[Bug 442714] New: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. - package-review

[Bug 442714] New: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

[Bug 447738] New: Review Request:...

[Bug 747659] New: Reivew Request:...

Red Hat Bugzilla

Wednesday, 16 April 2008 Wed, 16 Apr '08

7:36 a.m.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: arbiter(a)binaryhelix.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,notting(a)redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/specs/libs/sat-solver.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/sat-solver-0.0.27-20080416svn.fc9.src.rpm Description: sat-solver is a Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Show replies by date

Red Hat Bugzilla

Wednesday, 16 April Wed, 16 Apr

7:36 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Tuesday, 20 May Tue, 20 May

1:22 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Wednesday, 21 May Wed, 21 May

3:56 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Thursday, 22 May Thu, 22 May

7:46 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Monday, 9 June Mon, 9 Jun

7:56 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Red Hat Bugzilla

7:58 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Red Hat Bugzilla

12:50 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Red Hat Bugzilla

1:53 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 jochen(a)herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |fedora-review?, needinfo? ------- Additional Comments From jochen(a)herr-schmitt.de 2008-06-09 14:53 EST ------- Good: + Local build works fine on x86_64 + Rpmlint on source package is quite + Consistent macro usage + package use a OSS license + Tar archive in the package matches with upstream (md5sum: 52bc1b0309812eead630f8dfe795c923) + Rpmlint is quite on sat-solver package + File permissions seems ok. + Package seems not to have files own by other packages. + Local install and uninstall works fine. + Package build fine in mock (xu6_64, ppc64 and ppc, devel) Bad: - %{_includedir]/satsolver should be own by the package - Package should not contains static libraries - Package doesn't contains license text, but upstream package contains a verbatin copy of the license. - Rpmlint complaints on devel package: $ rpmlint sat-solver-devel-0.9.0-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm sat-solver-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation - Package seems not to use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS Questions: ? Why you remove the testsuite. From my point of view this may be helpful to ensure the QA of the package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Red Hat Bugzilla

3:23 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 lvillani(a)binaryhelix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From lvillani(a)binaryhelix.net 2008-06-09 16:23 EST ------- Before uploading a new version of the package I need something to be explained: Bad things: - %{_includedir}/satsolver: As far as I know, %{_includedir}/satsolver/* gives ownership to directory-contained files - static libraries: as far as i know, upstream build system (based on cmake) only produces static library archives and not shared objects and it seems that other packages depending on this library statically link the library in their final executable - verbatim copy of the license: I included that in both packages using %doc - rpmlint warning with sat-solver-devel: the inclusion of the verbatim copy of the license should fix this - $RPM_OPT_FLAGS: This is due to usage of cmake, afaik, using -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=FEDORA is sufficient, I added that to the cmake line And now the questions: I removed the *huge* testsuite (nearly 50MiB of stuff -compressed-) just to save bandwidth (yes, I'm lazy), If needed I can keep the testsuite inside the tarball but this will make the review process much slower because i'll have to upload ~100MiB of compressed tarballs (~50MiB of .src.rpm and ~50MiB of packaged snapshot). Side notes: As far as I know both sat-solver, libzypp and zypper can be retrieved only from upstream' subversion (or by 'extracting' source tarball from SuSE' .src.rpm) so the source archive is just a local subversion checkout with SCM directories stripped out (ie: tar'ed using --exclude-vcs) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Tuesday, 17 June Tue, 17 Jun

5:12 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Red Hat Bugzilla

5:50 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Red Hat Bugzilla

5:58 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Wednesday, 18 June Wed, 18 Jun

3:33 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Red Hat Bugzilla

4:38 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Thursday, 19 June Thu, 19 Jun

8:19 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Red Hat Bugzilla

8:26 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Red Hat Bugzilla

1:50 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Sunday, 22 June Sun, 22 Jun

3:01 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Tuesday, 24 June Tue, 24 Jun

5:33 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Red Hat Bugzilla

9:24 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Saturday, 5 July Sat, 5 Jul

4:47 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Red Hat Bugzilla

8:31 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

...

Upstream says that they're doing such way because of the still unstable API. Since they're stabilising the API they say that they will be providing shared libraries in the near future.

If you must use static libs, then at least follow the guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libr... Add Provides for sat-solver-static and add Buildrequires: sat-solver-static to libzypp/zypper packages. When package is included open a bug against the package regarding the static libs issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Red Hat Bugzilla

9 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Monday, 28 July Mon, 28 Jul

11:43 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Thursday, 7 August Thu, 7 Aug

5:28 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Red Hat Bugzilla

9:44 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #22 from Lorenzo Villani <lvillani(a)binaryhelix.net> 2008-08-07 10:44:38 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://omploader.org/vbm95/sat-solver.spec SRPM URL: http://omploader.org/vbm96/sat-solver-0.9.4-2.fc9.src.rpm * Thu Aug 7 2008 Lorenzo Villani <lvillani(a)binaryhelix.net> - 0.9.4-2 - Removed link to source tarball, it is not needed. Upstream distributes sat-solver, libzypp and zypper using a branched subversion tree, the tarball which comes with the SRPM is just an exported subversion checkout -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

8:06 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Pavel Alexeev <pahan(a)hubbitus.spb.su> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pahan(a)hubbitus.spb.su --- Comment #23 from Pavel Alexeev <pahan(a)hubbitus.spb.su> 2008-08-07 21:06:19 EDT --- By URL in spec - http://en.opensuse.org/Libzypp/Devel I can't found any reference to sat-solver. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

8:38 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 David A. Wheeler <dwheeler(a)dwheeler.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwheeler(a)dwheeler.com --- Comment #24 from David A. Wheeler <dwheeler(a)dwheeler.com> 2008-08-07 21:38:53 EDT --- I'm glad to see this! Two quick notes: miniSAT, another SAT solver that's used by several other programs, is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453701 "sat-solver" is a really generic name; it's quite likely that Fedora will end up with several competing SAT solvers. Shouldn't this SAT solver's package name be something a little more specific, like "libzypp-sat-solver"? That would leave "sat-solver" as a generic name (one that might, in the future, resolve to whatever default SAT solver the user desires, a la Java implementations). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

8:58 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #25 from David A. Wheeler <dwheeler(a)dwheeler.com> 2008-08-07 21:58:57 EDT --- In the "minisat2" package I added a small test case file, which _is_ satisfiable. This would take a trivial amount of space, if you don't want to include a massive test suite. It doesn't stress the solver, but it's a reasonable "smoke test" to see if the solver can run: c c start with comments c c p cnf 5 3 1 -5 4 0 -1 5 3 4 0 -3 -4 0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Monday, 18 August Mon, 18 Aug

6:49 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Michal Schmidt <mschmidt(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mschmidt(a)redhat.com --- Comment #26 from Michal Schmidt <mschmidt(a)redhat.com> 2008-08-18 19:49:35 EDT --- Do you really need to specify 'Requires: expat rpm zlib'? RPM is able to pick dependencies on shared libraries automatically. I'm not a native speaker, but I'm pretty sure the word is spelled 'satisfiability', not 'satisfyability' (Wikipedia and Googlefight confirm it). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Wednesday, 20 August Wed, 20 Aug

8:40 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #27 from Lorenzo Villani <lvillani(a)binaryhelix.net> 2008-08-20 09:40:04 EDT --- @Pavel Alexeev I'm sorry, the real URL is: http://en.opensuse.org/Libzypp/Sat_Solver @David A. Wheeler sat-solver is the upstream name. I just packaged it with it's original name. But I'm willing to change its name. Regarding the smoke test, I'll add that ASAP, it's more convenient than the huge test suite. @Michal Schmidt I'll remove that dependencies in 'Requires' and fix the spelling issues I am on vacation, it'll require some time to get the issues fixed. Please be patient and thanks for the interest :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Sunday, 24 August Sun, 24 Aug

2:20 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #28 from Lorenzo Villani <lvillani(a)binaryhelix.net> 2008-08-24 15:20:03 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://omploader.org/vcDdi/sat-solver-0.9.4-3.fc9.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://omploader.org/vcDdj/sat-solver.spec * Sat Aug 23 2008 Lorenzo Villani <lvillani(a)binaryhelix.net> - 0.9.4-3 - removed useless requires - Added a rpm database corruption patch - Use correct URI -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Monday, 25 August Mon, 25 Aug

10:04 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #29 from Lorenzo Villani <lvillani(a)binaryhelix.net> 2008-08-25 11:04:05 EDT --- If anyone wants to try the latest package with the included patch... It *should* fix a bug where yum, when used after zypper (or vice-versa) corrupt the RPM database. In particular it seems to not initialize the db cursor correctly. Please note that you should recompile libzypp and zypper against this version of the package. I'm testing it too, if no corruption happens in 2 days I'll assume that the issue has been fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

10:15 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #30 from Lorenzo Villani <lvillani(a)binaryhelix.net> 2008-08-25 11:15:25 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://omploader.org/vcDk3/sat-solver-0.9.4-4.fc9.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://omploader.org/vcDk4/sat-solver.spec Nothing exceptional, only fixed the mispelled word. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Friday, 26 September Fri, 26 Sep

12:47 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |debarshi.ray(a)gmail.com --- Comment #31 from Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray(a)gmail.com> 2008-09-26 01:47:17 EDT --- So is anyone interested in taking over this review? Lorenzo, are you sponsored and part of the packager group? I could not locate you on this list: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/members/packager?search=* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

12:59 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

...

Lorenzo, are you sponsored and part of the packager group?

Lorenzo has "arbiter" FAS name is sponsored by spot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

8:14 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #33 from Lorenzo Villani <lvillani(a)binaryhelix.net> 2008-09-26 09:14:21 EDT --- I'm still willing to get the package in Fedora, the above links *should* still point to srpm and specfile, if not just tell me. Please report if there's anything wrong with the package. I got no responses for a long time but I don't want to give up ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Friday, 10 October Fri, 10 Oct

9:06 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|debarshi.ray(a)gmail.com | AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |debarshi.ray(a)gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Wednesday, 15 October Wed, 15 Oct

2:32 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #34 from Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray(a)gmail.com> 2008-10-15 15:32:22 EDT --- MUST Items: OK - rpmlint is clean OK - follows Naming Guidelines OK - spec file is named as %{name}.spec xx - package does not meet Packaging Guidelines + The Source0 tag should have a valid URL pointing to the upstream release tarball. This is an important requirement. In case upstream does not provide any such tarball, the Spec should have a comment above the Source0 tag describing how the sources were obtained to create the package. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL + Could you throw some light on why it is a problem to build the language bindings on Fedora? Is it because of the ruby-rpm breakage in Rawhide? + Please do not strip the test-suite, if it is not absolutely necessary. Laziness arising out of needing to upload the SRPM several times is not a valid reason. :-) + It is not really necessary to create %{_target_platform}. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/cmake#Specfile_Usage + To preserve timestamps you could consider using: make install INSTALL="%{__install} -p" DESTDIR=%{buildroot} + Please add a comment in the Spec to document the rationale for shipping static libraries. + You could consider shipping the other files in the doc/ sub-directory as %doc. However shipping doc/PLANNING and doc/README in both the main package and the -devel sub-package is redundant. OK - license meets Licensing Guidelines OK - License field meets actual license OK - upstream license file included in %doc OK - spec file uses American English OK - spec file is legible ?? - sources might not match upstream sources + As noted earlier, please document how the sources were obtained. Place a comment above the Source0 tag for this. xx - package does not build successfully + sat-solver-no-bindings.patch does not apply cleanly and causes a build failure in Rawhide, which uses '/usr/bin/patch -s -p0 --fuzz=0'. See: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=882707&name=build.log ?? - ExcludeArch not needed ?? - missing build dependencies + Can not verify because package fails to build. OK - no locales xx - %post and %postun should not invoke ldconfig + Since shared libraries are not being shipped, invocation of /sbin/ldconfig is not needed and should be removed. OK - package is not relocatable OK - missing dependency on package that creates directory OK - no duplicates in %file OK - file permissions set properly OK - %clean present OK - macros used consistently OK - contains code and permissable content OK - -doc is not needed OK - contents of %doc does not affect the runtime OK - header files in -devel OK - static libraries in -static package OK - no pkgconfig files OK - no shared library files OK - -devel does not require base package + Only static libraries are provided as part of the -devel or -static package. Base package consists of only executables. OK - no libtool archives OK - %{name}.desktop file not needed OK - does not own files or directories owned by other packages OK - buildroot correctly prepped OK - all file names valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - upstream provides license text xx - no translations for description and summary xx - package does not build in mock successfully + As noted above, package fails to build in Rawhide. ?? - package builds on all supported architectures ?? - package functions as expected + Other components of the Zypper stack are needed to verify functionality. xx - scriptlets are not sane + As noted above, scriptlets are not needed and should be removed. OK - subpackages other than -devel are not needed + -devel provides a -static package. OK - no pkgconfig files OK - no file dependencies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Thursday, 16 October Thu, 16 Oct

7:16 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #35 from Lorenzo Villani <lvillani(a)binaryhelix.net> 2008-10-16 08:16:01 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=arbiter/public_git/rpm.git;a=blob_plain;... SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/srpm/sat-solver-0.9.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=884098 * Thu Oct 16 2008 Lorenzo Villani <lvillani(a)binaryhelix.net> - 0.9.5-1 - Comments on source0 origin - Removed no-bindings patch - Added perl and python bindings - rpm 4.5.90 patch - Test suite not stripped and enabled (recompressed tarball using bzip2 to save space and bandwidth) - Preserve timestamp when installing - Rationale about static libs - Removed unneeded scriptlets - Add other documentation to the main package - Remove redundant documentation files from other packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Monday, 20 October Mon, 20 Oct

11:22 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #36 from Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray(a)gmail.com> 2008-10-21 00:22:21 EDT --- + RPMLint is not clean on SRPM: [rishi@freebook SOURCES]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/sat-solver-0.9.5-1.fc10.src.rpm sat-solver.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 17) sat-solver.src: W: strange-permission sat-solver.spec 0775 sat-solver.src: W: strange-permission sat-solver-db-corruption-fix.patch 0775 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. [rishi@freebook SOURCES]$ RPMLint is not clean on build sub-packages: [rishi@freebook SPECS]$ rpmlint sat-solver-perl sat-solver-perl.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long The sat-solver-perl package contains libraries and perl modules to be used inside 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. [rishi@freebook SPECS]$ rpmlint sat-solver-python sat-solver-python.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long The sat-solver-python package contains libraries and python modules to be used inside 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. [rishi@freebook SPECS]$ Pretty simple actually. Just replace the tab with equivalent number of spaces on line 17 of sat-solver.spec, and make sure that the files in the SRPM have a permission of 0644. Lines in the description should not exceed 80 characters. + Is this package not meant for Fedora 9? The sat-solver-0.9.5-rpm4.5.90.patch patch broke the build on my Fedora 9 system. In case it is only meant for Fedora 10 and above, you could add a versioned dependency on rpm-devel (BuildRequires) and rpm-libs (Requires) to enforce this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

11:30 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #37 from Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray(a)gmail.com> 2008-10-21 00:30:19 EDT --- According to the Naming Guidelines, package names of Python modules should be prefixed with "python-" or "py". See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_... In this case you can use: %package -n python-%{name} ... %description -n python-%{name} ... %files -n python-%{name} Similarly for the Perl sub-package consult: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Sunday, 28 December Sun, 28 Dec

11:18 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(lvillani@binaryhe | |lix.net) --- Comment #38 from Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray(a)gmail.com> 2008-12-28 12:17:59 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

6:50 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Lorenzo Villani <lvillani(a)binaryhelix.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(lvillani@binaryhe | |lix.net) | --- Comment #39 from Lorenzo Villani <lvillani(a)binaryhelix.net> 2008-12-28 19:50:15 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=arbiter/public_git/rpm.git;a=blob;f=libs... SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/srpm/sat-solver-0.9.6-1.fc10.src.rpm * Sun Dec 28 2008 Lorenzo Villani <lvillani(a)binaryhelix.net> - 0.9.6-1 - 0.9.6 - sat-solver-perl -> perl-sat-solver - sat-solver-python -> python-sat-solver - fix weird .spec file permissions - fix mixed use of spaces and tabs - depend on rpm 4.6.0 (ie: build on Fedora 10 only) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Friday, 16 January Fri, 16 Jan

2:12 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

...

SPEC URL: http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=arbiter/public_git/rpm.git;a=blob;f=libs... SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/srpm/sat-solver-0.9.6-1.fc10.src.rpm

These URLs are not working. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Monday, 26 January Mon, 26 Jan

8:27 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Wednesday, 16 December Wed, 16 Dec

10:59 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Lorenzo Villani <lvillani(a)binaryhelix.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|DEFERRED | --- Comment #42 from Lorenzo Villani <lvillani(a)binaryhelix.net> 2009-12-16 11:59:15 EDT --- SPEC: http://gitorious.org/lvillani/specs/blobs/master/zypp/sat-solver/sat-solv... SRPM: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/sat-solver/ Notes: - reopening since the whole ZYpp stack seems now usable with rpm >= 4.6.0 - rpmlint: [lvillani@enterprise SRPMS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/sat-solver{,-devel,-doc,-debuginfo}-0.14.11-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/{perl,python}-sat-solver-0.14.11-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm ./sat-solver-0.14.11-1.fc12.src.rpm ../specs/zypp/sat-solver/sat-solver.spec 7 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Wednesday, 24 March Wed, 24 Mar

5:38 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Pavol Rusnak <stick(a)gk2.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |stick(a)gk2.sk --- Comment #43 from Pavol Rusnak <stick(a)gk2.sk> 2010-03-24 18:38:34 EDT --- Please have in mind that sat-solver is highly optimized for solving package dependencies. It is also a _static_ library which is being linked into libzypp and used nowhere else (yet). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Tuesday, 30 March Tue, 30 Mar

4:44 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

...

Please have in mind that sat-solver is highly optimized for solving package dependencies.

Are you suggesting me to use a different package name...

...

It is also a _static_ library which is being linked into libzypp and used nowhere else (yet).

... and to build sat-solver along with libzypp source package? (I don't know if I can do that). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Friday, 23 April Fri, 23 Apr

7 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Rahul Sundaram <metherid(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |metherid(a)gmail.com --- Comment #45 from Rahul Sundaram <metherid(a)gmail.com> 2010-04-23 08:00:39 EDT --- It fails to build on Fedora 13 because of the ld change --- /usr/bin/ld: ../ext/libsatsolverext.a(repo_rpmdb.o): undefined reference to symbol 'pgpPrtPkts' /usr/bin/ld: note: 'pgpPrtPkts' is defined in DSO /usr/lib/librpmio.so.1 so try adding it to the linker command line /usr/lib/librpmio.so.1: could not read symbols: Invalid operation collect2: ld returned 1 exit status --- Details on how to fix is at http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2010-February/000... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Saturday, 22 May Sat, 22 May

2:33 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #46 from Lorenzo Villani <lvillani(a)binaryhelix.net> 2010-05-22 15:32:48 EDT --- SPEC: http://gitorious.org/lvillani/specs/blobs/raw/master/sat-solver/sat-solve... SRPM: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/repo/fedora/13/SRPM/sat-solver-0.15.0-1.... Test (mock) builds for F13 here: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/repo/fedora/13/ Patch submitted upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

3 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Sunday, 23 May Sun, 23 May

8:52 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

...

zypper and lib-zypper has a BR on sat-solver-static but I don't find it in your mock build.

It is a "virtual" Provide from sat-solver-devel (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libra...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Thursday, 5 August Thu, 5 Aug

9:12 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Jan Engelhardt <jengelh(a)medozas.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jengelh(a)medozas.de --- Comment #49 from Jan Engelhardt <jengelh(a)medozas.de> 2010-08-05 10:12:35 EDT --- In response to comment #27:

...

sat-solver is the upstream name. I just packaged it with it's original name.

Upstream isn't always the best :) In openSUSE itself, the package is called libsatsolver (not libsat-solver nor sat-solver nor satsolver). Its subpackages are also called perl-satsolver (not perl-sat-solver). In that regard, sat-solver with a dash seems to be a relic name of the repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Friday, 20 August Fri, 20 Aug

12:50 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

...

Upstream isn't always the best :) In openSUSE itself, the package is called libsatsolver (not libsat-solver nor sat-solver nor satsolver).

It's called libsatsolver because they usually prefix library packages with "lib", IIRC.

...

[...] In that regard, sat-solver with a dash seems to be a relic name of the repository.

The most correct name is, probably, "satsolver". It's a generic (and probably misleading) name. Maybe I can rename this package to "satsolver" now and, should some conflict arise, rename it again later. Suggestions welcome (-: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

1:06 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

...

It's called libsatsolver because they usually prefix library packages with "lib", IIRC.

So, by that very logic, it should be "satsolver-libs" in Fedora. (Though the Fedora naming scheme always felt strange. What will be done if you need two versions. libfoo1 and libfoo2 work out, but foo-libs and foo-libs - you see the clash.)

...

"satsolver". It's a generic

Feel free to suggest; discussion was already started on similar hot topic http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-buildservice/2010-07/msg00179.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Monday, 23 August Mon, 23 Aug

5:48 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

...

So, by that very logic, it should be "satsolver-libs" in Fedora.

AFAIK, the "-libs" suffix is used when an application also happens to ship libraries usable by 3rd parties. So for pure libraries only "name" and "name-devel" are necessary, IIRC.

...

Feel free to suggest; discussion was already started on similar hot topic http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-buildservice/2010-07/msg00179.html

Following the "if it ain't broken, don't fix it" motto, I'd like to push this package as "satsolver" (not "sat-solver") and rename it only if needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Sunday, 29 August Sun, 29 Aug

7:48 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: satsolver - Satisfiability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Lorenzo Villani <lvillani(a)binaryhelix.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: sat-solver |Review Request: satsolver - |- Satisfyability Solver |Satisfiability Solver |library which can be used |library which can be used |to compute inter-package |to compute inter-package |dependencies. |dependencies. --- Comment #53 from Lorenzo Villani <lvillani(a)binaryhelix.net> 2010-08-29 08:48:39 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://github.com/lvillani/RPMs/raw/master/satsolver/satsolver.spec SRPM URL: http://arbiter.fedorapeople.org/reviews/satsolver/satsolver-0.15.0-2.fc13... Changed package's name. Also, I added some comments above PatchN and SourceN lines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

7:49 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: satsolver - Satisfiability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Tuesday, 9 August Tue, 9 Aug

5:06 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: satsolver - Satisfiability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola(a)iki.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola(a)iki.fi --- Comment #54 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola(a)iki.fi> 2011-08-09 06:06:26 EDT --- What's the status of this bug? There is another review at bug #729199. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

Friday, 16 December Fri, 16 Dec

3:54 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: satsolver - Satisfiability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #55 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola(a)iki.fi> 2011-12-16 04:54:41 EST --- Lorenzo - are you still there? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

3:55 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: satsolver - Satisfiability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola(a)iki.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tchollingsworth(a)gmail.com --- Comment #56 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola(a)iki.fi> 2011-12-16 04:55:20 EST --- *** Bug 729199 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

1:22 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: satsolver - Satisfiability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #57 from Lorenzo Villani <lorenzo(a)villani.me> 2011-12-16 14:21:53 EST --- Jussi, I am no longer involved in Fedora for the time being. I relinquished ownership of all my packages about one year ago. I thought I closed or reassigned all of my bugs but, apparently, I was wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

6:21 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: satsolver - Satisfiability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola(a)iki.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX AssignedTo|debarshi.ray(a)gmail.com |nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Flag|needinfo?(debarshi.ray@gmai | |l.com) | Last Closed|2009-01-26 09:26:56 |2011-12-16 19:21:09 --- Comment #58 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola(a)iki.fi> 2011-12-16 19:21:09 EST --- OK, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

6:22 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: satsolver - Satisfiability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.

4574

days inactive

5914

days old

package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

Manage subscription

65 comments

1 participants

tags (0)

participants (1)

Red Hat Bugzilla

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

[Bug 442714] New: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.