https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200885
Bug ID: 1200885 Summary: Review Request: airline - Java annotation-based framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: puntogil@libero.it QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/airline.spec SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/airline-0.7-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Airline is a Java annotation-based framework for parsing Git like command line structures. Fedora Account System Username: gil
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9204748
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200885
gil cattaneo puntogil@libero.it changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1200902
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200902 [Bug 1200902] enable okcurl module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200885
Gerard Ryan gerard@ryan.lt changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |gerard@ryan.lt Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |gerard@ryan.lt Flags| |fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200885
Gerard Ryan gerard@ryan.lt changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Gerard Ryan gerard@ryan.lt --- Approved. Please enable tests as detailed below before importing. Thanks for packaging! :)
Package Review ==============
Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed
Issues: ======= [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. Tests are currently disabled with a note about missing settings from parent POM, which is not packaged. I've managed to get them to work by adding the following to %prep, so please enable them before importing:
%pom_xpath_inject "pom:dependency[pom:artifactId='testng']" '<version>4.7</version>'
^The problem is that there's no version set, so maven sees the version as SYSTEM, and that fails a check for version 4.7+. Since we ignore the version most of the time anyway, we can set it to anything from 4.7 or later to get this to work (Rawhide has 6.8.21).
There are other settings in the parent POM for surefire plugin, but they don't seem to matter too much, all tests passed for me in mock.
===== MUST items =====
Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated". 37 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/grdryn/1200885-airline/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. Note: Test run failed [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Test run failed [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Note: Test run failed [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
Java: [x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build Note: Test run failed [x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils Note: Maven packages do not need to (Build)Require jpackage-utils. It is pulled in by maven-local [x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc subpackage [x]: Javadoc subpackages should not have Requires: jpackage-utils [x]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink)
Maven: [x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when building with ant [x]: POM files have correct Maven mapping [x]: Maven packages should use new style packaging [x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used [x]: Packages DO NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage- utils for %update_maven_depmap macro [x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun [x]: Packages use .mfiles file list instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in airline- javadoc [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
Java: [x]: Package uses upstream build method (ant/maven/etc.) [x]: Packages are noarch unless they use JNI
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic: [-]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Note: Test run failed [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint ------- Checking: airline-0.7-1.fc23.noarch.rpm airline-javadoc-0.7-1.fc23.noarch.rpm airline-0.7-1.fc23.src.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- Cannot parse rpmlint output:
Requires -------- airline-javadoc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): jpackage-utils
airline (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): java-headless jpackage-utils mvn(com.google.code.findbugs:annotations) mvn(com.google.code.findbugs:jsr305) mvn(com.google.guava:guava) mvn(javax.inject:javax.inject)
Provides -------- airline-javadoc: airline-javadoc
airline: airline mvn(io.airlift:airline) mvn(io.airlift:airline:pom:)
Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/airlift/airline/archive/0.7.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : ec4b4fde23c91707aaa4487f0a091accdc1181e0795042d44e379f8b553bc063 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : ec4b4fde23c91707aaa4487f0a091accdc1181e0795042d44e379f8b553bc063
Generated by fedora-review 0.5.2 (63c24cb) last change: 2014-07-14 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1200885 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, Java Disabled plugins: C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200885
gil cattaneo puntogil@libero.it changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo puntogil@libero.it --- (In reply to Gerard Ryan from comment #1)
Approved. Please enable tests as detailed below before importing. Thanks for packaging! :)
Issues:
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass. Tests are currently disabled with a note about missing settings from parent POM, which is not packaged. I've managed to get them to work by adding the following to %prep, so please enable them before importing:
%pom_xpath_inject "pom:dependency[pom:artifactId='testng']" '<version>4.7</version>'
Done
^The problem is that there's no version set, so maven sees the version as SYSTEM, and that fails a check for version 4.7+. Since we ignore the version most of the time anyway, we can set it to anything from 4.7 or later to get this to work (Rawhide has 6.8.21).
Inserted 6.8.7 (use guava 18.0)
There are other settings in the parent POM for surefire plugin, but they don't seem to matter too much, all tests passed for me in mock.
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9292637
Thanks!
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/airline.spec SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/airline-0.7-1.fc20.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200885
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo puntogil@libero.it --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: airline Short Description: Java annotation-based framework Upstream URL: https://github.com/airlift/airline Owners: gil Branches: f22 InitialCC: java-sig
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200885
Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200885
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|POST |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200885
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- airline-0.7-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/airline-0.7-1.fc22
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200885
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- airline-0.7-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200885
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |airline-0.7-1.fc22 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2015-03-31 17:54:49
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- airline-0.7-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Red Hat Bugzilla