[Bug 1548405] New: Review Request: python-gsd - Read and write hoomd schema gsd files with an easy to use syntax

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548405

Bug ID: 1548405
           Summary: Review Request: python-gsd - Read and write hoomd
                    schema gsd files with an easy to use syntax
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
         Component: Package Review
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
          Assignee: [e-mail]
          Reporter: [e-mail]
        QA Contact: [e-mail]
                CC: [e-mail]

Spec URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/python-gsd/python-gsd.spec
SRPM URL:
https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/python-gsd/python-gsd-1.5.0-1.fc27.s...
Description:
GSD (General Simulation Data) is a file format specification and a library
to read and write it. The package also contains a python module that reads
and writes hoomd schema gsd files with an easy to use syntax.

* Efficiently store many frames of data from simulation runs.
* High performance file read and write.
* Support arbitrary chunks of data in each frame (position, orientation,
  type, etc...).
* Append frames to an existing file with a monotonically increasing frame
  number.
* Resilient to job kills.
* Variable number of named chunks in each frame.
* Variable size of chunks in each frame.
* Each chunk identifies data type.
* Common use cases: NxM arrays in double, float, int, char types.
* Generic use case: binary blob of N bytes.
* Easy to integrate into other tools with python, or a C API (< 1k lines).
* Fast random access to frames.

Fedora Account System Username: rathann

[Bug 1548405] Review Request: python-gsd - Read and write hoomd schema gsd files with an easy to use syntax

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548405

Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |1538855

Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538855
[Bug 1538855] python-MDAnalysis-0.17.0 is available

[Bug 1548405] Review Request: python-gsd - Read and write hoomd schema gsd files with an easy to use syntax

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548405

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |POST
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]
           Assignee|[e-mail]    |[e-mail]
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+

--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Package approved.

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed

===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
     Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
     attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "BSD (2 clause)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* BSD
     (unspecified)". 50 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
     licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/python-gsd/review-python-
     gsd/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
     process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
     python2-gsd , python3-gsd
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.

Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python2-gsd-1.5.0-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm
          python3-gsd-1.5.0-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm
          python-gsd-debuginfo-1.5.0-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm
          python-gsd-debugsource-1.5.0-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm
          python-gsd-1.5.0-1.fc29.src.rpm
python2-gsd.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) hoomd -> hood
python2-gsd.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hoomd -> hood
python2-gsd.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US NxM -> NM, Nam,
Minx
python3-gsd.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) hoomd -> hood
python3-gsd.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hoomd -> hood
python3-gsd.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US NxM -> NM, Nam,
Minx
python-gsd-debugsource.x86_64: W: no-documentation
python-gsd.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) hoomd -> hood
python-gsd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hoomd -> hood
python-gsd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US NxM -> NM, Nam, Minx
python-gsd.src:79: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build
PYTHONPATH=%{buildroot}%{python3_sitearch}:%{buildroot}%{python3_sitelib}:$PWD
\
python-gsd.src:91: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
python-gsd.src:91: W: macro-in-comment %{python2_sitearch}
python-gsd.src:91: W: macro-in-comment %{python2_version}
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 14 warnings.

[Bug 1548405] Review Request: python-gsd - Read and write hoomd schema gsd files with an easy to use syntax

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548405

--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-gsd

[Bug 1548405] Review Request: python-gsd - Read and write hoomd schema gsd files with an easy to use syntax

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548405

Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|POST                        |CLOSED
         Resolution|---                         |RAWHIDE
        Last Closed|                            |2018-03-08 08:57:41

--- Comment #3 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski  ---
Imported and build for rawhide for now. Thanks a lot for the review!