[Bug 1826950] New: Review Request: python-django-jsonfield - is a reusable model field that allows you to store validated JSON, automatically handling serialization to and from the database.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
Bug ID: 1826950 Summary: Review Request: python-django-jsonfield - is a reusable model field that allows you to store validated JSON, automatically handling serialization to and from the database. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: bazanluis20@gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora
Description: is a reusable model field that allows you to store validated JSON, automatically handling serialization to and from the database.
SPEC:https://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-django-jsonfield.spec SRPM:https://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-django-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm
Koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43655907
koji build --scratch rawhide python-django-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Uploading srpm: python-django-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm [====================================] 100% 00:00:00 21.75 KiB 53.13 KiB/sec Created task: 43655907 Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43655907 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 43655907 build (rawhide, python-django-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm): free 43655907 build (rawhide, python-django-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm): free -> open (buildvm-armv7-20.arm.fedoraproject.org) 43655912 rebuildSRPM (noarch): open (buildvm-armv7-07.arm.fedoraproject.org) 43655980 buildArch (python-django-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc33.src.rpm, noarch): free 43655912 rebuildSRPM (noarch): open (buildvm-armv7-07.arm.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 1 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 43655980 buildArch (python-django-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc33.src.rpm, noarch): free -> open (buildvm-19.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 43655980 buildArch (python-django-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc33.src.rpm, noarch): open (buildvm-19.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 1 open 2 done 0 failed 43655907 build (rawhide, python-django-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm): open (buildvm-armv7-20.arm.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 0 open 3 done 0 failed
43655907 build (rawhide, python-django-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm) completed successfully
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
Luis Bazan bazanluis20@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |python-django-jsonfield Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
--- Comment #1 from Luis Bazan bazanluis20@gmail.com --- This re-review is to unretire this package: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9287
Cheers,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
Luis Bazan bazanluis20@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1799928
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1799928 [Bug 1799928] python-django-post_office: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f32
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
Luis Bazan bazanluis20@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1810731
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1810731 [Bug 1810731] python3-django-post_office fails during test update from f31 to f32
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mhroncok@redhat.com Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |mhroncok@redhat.com Flags| |fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
--- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com --- Spec sanity:
Source0: https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/%(n=%%7Bpypi_name%7D; echo ${n:0:1})/%{pypi_name}/%{pypi_name}-%{version}.tar.gz
Please, use %pypi_source, https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_source_fi...
BuildRequires: python3-tox BuildRequires: python3-coverage
There is no %check, why does the package need tox and coverage?
Requires: python3-django Requires: python3-django-formtools
The following requirement is generated automatically, please drop the explicit one:
python3.8dist(django) >= 2.2
The package does not seem to need formtools, https://github.com/rpkilby/jsonfield/search?q=formtools&unscoped_q=formt... yields nothing. Please drop the (buil)requires or prove me wrong.
%{python3_sitelib}/* is forbidden (well, discouraged), see https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_files_to_...
* Mon Apr 24 2020 Luis Bazan lbazan@fedoraproject.org - 3.1.0-1 - Rebuild
This entry doesn't make much sense.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
--- Comment #3 from Luis Bazan bazanluis20@gmail.com --- Ups my mistake!
thanks Miro --
Working on it!
Cheers,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
--- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com --- No problemo ;)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
--- Comment #5 from Luis Bazan bazanluis20@gmail.com --- Hi Miro --
Source Fixed changelog Fixed sitelib Fixed djangoversion Fixed tox/coverage droped Fixed formtools fixed
SPEC:https://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-django-jsonfield.spec SRPM:https://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-django-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
--- Comment #6 from Luis Bazan bazanluis20@gmail.com --- License change to MIT Fixed
Cheers,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
--- Comment #7 from Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com --- This is wrong:
BuildRequires: python3.8dist(django) >= 2.2
(For example it will break on Fedora 31 or when we update Python to 3.9.)
Please keep buildrequiring Python version agnostic python3-django. The "python3.8dist(django)" dependency is generated for runtime (automatically from upstream metadata).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
--- Comment #8 from Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com --- %{python3_sitelib}/%{pypi_name} %{python3_sitelib}/%{pypi_name}-%{version}-py?.?.egg-info
I suggest to replace this with:
%{python3_sitelib}/%{pypi_name}/ %{python3_sitelib}/%{pypi_name}-%{version}-py%{python3_version}.egg-info/
This ensures:
- future compatibility with Python 3.10 - the build will fail if the path is accidentally not a directory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
--- Comment #9 from Luis Bazan bazanluis20@gmail.com --- :-)
Buildrequires Fixed Suggestions applied.
Cheers,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
--- Comment #10 from Luis Bazan bazanluis20@gmail.com --- SPEC:https://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-django-jsonfield.spec SRPM:https://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-django-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
--- Comment #11 from Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com --- There is lot of trailing whitespace, consider trimming it.
The source is different than in the source url:
https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/j/jsonfield/jsonfield-3.1.0.t... : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 83830542a6fcd517cb362a20239c9305a38295319b0476d79ec05b918bca1fad CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 7e4e84597de21eeaeeaaa7cc5da08c61c48a9b64d0c446b2d71255d01812887a diff -r also reports differences
Please, run the upstream testsuite in %check:
%check PYTHONPATH=%{buildroot}%{python3_sitelib} %{python3} manage.py test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
--- Comment #12 from Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com --- According to the guidelines, the package name should be python-jsonfield / python3-jsonfield, not python-django-jsonfield / python3-django-jsonfield.
It might obsolete/provide python3-django-jsonfield to provide na upgrade path.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
--- Comment #13 from Luis Bazan bazanluis20@gmail.com --- Hi Miro --
Renamed Fixed Test added Fixed whitespace Fixed Source Fixed
SPEC:https://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-jsonfield.spec SRPM:https://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm
koji build --scratch rawhide python-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Uploading srpm: python-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm [====================================] 100% 00:00:00 21.63 KiB 52.99 KiB/sec Created task: 43670083 Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43670083 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 43670083 build (rawhide, python-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm): free 43670083 build (rawhide, python-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm): free -> open (buildvm-armv7-24.arm.fedoraproject.org) 43670085 rebuildSRPM (noarch): free 43670085 rebuildSRPM (noarch): free -> open (buildvm-armv7-17.arm.fedoraproject.org) 43670085 rebuildSRPM (noarch): open (buildvm-armv7-17.arm.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 43670169 buildArch (python-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc33.src.rpm, noarch): free 43670169 buildArch (python-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc33.src.rpm, noarch): free -> open (buildvm-armv7-13.arm.fedoraproject.org) 43670169 buildArch (python-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc33.src.rpm, noarch): open (buildvm-armv7-13.arm.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 1 open 2 done 0 failed 43670083 build (rawhide, python-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm): open (buildvm-armv7-24.arm.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 0 open 3 done 0 failed
43670083 build (rawhide, python-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm) completed successfully
Cheers,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
Luis Bazan bazanluis20@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |python-jsonfield
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
Luis Bazan bazanluis20@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |python-django-jsonfield - |python-jsonfield - is a |is a reusable model field |reusable model field that |that allows you to store |allows you to store |validated JSON, |validated JSON, |automatically handling |automatically handling |serialization to and from |serialization to and from |the database. |the database.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
--- Comment #14 from Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com --- The description does not reflect the package rename.
The source tarball is still not the same as in the URL:
Source checksums ---------------- https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/j/jsonfield/jsonfield-3.1.0.t... : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 83830542a6fcd517cb362a20239c9305a38295319b0476d79ec05b918bca1fad CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 7e4e84597de21eeaeeaaa7cc5da08c61c48a9b64d0c446b2d71255d01812887a diff -r also reports differences
The spec still has plenty of trailing whitespace and mixes tabs and spaces.
From rpmlint: python-jsonfield.src:23: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 23) python-jsonfield.src: W: file-size-mismatch jsonfield-3.1.0.tar.gz = 14813, https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/j/jsonfield/jsonfield-3.1.0.t... = 14870
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
--- Comment #15 from Luis Bazan bazanluis20@gmail.com --- Hi Miro
Working on it!
Cheers,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
--- Comment #16 from Luis Bazan bazanluis20@gmail.com --- SPEC:https://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-jsonfield.spec SRPM:https://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm
rpmlint python-jsonfield.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint python-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
--- Comment #17 from Luis Bazan bazanluis20@gmail.com --- Hi Miro
Description fixed whitespace fixed source fixed
Cheers,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
--- Comment #18 from Luis Bazan bazanluis20@gmail.com --- koji build --scratch rawhide python-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Uploading srpm: python-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm [====================================] 100% 00:00:00 21.63 KiB 52.81 KiB/sec Created task: 43699551 Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43699551 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 43699551 build (rawhide, python-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm): free 43699551 build (rawhide, python-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm): free -> open (buildvm-armv7-11.arm.fedoraproject.org) 43699552 rebuildSRPM (noarch): open (buildvm-03.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 43699552 rebuildSRPM (noarch): open (buildvm-03.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 43699553 buildArch (python-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc33.src.rpm, noarch): open (buildvm-armv7-11.arm.fedoraproject.org) 43699553 buildArch (python-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc33.src.rpm, noarch): open (buildvm-armv7-11.arm.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 1 open 2 done 0 failed 43699551 build (rawhide, python-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm): open (buildvm-armv7-11.arm.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 0 open 3 done 0 failed
43699551 build (rawhide, python-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm) completed successfully
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #19 from Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com --- Package Review ==============
Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Package APPROVED.
There is still some amount of useless trailing whitespace, but that is not a blocker.
===== MUST items =====
Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License". [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [?]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [?]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint ------- Checking: python3-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc33.noarch.rpm python-jsonfield-3.1.0-1.fc33.src.rpm python3-jsonfield.noarch: E: useless-provides python-jsonfield python3-jsonfield.noarch: E: useless-provides python38-jsonfield 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings.
If you target other versions than rawhide, ignore the useless-provides error.
Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- python3-jsonfield.noarch: E: useless-provides python-jsonfield python3-jsonfield.noarch: E: useless-provides python38-jsonfield 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings.
Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/rpkilby/jsonfield/archive/3.1.0/jsonfield-3.1.0.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 83830542a6fcd517cb362a20239c9305a38295319b0476d79ec05b918bca1fad CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 83830542a6fcd517cb362a20239c9305a38295319b0476d79ec05b918bca1fad
Requires -------- python3-jsonfield (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi) python3.8dist(django)
Provides -------- python3-jsonfield: python-jsonfield python3-jsonfield python3.8dist(jsonfield) python38-jsonfield python3dist(jsonfield)
Generated by fedora-review 0.7.0 (fed5495) last change: 2019-03-17 Command line :try-fedora-review -b 1826950 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: fonts, Java, Ruby, Haskell, SugarActivity, PHP, Ocaml, R, Perl, C/C++ Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
--- Comment #20 from Gwyn Ciesla gwync@protonmail.com --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-jsonfield
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|POST |MODIFIED
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2020-120aea1636 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-120aea1636
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|POST |MODIFIED
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2020-120aea1636 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-120aea1636
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2020-28f36b7cca has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-28f36b7cca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2020-28f36b7cca has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-28f36b7cca` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-28f36b7cca
See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2020-120aea1636 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-120aea1636` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-120aea1636
See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2020-05-06 03:07:34
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2020-120aea1636 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2020-28f36b7cca has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
bugzilla＠redhat.com