Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
Bug ID: 887913 Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Clipper - Polygon clipping in 2D Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: miro@hroncok.cz
Spec URL: https://github.com/hroncok/SPECS/raw/master/perl-Math-Clipper.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/downloads/hroncok/SPECS/perl-Math-Clipper-1.15-1.fc17.src... Description: Clipper is a C++ (and Delphi) library that implements polygon clipping. Fedora Account System Username: churchyard
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |ppisar@redhat.com Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |ppisar@redhat.com Flags| |fedora-review?
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? | Flags| |fedora-review-
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com --- URL and Source0 are usable. Ok. Source tar ball is original (SHA-256: f92f9febef97ca2fc42b58654cb8753a41e8492a7c047f8aeac09eb2ad1fe498). Ok. Summary verified from lib/Math/Clipper.pm. Ok.
FIX: The description is not about Math-Clipper Perl package.
License verified from lib/Math/Clipper.pm, src/clipper.hpp. Ok.
FATAL: This package bundles Clipper library http://sourceforge.net/projects/polyclipping/ (see src directory) and VERSION section in Math::Clipper POD:
This module was built around, and includes, Clipper version 4.9.6.
You have to package the C library from SF.net as separate package and then to build this perl package against the library.
Alternatively ask for exception Fedora Packaging Committee.
Resolution: Package NOT approved.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
--- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok miro@hroncok.cz --- What would you recommand? Askt the committee, or package it separately?
Could you provide help with any of the options?
Thanks
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
--- Comment #3 from Miro Hrončok miro@hroncok.cz --- As the clipper library is already in Fedora (as polyclipping package), I'll package this using it.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
--- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok miro@hroncok.cz --- Spec URL: https://github.com/hroncok/SPECS/raw/master/perl-Math-Clipper.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/downloads/hroncok/SPECS/perl-Math-Clipper-1.16-1.fc17.src...
- New version - Removed boundled C clipper and using the distribution one
I have a question about full versioning clipper (polyclipping) dependency. Math::Clipper version 1.16 comes with clipper 4.10.0. Should I require exactly this version of polyclipping-devel and libpolyclipping.so.3? If so, should I modify the spec for F17 and F18, as they are using older versions, to use older version of this Perl module too?
It seems, recent changes of this Perl module are only new library releases.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
Miro Hrončok miro@hroncok.cz changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |890839
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review- | Flags| |fedora-review?
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |876405, 876399
--- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com --- This is rebase, restarting review:
URL and Source0 are usable. Ok Source tar ball is original (SHA-256: 3bf01327a002852504026b673449d9c8e2a77543567d42d206aa7f6156b181de). Ok. perl-Math-Clipper-1.16-1.no-c-sources.patch is good. Ok. Summary is good. Ok. Description is good. Ok. License verified from lib/Math/Clipper.pm. Ok. Bundled Clipper is not used. Ok.
TODO: Do not package META.json and xsp subtree. These are not useful for users.
TODO: Specify version for perl(Module::Build::WithXSpp) build-require `>= 0.10' (META.yml:12).
TODO: In my opinion `perl(ExtUtils::XSpp)' is not direct dependency of this package, so it shouldn't be build-required.
TODO: Build-require `perl(XSLoader)' for running tests (lib/Math/Clipper.pm:14). TODO: Build-require `perl(constant)' for running tests (t/002basic.t:6).
FIX: This package build-requires Module::Build::WithXSpp (bug #876405) and ExtUtils::Typemaps::Default (bug #876399) which are not yet in Fedora. I added proper bug dependencies and I postponed this review until they get into Fedora.
Resolution: POSTPONED.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
--- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com --- (In reply to comment #4)
I have a question about full versioning clipper (polyclipping) dependency. Math::Clipper version 1.16 comes with clipper 4.10.0. Should I require exactly this version of polyclipping-devel and libpolyclipping.so.3?
I do not need to specify run-time dependency on libpolyclipping.so.3. It should get discovered by rpmbuild automatically.
You need to build-require specific version of polyclipping-devel only if it's required due to incompatibilities. I think it's not necessary in this case as the polyclipping does not change ABI frequently. However I would recommend to build-require minimal version equalled to bundled version because users can imply Clipper version from Math::Clipper. I.e. polyclipping-devel >= 4.10.0 for this perl-Clipper-Math release.
If so, should I modify the spec for F17 and F18, as they are using older versions, to use older version of this Perl module too?
You should be consistent across Fedora releases, thus if you decide to tie the two versions, you should either not package Perl module into older Fedoras, or upgrade polyclipping, or package older Perl modules. That's up to you.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
--- Comment #7 from Miro Hrončok miro@hroncok.cz --- Spec URL: https://github.com/hroncok/SPECS/raw/master/perl-Math-Clipper.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/downloads/hroncok/SPECS/perl-Math-Clipper-1.16-2.fc17.src...
- Removed META.json and xsp from doc - Specified version for polyclipping-devel BR - Specified version for perl(Module::Build::WithXSpp) BR - Removed perl(ExtUtils::XSpp) BR - Added BRs perl(XSLoader) and perl(constant)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
--- Comment #8 from Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com --- Both build-required packages are now in rawhide.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
--- Comment #9 from Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com --- Spec file changes:
--- perl-Math-Clipper.spec.old 2013-01-02 10:59:45.371000000 +0100 +++ perl-Math-Clipper.spec 2013-01-08 10:09:41.174000000 +0100 @@ -1,23 +1,24 @@ Name: perl-Math-Clipper Version: 1.16 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Perl wrapper around Clipper library License: Boost Group: Development/Libraries URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Math-Clipper/ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/A/AA/AAR/Math-Clipper-%%7Bversion%7D.tar.gz Patch0: %{name}-1.16-1.no-c-sources.patch -BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::Typemaps::Default) >= 0.05 -BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::XSpp) >= 0.16 -BuildRequires: perl(Module::Build) -BuildRequires: perl(Module::Build::WithXSpp) -BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) -BuildRequires: perl(Test::Deep) -BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec) BuildRequires: perl(Carp) BuildRequires: perl(Config) +BuildRequires: perl(constant) BuildRequires: perl(Exporter) -BuildRequires: polyclipping-devel +BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::Typemaps::Default) >= 0.05 +BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec) +BuildRequires: perl(Module::Build) +BuildRequires: perl(Module::Build::WithXSpp) >= 0.10 +BuildRequires: perl(Test::Deep) +BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) +BuildRequires: perl(XSLoader) +BuildRequires: polyclipping-devel >= 4.10 Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version))
%{?perl_default_filter} # Filters (not)shared c libs @@ -45,12 +46,19 @@ ./Build test
%files -%doc Changes META.json xsp +%doc Changes %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/* %{perl_vendorarch}/Math* %{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog +* Thu Jan 03 2013 Miro Hrončok miro@hroncok.cz - 1.16-2 +- Removed META.json and xsp from doc +- Specified version for polyclipping-devel BR +- Specified version for perl(Module::Build::WithXSpp) BR +- Removed perl(ExtUtils::XSpp) BR +- Added BRs perl(XSLoader) and perl(constant) + * Fri Dec 28 2012 Miro Hrončok miro@hroncok.cz - 1.16-1 - New version - Removed boundled C clipper and using the distribution one
TODO: Do not package META.json and xsp subtree. These are not useful for users.
-%doc Changes META.json xsp +%doc Changes Ok.
TODO: Specify version for perl(Module::Build::WithXSpp) build-require `>= 0.10' (META.yml:12).
TODO: In my opinion `perl(ExtUtils::XSpp)' is not direct dependency of this package, so it shouldn't be build-required.
-BuildRequires: perl(Module::Build::WithXSpp) +BuildRequires: perl(Module::Build::WithXSpp) >= 0.10 Ok.
TODO: Build-require `perl(XSLoader)' for running tests (lib/Math/Clipper.pm:14).
+BuildRequires: perl(XSLoader) Ok.
TODO: Build-require `perl(constant)' for running tests (t/002basic.t:6).
+BuildRequires: perl(constant) Ok.
FIX: This package build-requires Module::Build::WithXSpp (bug #876405) and ExtUtils::Typemaps::Default (bug #876399) which are not yet in Fedora. I added proper bug dependencies and I postponed this review until they get into Fedora.
Ok.
TODO: You can replace %__perl macro with plain perl.
All tests pass. Ok.
$ rpmlint perl-Math-Clipper.spec ../SRPMS/perl-Math-Clipper-1.16-2.fc19.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/perl-Math-Clipper-1.16-2.fc19.x86_64.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint is Ok.
$ rpm -q -lv -p ../RPMS/x86_64/perl-Math-Clipper-1.16-2.fc19.x86_64.rpm drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jan 8 10:24 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/Math -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 24913 Jan 8 10:24 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/Math/Clipper.pm drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jan 8 10:24 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Math drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jan 8 10:24 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Math/Clipper -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 36544 Jan 8 10:24 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Math/Clipper/Clipper.so drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jan 8 10:24 /usr/share/doc/perl-Math-Clipper-1.16 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3365 Dec 26 15:31 /usr/share/doc/perl-Math-Clipper-1.16/Changes -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8769 Jan 8 10:24 /usr/share/man/man3/Math::Clipper.3pm.gz
File layout and permissions are Ok.
$ rpm -q --requires -p ../RPMS/x86_64/perl-Math-Clipper-1.16-2.fc19.x86_64.rpm |sort |uniq -c 1 libc.so.6()(64bit) 1 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) 1 libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) 1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) 1 libpolyclipping.so.4()(64bit) 1 libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) 1 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) 1 libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) 1 perl >= 0:5.008 1 perl(Carp) 1 perl(Config) 1 perl(Exporter) 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(warnings) 1 perl(XSLoader) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 1 rtld(GNU_HASH) Binary requires are Ok.
$ rpm -q --provides -p ../RPMS/x86_64/perl-Math-Clipper-1.16-2.fc19.x86_64.rpm |sort |uniq -c 1 perl(Math::Clipper) = 1.16 1 perl-Math-Clipper = 1.16-2.fc19 1 perl-Math-Clipper(x86-64) = 1.16-2.fc19 Binary provides are Ok.
FIX: Package does not build in F19 (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4847703). Math::Clipper::orientation: polygon is not an array reference at t/011Int128Comparison.t line 30. # Looks like your test exited with 255 before it could output anything. t/011Int128Comparison.t .. Dubious, test returned 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00) Failed 1/1 subtests Test Summary Report ------------------- t/011Int128Comparison.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 0 Failed: 0) Non-zero exit status: 255 Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 1 tests but ran 0. Files=11, Tests=63, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.02 sys + 0.45 cusr 0.07 csys = 0.60 CPU) Result: FAIL
I think this is due to newer polyclipping-devel-5.0.2-1.fc19 library in rawhide.
Otherwise the package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guidelines.
Please correct all `FIX' issues, consider fixing `TODO' items, and provide new spec file.
Resolution: Package NOT approved.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
--- Comment #10 from Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com --- (In reply to comment #9)
I think this is due to newer polyclipping-devel-5.0.2-1.fc19 library in rawhide.
It seems to.
I'll wait for upstream to publish new version.
Is there a way to add this package to F17 and F18 where are the older versions of polyclipping-devel? Even if it builds in rawhide, i would add older versions to F17 and F18 to reflect upstream perl module and library version relations.
Thanks
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(psabata@redhat.co | |m)
--- Comment #11 from Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com --- (In reply to comment #10)
Is there a way to add this package to F17 and F18 where are the older versions of polyclipping-devel? Even if it builds in rawhide, i would add older versions to F17 and F18 to reflect upstream perl module and library version relations.
What do sponsors think?
I believe best practise is to package and review for rawhide first. At least because older build inherits into rawhide.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
Petr Šabata psabata@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |psabata@redhat.com Flags|needinfo?(psabata@redhat.co | |m) |
--- Comment #12 from Petr Šabata psabata@redhat.com --- I can only speak for myself :)
Always build for the rawhide first to avoid unintentional upgrade path breakage.
Although unusual, I suppose building older versions of the module for older Fedora releases wouldn't violate any packaging rules. It's similar to patching the package to work with the older dependencies present there.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
Bug 887913 depends on bug 876405, which changed state.
Bug 876405 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Build-WithXSpp - XS++ enhanced flavor of Module::Build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876405
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
--- Comment #13 from Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com --- Spec URL: https://github.com/hroncok/SPECS/raw/master/perl-Math-Clipper.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/downloads/hroncok/SPECS/perl-Math-Clipper-1.17-1.fc18.src...
Now works with rawhide version of clipper lib. Please, do the review before upstream releases new lib version :D
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? | Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #14 from Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com --- This is rebase, doing review from scratch.
URL and Source0 are useable. ok. Source tar ball is original (SHA-256: fadd8d60a1499ae584f3d587475d27a01f4679249c1050f5307d71c09095c684). Ok. Patch to build against system library is Ok. Summary is Ok. Description is Ok. License verified from lib/Math/Clipper.pm. Ok. There is XS code, architecture specific BuildArch is Ok.
TODO: You can replace %{__perl} macro with plain perl command. TODO: You can remove `perl(Module::Build)' from build-requires as there is no direct use of the module (the build is driven by Module::Build::WithXSpp).
All tests pass. Ok.
$ rpmlint perl-Math-Clipper.spec ../SRPMS/perl-Math-Clipper-1.17-1.fc19.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/perl-Math-Clipper-*1.17-1.* 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint is Ok.
$ rpm -q -lv -p ../RPMS/x86_64/perl-Math-Clipper-1.17-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jan 17 14:43 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/Math -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 24978 Jan 17 14:43 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/Math/Clipper.pm drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jan 17 14:43 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Math drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jan 17 14:43 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Math/Clipper -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 36536 Jan 17 14:43 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Math/Clipper/Clipper.so drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jan 17 14:43 /usr/share/doc/perl-Math-Clipper-1.17 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3522 Jan 15 14:09 /usr/share/doc/perl-Math-Clipper-1.17/Changes -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8790 Jan 17 14:43 /usr/share/man/man3/Math::Clipper.3pm.gz File permissions and layout are Ok.
$ rpm -q --requires -p ../RPMS/x86_64/perl-Math-Clipper-1.17-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm |sort | uniq -c 1 libc.so.6()(64bit) 1 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) 1 libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) 1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) 1 libpolyclipping.so.5()(64bit) 1 libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) 1 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) 1 libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) 1 perl >= 0:5.008 1 perl(Carp) 1 perl(Config) 1 perl(Exporter) 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(warnings) 1 perl(XSLoader) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 1 rtld(GNU_HASH) Binary requires are Ok.
$ rpm -q --provides -p ../RPMS/x86_64/perl-Math-Clipper-1.17-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm |sort | uniq -c 1 perl(Math::Clipper) = 1.17 1 perl-Math-Clipper = 1.17-1.fc19 1 perl-Math-Clipper(x86-64) = 1.17-1.fc19 Binary provides are Ok.
$ resolvedeps rawhide ../RPMS/x86_64/perl-Math-Clipper-1.17-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm Binary dependencies resolvable. Ok.
Package builds in F19 (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4878183). Ok.
Package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guidelines.
Please fix all `TODO' items before building the package. Resolution: Package APPROVED.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #15 from Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Math-Clipper Short Description: Polygon clipping in 2D Owners: churchyard Branches: f17 f18 InitialCC: perl-sig
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
--- Comment #16 from Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com --- (In reply to comment #14)
TODO: You can replace %{__perl} macro with plain perl command.
Why is there such macro anyway? Why should I not use it? If it is documented, don't explain it, just show me where, thanks.
Thanks for the review.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
--- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
--- Comment #18 from Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com --- (In reply to comment #16)
(In reply to comment #14)
TODO: You can replace %{__perl} macro with plain perl command.
Why is there such macro anyway?
I don't know. Maybe some Fedora elders could know.
Why should I not use it?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#... https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/64
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
--- Comment #19 from Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com --- Thanks
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Math-Clipper-1.15-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Math-Clipper-1.15-1.fc18
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
Bug 887913 depends on bug 876399, which changed state.
Bug 876399 Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps-Default - Set of useful typemaps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876399
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed| |2013-02-02 14:50:32
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Math-Clipper-1.15-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Math-Clipper-1.15-1.fc17
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |ERRATA
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Math-Clipper-1.15-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Red Hat Bugzilla