-1.4.0/src/gsd-media-keys-window.h 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 7 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:'
Requires -------- mate-power-manager-1.4.0-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
/bin/sh dbus-x11 libMateCORBA-2.so.0()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit) libXext.so.6()(64bit) libXrandr.so.2()(64bit) libXrender.so.1()(64bit) libart_lgpl_2.so.2()(64bit) libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libcanberra-gtk.so.0()(64bit) libcanberra.so.0()(64bit) libdbus-1.so.3()(64bit) libdbus-glib-1.so.2()(64bit) libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit) libfreetype.so.6()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libmate-2.so.0()(64bit) libmate-keyring.so.1()(64bit) libmate-panel-applet-2.so.1()(64bit) libmatecanvas-2.so.0()(64bit) libmatecomponent-2.so.0()(64bit) libmatecomponent-activation.so.4()(64bit) libmatecomponentui-2.so.0()(64bit) libmateconf-2.so.4()(64bit) libmatenotify.so.1()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangoft2-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpopt.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libunique-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libupower-glib.so.1()(64bit) mate-icon-theme rtld(GNU_HASH)
mate-power-manager-debuginfo-1.4.0-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
Provides -------- mate-power-manager-1.4.0-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm:
mate-power-manager = 1.4.0-1.fc18 mate-power-manager(x86-64) = 1.4.0-1.fc18
mate-power-manager-debuginfo-1.4.0-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm:
mate-power-manager-debuginfo = 1.4.0-1.fc18 mate-power-manager-debuginfo(x86-64) = 1.4.0-1.fc18
MD5-sum check ------------- http://pub.mate-desktop.org/releases/1.4/mate-power-manager-1.4.0.tar.xz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 84943d4ab97c400af428a1dba90898e068114ff7a6a62d8d546a98279cd554a9 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 84943d4ab97c400af428a1dba90898e068114ff7a6a62d8d546a98279cd554a9
Generated by fedora-review 0.3.1 (b71abc1) last change: 2012-10-16 Buildroot used: fedora-18-x86_64 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -n mate-power-manager --cache --verbose
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868292
leigh scott leigh123linux@googlemail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review+ | Flags| |fedora-review? Flags| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from leigh scott leigh123linux@googlemail.com --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: mate-power-manager Short Description: MATE power management service Owners: leigh123linux rdieter vicodan Branches: f16 f17 f18 InitialCC::
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868292
Rex Dieter rdieter@math.unl.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? | Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter rdieter@math.unl.edu --- no need to reset the review flag. :)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868292
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868292
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868292
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- mate-power-manager-1.4.0-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-16609/mate-power-manager...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868292
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- mate-power-manager-1.4.0-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-16561/mate-power-manager...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868292
Dan Mashal dan.mashal@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED CC| |dan.mashal@gmail.com Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2012-10-30 04:58:47
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Red Hat Bugzilla