[Bug 1620366] New: Review Request: ocrmypdf - OCRmyPDF adds an OCR text layer to scanned PDF files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1620366
Bug ID: 1620366 Summary: Review Request: ocrmypdf - OCRmyPDF adds an OCR text layer to scanned PDF files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: quantum.analyst@gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ocrmypdf.spec SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ocrmypdf-7.0.3-1.fc28.src.rpm
Description: OCRmyPDF adds an OCR text layer to scanned PDF files, allowing them to be searched or copy-pasted.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1620366
--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade quantum.analyst@gmail.com --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=29240800
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1620366
Robert-André Mauchin zebob.m@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zebob.m@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin zebob.m@gmail.com --- - Remove the shebang from these scripts:
ocrmypdf.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/ocrmypdf/__main__.py /usr/bin/env python3 ocrmypdf.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/ocrmypdf/__main__.py 644 /usr/bin/env python3 ocrmypdf.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/ocrmypdf/hocrtransform.py /usr/bin/env python3 ocrmypdf.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/ocrmypdf/hocrtransform.py 644 /usr/bin/env python3 ocrmypdf.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/ocrmypdf/leptonica.py /usr/bin/env python3 ocrmypdf.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/ocrmypdf/leptonica.py 644 /usr/bin/env python3 ocrmypdf.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/ocrmypdf/lib/compile_leptonica.py /usr/bin/env python3 ocrmypdf.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/ocrmypdf/lib/compile_leptonica.py 644 /usr/bin/env python3 ocrmypdf.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/ocrmypdf/pdfinfo.py /usr/bin/env python3 ocrmypdf.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/ocrmypdf/pdfinfo.py 644 /usr/bin/env python3
- Don't repeat the name of the package in the summary
Package Review ==============
Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====
Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "BSD (3 clause)", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "*No copyright* GPL (v3 or later)", "GPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 204 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/ocrmypdf/review-ocrmypdf/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. Note: Package contains Conflicts: tag(s) needing fix or justification. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic: [-]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages. Note: Package contains font files [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in ocrmypdf-doc [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint ------- Checking: ocrmypdf-7.0.3-1.fc30.noarch.rpm ocrmypdf-doc-7.0.3-1.fc30.noarch.rpm ocrmypdf-7.0.3-1.fc30.src.rpm ocrmypdf.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary C OCRmyPDF ocrmypdf.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/jbarlow83/OCRmyPDF <urlopen error timed out> ocrmypdf.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/ocrmypdf/__main__.py /usr/bin/env python3 ocrmypdf.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/ocrmypdf/__main__.py 644 /usr/bin/env python3 ocrmypdf.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/ocrmypdf/hocrtransform.py /usr/bin/env python3 ocrmypdf.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/ocrmypdf/hocrtransform.py 644 /usr/bin/env python3 ocrmypdf.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/ocrmypdf/leptonica.py /usr/bin/env python3 ocrmypdf.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/ocrmypdf/leptonica.py 644 /usr/bin/env python3 ocrmypdf.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/ocrmypdf/lib/compile_leptonica.py /usr/bin/env python3 ocrmypdf.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/ocrmypdf/lib/compile_leptonica.py 644 /usr/bin/env python3 ocrmypdf.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/ocrmypdf/pdfinfo.py /usr/bin/env python3 ocrmypdf.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/ocrmypdf/pdfinfo.py 644 /usr/bin/env python3 ocrmypdf.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ocrmypdf ocrmypdf-doc.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C ocrmypdf documentation ocrmypdf.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C OCRmyPDF 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 10 errors, 5 warnings.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1620366
--- Comment #3 from Elliott Sales de Andrade quantum.analyst@gmail.com --- Should be fixed now.
Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org/ocrmypdf.spec SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org/ocrmypdf-7.0.3-2.fc28.src.rpm build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=29256540
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1620366
Robert-André Mauchin zebob.m@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |POST Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |zebob.m@gmail.com Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin zebob.m@gmail.com --- Package approved.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1620366
--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocrmypdf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1620366
Elliott Sales de Andrade quantum.analyst@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|POST |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |ocrmypdf-7.0.3-2.fc30 | |ocrmypdf-7.0.3-2.fc29 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed| |2018-08-24 23:31:42
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
bugzilla＠redhat.com