https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160771
Bug ID: 2160771 Summary: Review Request: flatseal - Manage Flatpak permissions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: yselkowi@redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/flatseal.spec SRPM URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/flatseal-1.8.1-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: Flatseal is a graphical utility to review and modify permissions from your Flatpak applications. Fedora Account System Username: yselkowitz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160771
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Kadlčík jkadlcik@redhat.com --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5227730 (succeeded)
Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-rev...
Please take a look if any issues were found.
--- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160771
Neal Gompa ngompa13@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review? Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |ngompa13@gmail.com CC| |ngompa13@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ngompa13@gmail.com --- Taking this review.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160771
Yaakov Selkowitz yselkowi@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(ngompa13@gmail.co | |m)
--- Comment #3 from Yaakov Selkowitz yselkowi@redhat.com --- Are you still planning on taking this review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160771
Neal Gompa ngompa13@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags|needinfo?(ngompa13@gmail.co | |m) |
--- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa ngompa13@gmail.com --- Initial spec review:
Source0: %{url}/archive/%{commit}/Flatseal-%{commit}.tar.gz
This has tags, so use those instead: "%{url}/archive/v%{version}/Flatseal-%{version}.tar.gz"
desktop-file-validate %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/%{app_id}.desktop
appstream-util validate-relax --nonet %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/appdata/%{app_id}.appdata.xml
These should go into %check for clarity.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160771
--- Comment #5 from Yaakov Selkowitz yselkowi@redhat.com --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #4)
Initial spec review:
Source0: %{url}/archive/%{commit}/Flatseal-%{commit}.tar.gz
This has tags, so use those instead: "%{url}/archive/v%{version}/Flatseal-%{version}.tar.gz"
The packaging guidelines say otherwise, since git tags are not immutable:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/#_git_ta...
desktop-file-validate %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/%{app_id}.desktop
appstream-util validate-relax --nonet %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/appdata/%{app_id}.appdata.xml
These should go into %check for clarity.
The guidelines allow either:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_desktop_file_ins...
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/AppData/#_app_data...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160771
--- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa ngompa13@gmail.com --- (In reply to Yaakov Selkowitz from comment #5)
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #4)
Initial spec review:
Source0: %{url}/archive/%{commit}/Flatseal-%{commit}.tar.gz
This has tags, so use those instead: "%{url}/archive/v%{version}/Flatseal-%{version}.tar.gz"
The packaging guidelines say otherwise, since git tags are not immutable:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/ #_git_tags
It definitely does not say that. It only mentions screwiness with how Bitbucket works.
desktop-file-validate %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/%{app_id}.desktop
appstream-util validate-relax --nonet %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/appdata/%{app_id}.appdata.xml
These should go into %check for clarity.
The guidelines allow either:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ #_desktop_file_install_usage
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/AppData/ #_app_data_validate_usage
I guess, though checks like this should be in %check...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160771
--- Comment #7 from Yaakov Selkowitz yselkowi@redhat.com --- Spec URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/flatseal.spec SRPM URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/flatseal-1.8.1-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: Flatseal is a graphical utility to review and modify permissions from your Flatpak applications. Fedora Account System Username: yselkowitz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160771
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Kadlčík jkadlcik@redhat.com --- Created attachment 1939881 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1939881&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 5227730 to 5283032
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160771
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Kadlčík jkadlcik@redhat.com --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5283032 (succeeded)
Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-rev...
Please take a look if any issues were found.
--- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160771
Neal Gompa ngompa13@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ Status|ASSIGNED |POST
--- Comment #10 from Neal Gompa ngompa13@gmail.com --- Review notes:
* Package naming follows packaging guidelines * Package builds and installs * Package has no serious rpmlint issues * Package licensing is handled correctly
PACKAGE APPROVED.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160771
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions fedora-admin-xmlrpc@fedoraproject.org --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/flatseal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160771
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|POST |MODIFIED
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2023-15905b1689 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-15905b1689
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160771
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-EPEL-2023-750a4a2151 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-750a4a2151
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160771
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2023-15905b1689 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-15905b1689 *` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-15905b1689
See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160771
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions fedora-admin-xmlrpc@fedoraproject.org --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/flatpaks/flatseal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160771
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-FLATPAK-2023-04f87ea1a5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37 Flatpaks. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-FLATPAK-2023-04f87ea1a5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160771
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-EPEL-2023-750a4a2151 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-750a4a2151
See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160771
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-FLATPAK-2023-04f87ea1a5 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 Flatpaks testing repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-FLATPAK-2023-04f87ea1a5
See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160771
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed| |2023-01-31 01:56:58
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2023-15905b1689 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160771
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-EPEL-2023-750a4a2151 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160771
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-FLATPAK-2023-04f87ea1a5 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 Flatpaks stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org