Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423
Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah@yahoo.com.au QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com
Spec URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/libstroke.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/libstroke-0.5.1-6.src.rpm Description: LibStroke is a stroke interface library. Strokes are motions of the mouse that can be interpreted by a program as a command.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423
mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423
cgoorah@yahoo.com.au changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |204598 nThis| |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-30 12:54 EST ------- First review for libstroke:
1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines :
* Licensing + This package says it is distributed under GPL, however, this does not include the copy of GPL license. I won't block this package by this issue, however, it is recommended that you ask for upstream to include GPL documents to this package.
* Requires - %package -n libgstroke-devel Conflicts: libstroke-devel
What does this mean? Is there any way to remove this conflict sentence?
* BuildRequirs - texinfo Is this really required? It seems that makeinfo is not used in rebuilding. - libX11-devel <- required by gtk+-devel
* File and Directory Ownership %{_datadir}/libstroke %{_datadir}/libstroke/java %{_datadir}/libstroke/test --- not owned by any packages.
2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines
= Nothing.
3. Other things I have noticed
= Nothing.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423
------- Additional Comments From cgoorah@yahoo.com.au 2006-08-30 13:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1)
First review for libstroke:
From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines :
- Licensing
- This package says it is distributed under GPL, however, this does not include the copy of GPL license. I won't block this package by this issue, however, it is recommended that you ask for upstream to include GPL documents to this package.
I've contacted upstream.
Requires
%package -n libgstroke-devel Conflicts: libstroke-devel
What does this mean? Is there any way to remove this conflict sentence?
I don't see how.
Updatedb: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/libstroke.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/libstroke-0.5.1-7.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-30 14:26 EST ------- Well:
* I just want to know why libgstroke-devel conflicts with libstroke-devel .
* %{_datadir}/stroke/ (in main package) Well, no. When writing as this, this (main) package includes the directory %{_datadir}/stroke/ and all files under this directory. If you want to include only the directory, explicit declaration of %dir is needed.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423
------- Additional Comments From cgoorah@yahoo.com.au 2006-08-30 14:49 EST ------- There are suprisingly not much difference, only libgstroke-devel is the gnome bindings of libstroke-devel.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423
------- Additional Comments From cgoorah@yahoo.com.au 2006-08-30 14:53 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/libstroke.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/libstroke-0.5.1-8.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423
------- Additional Comments From willey@etla.net 2006-08-30 14:58 EST -------
I'm not sure why there is a conflict -- is that some artifact of your packaging system? (Which I'm not familiar with.) I'll put COPYING in the next release. I haven't made a release for a long time, but I'll do so to resolve that and the conflict issue, if we can figure out exactly what's broken there and if there's something for me to fix on my release.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-30 15:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4)
There are suprisingly not much difference, only libgstroke-devel is the gnome bindings of libstroke-devel.
Umm.. I still cannot understand why these conflicts each other. ( as Mark says ) * File lists do not make duplicate. * When using libstroke-devel, it requires to write "include <stroke.h>" in source code and to use -lstroke. On the other hand when using libgstroke-devel they changes to "include <gstroke.h>" and -lgstroke . They never overwrite each other.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423
------- Additional Comments From cgoorah@yahoo.com.au 2006-08-30 15:26 EST ------- Ok, the "conflict" in the spec was written by the previous packager. I thought it was founded enough.
Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/libstroke.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/libstroke-0.5.1-9.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-30 15:32 EST ------- Well:
As was in main package %files -n %{name}-devel %{_datadir}/stroke/tests/ %{_datadir}/stroke/tests/stroke_test %{_datadir}/stroke/tests/stroke_test.tcl
%files -n javastroke %{_datadir}/stroke/java/ %{_datadir}/stroke/java/*.java
These are duplicates. Please check file entries so that * all necessary files and directories are owned. * duplicate files are not listed.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423
------- Additional Comments From cgoorah@yahoo.com.au 2006-08-30 15:38 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/libstroke.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/libstroke-0.5.1-10.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-30 16:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10)
Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/libstroke.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/libstroke-0.5.1-10.src.rpm
Well, not yet okay.
rpm -qlp *0.5.1*rpm | sort says
/usr/share/stroke/tests /usr/share/stroke/tests/gnome_stroke_test /usr/share/stroke/tests/gnome_stroke_test /usr/share/stroke/tests/stroke_test /usr/share/stroke/tests/stroke_test.tcl /usr/src/debug/libstroke-0.5.1
... /usr/share/stroke/tests/gnome_stroke_test is owned by libstroke-devel and libgstroke-devel
and... from this package: there is a case that only libgstroke and libgstroke-devel and libstroke are installed:
in that case the directory %{_datadir}/stroke/tests/ is not owned by any packages. This is not correct.
So: %files -n %{name} %defattr(-,root,root) %doc README COPYRIGHT ChangeLog NEWS AUTHORS TODO CREDITS %dir %{_datadir}/stroke/ %dir %{_datadir}/stroke/tests/ %{_libdir}/libstroke.so.*
%files -n %{name}-devel %defattr(-,root,root) %doc doc/standard_strokes* %{_datadir}/stroke/tests/stroke_test* %{_datadir}/aclocal/libstroke.m4 %{_libdir}/libstroke.so %{_includedir}/stroke.h
%files -n libgstroke %defattr(-,root,root) %doc README COPYRIGHT ChangeLog NEWS AUTHORS TODO CREDITS %{_libdir}/libgstroke.so.*
%files -n libgstroke-devel %defattr(-,root,root) %doc README.libgstroke %{_datadir}/stroke/tests/gnome_stroke_test %{_datadir}/aclocal/libgstroke.m4 %{_libdir}/libgstroke.so %{_includedir}/gstroke.h
%files -n javastroke %defattr(-,root,root) %doc javastroke/README %{_datadir}/stroke/java/
is correct (I think. check it).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423
------- Additional Comments From cgoorah@yahoo.com.au 2006-08-31 19:07 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/libstroke.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/libstroke-0.5.1-11.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423
mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-31 22:50 EST ------- Well, now the files/directories ownership consistency is okay.
I checked my mock build and it turned out that automake is unnecessary for BuildRequires as automake and so on is not called in rebuilding and I suceeded in rebuilding this with automake removed from BR.
Please remove automake from BuildRequires, which is the only things to be fixed.
This package is APPROVED by me.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423
cgoorah@yahoo.com.au changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204423
Chitlesh GOORAH cgoorah@yahoo.com.au changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #14 from Chitlesh GOORAH cgoorah@yahoo.com.au 2008-12-21 14:33:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libstroke Short Description: A stroke interface library Owners: chitlesh Branches: EL-5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204423
Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2008-12-22 22:19:58 EDT --- cvs done.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org