Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225718
Summary: Merge Review: eel2 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nobody@fedoraproject.org QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com CC: alexl@redhat.com
Fedora Merge Review: eel2
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/eel2/ Initial Owner: alexl@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: eel2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225718
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium
dakingun@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |dakingun@gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review?
------- Additional Comments From dakingun@gmail.com 2007-04-14 12:26 EST ------- GOOD: * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group and License tags properly in place * Locales handled correctly * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Package builds OK in Mock. * Source matches upstream md5sum: dd06a56773af79e4292e63c6bcca9449 eel-2.18.0.1.tar.bz2
NEEDSWORK: * Source url not given in the spec * eel2-devel should not own %{_libdir}/pkgconfig, the -devel %files section should have /usr/lib/pkgconfig/eel-2.0.pc instead * rpmlint warnings: $ rpmlint eel2-2.18.0.1-3.fc7.src.rpm W: eel2 mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 17, tab: line 16) $ rpmlint eel2-2.18.0.1-3.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: eel2 spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/eel2-2.18.0.1/COPYING $ rpmlint eel2-devel-2.18.0.1-3.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: eel2-devel no-documentation (can be ignored!)
Minor nit: $RPM_OPT_FLAGS already includes a '-g' option
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: eel2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225718
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium
------- Additional Comments From alexl@redhat.com 2007-04-23 08:41 EST ------- Fixed in -5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: eel2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225718
dakingun@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From dakingun@gmail.com 2007-05-07 00:54 EST ------- I'm sorry I almost forgot about this.
All issues in comment #1 are now fixed; rpmlint is now silent on the srpm and the binaries (except for the ignorable one), and all packaged files are properly owned.
APPROVED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: eel2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225718
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora
mclasen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE
------- Additional Comments From mclasen@redhat.com 2007-08-10 21:37 EST ------- Review done.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org