Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ruby-build - simple way to compile and install different versions of Ruby on UNIX-like systems.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735672
Summary: Review Request: ruby-build - simple way to compile and install different versions of Ruby on UNIX-like systems. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tejasdinkar@gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: ---
Spec URL: http://tejas.fedorapeople.org/ruby-build/ruby-build.spec SRPM URL: <srpm info here> Description: ruby-build provides a simple way to compile and install different versions of Ruby on UNIX-like systems.
I'm currenly asking the maintainer of ruby-build to tag releases of ruby-build. Currently, the version number was set by me. I wanted a bit of feedback on the steps in the %install, specifically, if this line is allowed:
PREFIX=%{buildroot}%{_prefix} ./install.sh
(as this calls install.sh in the tarball).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735672
--- Comment #1 from Tejas Dinkar tejasdinkar@gmail.com 2011-09-07 14:51:10 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://tejas.fedorapeople.org/ruby-build/ruby-build-20110906.1-2.fc15.src.rp... I checked with mether about the style of using install.sh, and he felt it was acceptable.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735672
Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(tejasdinkar@gmail | |.com)
--- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu --- I am triaging old review tickets. I apologize that it has been so long since anyone looked at this ticket, but there are more packages submitted now than the pool of reviewers can handle, and some tickets fall through the cracks.
In order to keep the queue manageable, we need to occasionally find tickets which are not reviewable so as to not waste what reviewer time is available. Accordingly, I'm pinging this ticket and setting NEEDINFO. If you are still interested in having your package reviewed, please do the following:
* Make sure your package still reflects the current status of its upstream.
* Check that your package still builds on current Fedora releases.
* Audit your package versus the current status of the packaging guidelines, current rpmlint and current fedora-review tools.
And, finally, reply, making sure that the NEEDINFO flag gets cleared so that this ticket reappears in the review queue. I can't promise a review if you reply, but by closing out the stale tickets we can devote extra attention to the ones which aren't stale.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735672
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitoring@fedoraproject.org --- jgrulich's scratch build of kdevelop?#c8e2b9bc57f11e41f3dc6612cdbcc591078d9062 for f22-candidate and git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/kdevelop?#c8e2b9bc57f11e41f3dc6612cdbcc591078d9062 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11212117
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735672
James Hogarth james.hogarth@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |james.hogarth@gmail.com Blocks| |201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Flags|needinfo?(tejasdinkar@gmail | |.com) | Last Closed| |2015-12-03 22:02:59
--- Comment #4 from James Hogarth james.hogarth@gmail.com --- There had been no response from the requester to a needs info flag in over a year.
Closing this bug as per policy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org